[Texaggie79]

Ok, lemme take ya'll to real estate appraiser school for a minute.

NO ONE REALLY owns property. You do not REALLY own your own property dcwusmc. You only own a bundle of rights to it. The physical land is not your's. Technically ALL land in the US is physically owned by the government. You don't own the air rights, you may or may not own the mineral rights (if you are in a subdivision or town you probably don't). Building rights......... if you are in town, you need a permit.


If you want to know what rights you own to the property you think you own, go to the courthouse and pull an abstract. Therein, you will see which rights you have to the property.

[Roscoe]

If you want to know what rights you own to the property you think you own, go to the courthouse and pull an abstract.

What!? You mean I can't cut down the telephone pole sitting on my land and use it for firewood?

It's socialism I tells ya!!!

[tpaine]

Yes, of course aggie.
We are all well aware that you consider yourself an expert in contractural/property/title matters.
We can only hope your customers get/have good insurance.

But tell me. -- If you buy into a condo development in your state, could the condo association insert a clause in the contract [prior to your signing of course] specifying that they can inspect your property at any time, without notice, for any violation of the association rules?
- [Said rules being subject to change at any time by majority vote, of course.]

-- And, --- that the penalty for a refusal to inspect would be an immediate eviction, pending a forced sale of your unit?

Is this basic scenario constitutional, in your opinion?

[dcwusmc]

Kindly post cites for these truly amazing claims. Such things may have been asserted by George III, but the Founding Dads set that aright with the Constitution. Please justify your claim with actual cites of law and Constitution.