Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Big Brother is watching.
The Knoxville News-Sentinel ^ | 9/25/2002 | Randy Kenner

Posted on 09/25/2002 9:38:23 PM PDT by simon says what

An Ohio man filed a $1.5 million lawsuit Tuesday against the Knoxville Marriott hotel after finding a hidden camera in a bathroom light fixture in July.

Bryan Brewer discovered the small video camera after noticing a tiny black spot - which he thought was an insect but turned out to be a hole - in the fixture, according to the lawsuit.

At the time Brewer, the vice president of a California company, was staying at the Marriott while on business.

His attorney, K.O. Herston, filed the lawsuit in Knox County Circuit Court. Named as defendants are Marriott International Inc. and Columbia Sussex Corp., a Fort Mitchell, Ky., corporation that operated at least 28 Marriotts with more than 8,500 rooms.

"The allegations have been turned over to the proper authorities, who we are cooperating with fully," said Doug Allen, the general manager of the downtown Marriott.

Allen declined to comment any further, citing an ongoing investigation by the Knox County Sheriff's Department. Brewer, contacted Tuesday, declined comment.

According to the lawsuit, Brewer, 27, discovered the camera on the morning of July 11.

"Thinking it might be an insect, Mr. Brewer swatted at the black spot, thereby inadvertently breaking the plastic cover on the light fixture," Herston wrote in the lawsuit. "He called the front desk, apologized and offered to pay for the fixture."

But while he was waiting for someone to fix the damage, Brewer noticed wires and discovered a small video camera.

A further look by security personnel confirmed that it was an elaborate, self-contained, video recording system.

"The video camera was connected to the bathroom light switch such that the camera would begin recording when the bathroom light was turned on and would stop recording when (it) was turned off," the lawsuit states.

Herston said that the equipment had a film of dust on it indicating that it had been there for some time. It also had a piece of tape on it indicating the room number, Room 253.

Herston said that Marriott employees let Brewer view the tape in their presence but refused to give it to him.

The tape and video equipment have been turned over to the Sheriff's Department.

The Sheriff's Department also has refused to give him the tape, Herston said.

He also said he's not sure why the Sheriff's Department is investigating the case since the Knoxville Police Department is next door to the Marriott.

Herston said the detective handling the case told him, "'All I know is that I was called to the scene and I responded to the call.'"

Marriott officials said they have inspected other rooms at the hotel but have refused to say what, if anything, was found, Herston said.

"There are a lot of questions and we need some answers," Herston said before adding, "How many other people were taped?"

Martha Dooley, a spokeswoman for the Sheriff's Department, said the reason the tape isn't being turned over is because, "It is an ongoing investigation."

As for the office handling the case, Dooley said, "We routinely answer calls from businesses and residences in the city as well as the county."

Someone from the hotel apparently called the Sheriff's Department directly.

KPD spokesman Darrell DeBusk said that KPD did not receive a call from the hotel.

The lawsuit contends that Brewer has suffered harm as a result of the discovery.

"In Mr. Brewer's case, he has become paranoid," Herston indicated. "He hates to travel now and that has caused tension at work since his job requires so much travel. When he does travel, he spends a lot of time going over every inch of his hotel room to make sure it is safe.

"This has really affected his career and well-being."

In addition to the $1.5 million in damages, Brewer also seeks the return of all copies of the videotaped recording of him.

Brewer has not been back in Knoxville since the incident.

"If he comes back, he certainly won't stay at the Marriott," Herston said.

Randy Kenner may be reached at 865-342-6305 or kenner@knews.com


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bigbrother; hiddencamera; marriott; taping; video
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: Oztrich Boy
Acually, no body including the police will give him the tape. It likely has others on it. It also could have been one of those continuous types that repeat.

I would have been happy with a free stay. I still think the guy is a suit happy weeny!

21 posted on 09/25/2002 10:31:42 PM PDT by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Cindy
A little too high touch to be a perv. Seems like the FBI has inventory issues with their hidden cameras.

I would have taken it and not called the hotel dick. It would be fun to sell it on EBay.

22 posted on 09/25/2002 10:37:28 PM PDT by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: simon says what
"He also said he's not sure why the Sheriff's Department is investigating the case since the Knoxville Police Department is next door to the Marriott."

Anyone want to bet that the recording gear is police issue?!

23 posted on 09/25/2002 10:40:11 PM PDT by Southack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cindy
Sorry Cindy, I would buy the pervert explanation except for one line in the story.

Herston said that the equipment had a film of dust on it indicating that it had been there for some time. It also had a piece of tape on it indicating the room number, Room 253.

This makes it pretty clear that there was more than one camera involved and more than one room. Who, what or where is unknown -- but I would bet money on either a law enforcement op or hotel management. Either way, it is an obvious violation of the civil rights of everyone who stayed in that room.

24 posted on 09/25/2002 11:01:40 PM PDT by Ronin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: eno_
Well, of course we're speculating, but that's pretty standard m.o. for perverts. Since the room number is allegedly noted on the evidence; it's probably a bigger pervert operation than a one-room peeper.
25 posted on 09/26/2002 1:13:33 AM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

Comment #26 Removed by Moderator

To: Ronin
The number on the camera isn't neccessarily proof there's more than one- it could be that the number was on there to make sure the instasller didn't screw up and put it in the wrong room.
27 posted on 09/27/2002 5:14:18 AM PDT by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson