Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

High cost of a war between Koreas
SJ Mercury News ^ | 1/4/06 | Michael Dorgan

Posted on 01/05/2003 7:36:49 PM PST by NormsRevenge

Edited on 04/13/2004 3:30:07 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-126 next last
To: Forgiven_Sinner
Could the NK army really achieve a total tactical surprise?

About the same tactical surprise that a thug holding a loaded gun with a hair-trigger at your temple could achieve. Locked and loaded, armed and ready, they are that close to downtown Seoul.

We have F-16s at Osan and Kunsan; F-15s and more F-16s in Japan including Okinawa. The Navy and Marines have F-14s, F-18s, and intruders in the area. For a really big punch we have B-52s at Guam.

21 posted on 01/05/2003 8:24:53 PM PST by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Torie
I can't imagine all this occur without some warning. With that warning, I suspect N. Korea would be dissuaded.

Don't bet on it. Thanks to loose lips from our good friends, the South Koreans, the North has been able to minimize their visible preparations to an amount of time that is probably without equal. Mobilization requires certain tasks to be performed, especially in a large combined arms assault, but they've frontloaded most of it.

And yes, while we do watch, the North Koreans will periodically mobilize in a way that indistinguishable from an attack, save the firing. Sometimes clumsy, sometimes very subtle, just to keep us off guard. I'm sure they hope that crying wolf long enough will deafen the right ears. As far as the South Koreans are concerned, I'd have to say they are right.

22 posted on 01/05/2003 8:25:34 PM PST by Steel Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Forgiven_Sinner
"Ground forces do not really hold up under B-52 long stick bombardment"

Yes, those B-52 "ARC LIGHT" missions won THAT war for us, didn't they? Strange how I managed to forget that... Your assumptions are correct, insofar as we will "win" any war with N. Korea (even if China should jump in- unlikely). But the death toll will be so high that you will think it's a misprint when you see it in your paper.

You might want to review the histroy of the Korean War, especially from 25 June 1950 until MacArthur managed to land at Inchon- we were routed- entire units broke and ran South, and Seoul was practically destroyed almost immediately. That was WITHOUT nuclear or chemical weapons.

23 posted on 01/05/2003 8:27:57 PM PST by RANGERAIRBORNE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry
Yes, but the North Koreans have the densest ADA network on the planet. Not terribly sophisticated, but it will keep our planes flying very high, or risking terrible levels of fire to get in down and dirty.

The air power we have is unparalleled, but to counter this the North has placed literaly hundreds of sabotures in the South, their famed 'special forces' brigades are ready to infiltrate deep and quickly, and their missile attacks will target our airbases.

24 posted on 01/05/2003 8:31:31 PM PST by Steel Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RANGERAIRBORNE
Exactly. They have an invasion force on the border, without moving a man.
25 posted on 01/05/2003 8:34:21 PM PST by Republic of Texas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RANGERAIRBORNE
"The 38,000 American troops (and their dependents) would be little more than hostages- those who survived."

Not many would survive. Some 14,000 tubes of North Korean artillery are laid on their priority targets right now, many of which are undoubtedly American positions.

If you can imagine a million rounds of artillery landing in the space of about an hour, you can picture the amount of devastation.

26 posted on 01/05/2003 8:34:22 PM PST by fogarty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Steel Wolf
What we need very badly is "regime change" in North Korea- hopefully the Russians and Chinese will be helpful with this- I wonder how much Putin really owes us at this point???
27 posted on 01/05/2003 8:35:16 PM PST by RANGERAIRBORNE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Steel Wolf
So you are saying that the Pentagon thinks that the N. Koreans could launch a surprise attack, and we could do little about it until after our troops were killed, and Seoul destroyed? I don't believe it.
28 posted on 01/05/2003 8:36:26 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: RANGERAIRBORNE
You might want to review the histroy of the Korean War, especially from 25 June 1950 until MacArthur managed to land at Inchon- we were routed--

That's right. ROK and US forces were pushed hard south until they held only a pocket that included the port city of Pusan. MacArthur backdoored the North Koreans by coming in behind them at Inchon, west of Seoul.

When the US retreat was at its most earnest, serious thought was given to employing tactical nukes against North Korean forces massed in pockets between some of the interior southern mountains of Korea.

29 posted on 01/05/2003 8:37:18 PM PST by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Torie
I don't believe it

Believe it.

30 posted on 01/05/2003 8:38:20 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: RANGERAIRBORNE
You're right about that - we had hundreds of thousands bottled up at Pusan. It was the Marine Division at Pusan that saved us from being totally driven off the Peninsula.

Until Inchon, we were fighting a losing battle. Then when the Chinese stepped in, the game was destined to be lost.

Land wars in Asia usually end that way when Chinese armies get involved.

31 posted on 01/05/2003 8:39:13 PM PST by fogarty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: fogarty
"Some 14,000 tubes of North Korean artillery are laid on their priority targets..."

I have witnessed a "Time on Target" exercise involving sixteen battalions of Artillery. I was impressed, and I don't impress easily.

I cannot even IMAGINE what a million artillery rounds fired in the space of few hours would do. But I do know that I wouldn't want to be under them.

32 posted on 01/05/2003 8:39:42 PM PST by RANGERAIRBORNE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Steel Wolf
The air power we have is unparalleled, but to counter this the North has placed literaly hundreds of sabotures in the South . . .

A point that can only be truly appreciated by someone who has been to our bases in South Korea. Especially at Osan, dense thickets of houses and shacks are built up right to the fence. It is an open secret that these places are or will be infested with North Korean sappers and saboteurs from the first shot on.

Perimeter and base security cannot be a pleasant or easy job in Korea.

33 posted on 01/05/2003 8:42:20 PM PST by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
Then the Pentagon is guilty of criminal negligence. That is a serious charge. Our troops should be withdrawn, and we should announce that any invasion would be met with weapons of mass destruction, which may or may not include nukes.
34 posted on 01/05/2003 8:43:00 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Torie
14,000 tubes of artillery tends to lend itself to being a good amount of destruction in a short amount of time.

If North Korea invades, all bets are off - there simply isn't the manpower anywhere near to stop them before Seoul. Those 35,000 or so US troops would be little more than speed bumps to the million man army (with millions more in reserves) which is on the border right now.

Right now the entire United States can muster about 12 ground combat divisions - tops. We've decimated our military so greatly that even winning a second Korean War is doubtful.

35 posted on 01/05/2003 8:44:05 PM PST by fogarty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Torie
So you are saying that the Pentagon thinks that the N. Koreans could launch a surprise attack, and we could do little about it until after our troops were killed, and Seoul destroyed? I don't believe it.

Believe it. It's policy. Read RANGERAIRBORNE's post about the tripwire effect. What varies, depending on the time of year, and their level of mobilization (which they bump up and down to try and get our goat), is the amount of time we'd have to notify our units to prepare to receive fire.

It is theoretically possible for them to hit us with absolutely no warning, but the 'sucker punch' option would have to sacrifice their own preparations, and they'd not be in a position to exploit our shock. What is more likely is that during one of their many train ups, they'd pass the go code and move South, hoping to catch us off guard.

36 posted on 01/05/2003 8:46:12 PM PST by Steel Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry
When I was working with the ROK Airborne, a police captain shot and killed a N. Korean agent just outside the gate. The moron had gone into a little tobacco shop and asked for a brand of cigarrettes sold only in North Korea!!!

Moral: Smoking can be dangerous to your health!

37 posted on 01/05/2003 8:46:23 PM PST by RANGERAIRBORNE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: fogarty; Kevin Curry
To which I say ... Field Tactical Nukes ...

Kevin Curry, correct, most of the Korean peninsula was taken by the NKs, and it was the actions in their rear, ie. Inchon, etc that may have forestalled a complete conventional defeat. I question the resolve of Truman and Eisenhower to wage any wars after the WW2 days. Maybe MacArthur was right.. We should have used whatever was necessary to stem the tide of the Yellow/Red menace. It only set the stage for the 60s and the Vietnam police action/undeclared war. MO
38 posted on 01/05/2003 8:49:31 PM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: RANGERAIRBORNE
The most I've seen was about 10 battalions. And they used VT, which was most impressive. We later saw one regiment shooting DPICM (they don't do that too often in peacetime training) - and it was devastating. I cannot imagine what it would be like trying to defend a position under that kind of firepower.
39 posted on 01/05/2003 8:49:36 PM PST by fogarty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: fogarty
to the million man army (with millions more in reserves) which is on the border right now.

Another good point. The North Korean military has 1.2 million active duty, with nearly a million on the DMZ, but that's just their invasion force.

As reinforcements, they have several organizations. The Reserves are a full 800,000, and can be used as maneuver units. The Worker-Peasant Red Guard militia at around 3.8 million total manpower, but they are more restricted to their local area. Also, the Red Youth Guards have roughly a million under arms, with reasonalby good basic infantry skills. Sprinkle on another 120,000 or so security personnel, and you have a whole lotta people under arms.

40 posted on 01/05/2003 8:54:29 PM PST by Steel Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-126 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson