Could the wall be evidence of another Saddam/terrorist link to
Disney, ABC and Pierre Jennings? Inquiring minds want to know more.
Posted on 04/16/2003 4:03:56 AM PDT by PJ-Comix
ABC's Peter Jennings sees an ominous new threat in the world. Not weapons of mass destruction or terrorism, but another vast right-wing conspiracy at home, specifically, the supposedly "well organized and aggressive efforts to make life very difficult for celebrities who speak out against the war."
Jennings ended Tuesday's World News Tonight with this plug for Wednesday's show: "That is our report on World News Tonight. Tomorrow on the broadcast, the well organized and aggressive efforts to make life very difficult for celebrities who speak out against the war. I'm Peter Jennings. Have a good evening, and good night."
I can't wait to hear how all the celebrities who were regularly appearing on cable news before the war were suppressed. And if people choose not to watch their shows or buy their CDs, that's the free market and the public just expressing its disagreement with their views.
Apparently Jennings doesn't consider it newsworthy to examine how celebrities erroneously predicted disastrous events would result from the war or whether some owe an apology, like Janeane Garofalo who promised that she'd admit it if she were proven wrong. (See item #7 below for more on Garofalo.)
That's probably because he too would have to admit that he was wrong.
Jennings' agenda is probably inspired by some recent whining from actor Tim Robbins, who was Tuesday's luncheon speaker at the National Press Club. On Monday's Today show, prompted by the Baseball Hall of Fame cancelling an appearance by him, Robbins contended that the message is that "if you would disagree with this administration you can and will be punished."
MRC analyst Geoffrey Dickens caught how on the April 14 Today Matt Lauer tossed up a bunch of softballs to Robbins, who used Baseball Hall of Fame President Dale Petroskey's decision to cancel an event marking the 15th anniversary of the movie Bull Durham in which Robbins starred, as an excuse to spout off about how he's being oppressed.
Robbins charged: "He basically says that if you do not agree with this President you don't have the right to this particular forum. You do not have the right to come to Cooperstown. Which is a very punitive and, and aggressive kind of way of dealing with the situation....And by doing it in the public way he did, by sending it to the AP at the same time he's sending it to me he's trying to, he's trying to send a message out which is basically, if you would disagree with this administration you can and will be punished."
Robbins echoed himself: "We're sending out messages to the public on an almost daily basis that they have no right to protest against this President." Matt Lauer cued up Robbins: "So when the Dixie Chicks say, 'I'm embarrassed by President Bush being from Texas,' radio stations pull their music and people stomp on their CDs." Robbins spun a conspiracy tale: "But let's not forget the connection between Clear Channel or the Bush administration or the connection between Petroskey and the Reagan administration and prominent Republicans that he's worked for including Elizabeth Dole. This is, this is an endemic problem and it's a terrible situation, a terrible message to be sending out."
If Robbins fears Elizabeth Dole, about as mushy a moderate as you can find, he really has insecurity issues.
Lauer tossed Robbins another softball pitch: "How did this climate get created, in your opinion?" Robbins: "We are fighting, we are fighting for freedom for the Iraqi people right now, so that they can have the freedom of speech, yet we are telling our own citizens that they have to be quiet at home, that they have to acquiesce to this president in a time of war. And he said, okay, he said, 'This war will be lasting a long, long time.' So when can we disagree with him?" Lauer finally challenged him: "You, you've said in the past you think this is a war based largely on oil. When, when you see the scenes of people celebrating in the streets of Baghdad and tearing down statues, does it change your opinion as to our need to go in there at all?" Robbins is still unmoved: "No, I am ecstatic that they feel this freedom. I hope that they, that we have the resolve to, to get in there and make it work. So far we've lost our focus on Afghanistan, it seems to me. And, and we have a terrible track record as far as our military leading to democracy. Look at Panama, look at Nicaragua. It's not, it's not in our best interest for some reason to keep it going."
Back for a second round after the 8:25am local news break, Lauer re-cued Robbins for his spiel: "What do you think about the climate we're living in right now where the Dixie Chicks records are pulled, where Madonna pulls a music video because she's afraid that people will misinterpret as anti-war, anti-troops?" Robbins: "Yeah, well it's, it's kind of scary. It's kind of scary because not, not because of me or Susan or, you know, the, her United Way thing being cancelled or the Baseball Hall of Fame. Those things are in, in the radar, we get, we get to talk about them, we get to discuss them and we get to, you know call Dale Petroskey to the, to the carpet on, on his actions. What, across the country this kind of stuff is happening on a daily basis. We were just down in Florida this weekend at a family reunion and almost everyone I talked to was telling me about something in a school, in a local district, that is not being reported, about, you know kids being intimidated for anti-war views, people being suspended for wearing peace signs. An event cancelled because they chose to pray for Iraqi civilians that were killed. Really crazy stuff. A disc, one of these, a talk radio person in the South calling for the murder of Hollywood celeb, a particular Hollywood celebrity. Crazy stuff. What is going on here?" Lauer: "You mention timing. I mean it seems as if the rules is if troops are engaged do not criticize." Robbins: "We will have troops engaged and we have had troops engaged for the last 20 years somewhere in the world. It's not, you can't go on that, on that basis. This war, according to the President, is going to last a very long time. Do we cancel the next election because we can't criticize this guy? Why, why are they so concerned? Why can't they engage in the debate of it? Don't they have points that they have to, that they can make. I mean the problem is we are dealing with a, with a situation where people are, are abdicating their First Amendment rights in fear. This is not what we, what this country is built on. We, we are supposed to be able to vigorously talk about issues and debate subjects."
How exactly are you being silenced when the most-watched national morning television show gives you a platform?
For a picture of Robbins and a rundown of his film roles, check the page for him on the Internet Movie Database: http://us.imdb.com/Name?Robbins,+Tim
Feels more like a cool breeze to me Tim. Say what you want, just do not expect everyone to agree with you, and do expect those that don't to avoid your movies & disinvite you to their events.
Excellent point. I am reminded of Sen. Lott's unfortunate remarks which ended up costing him his leadership position. He was excercising free speech and it is clear that his remarks were misconstrued, but nonetheless, he was toast. No immunity from those consequences. Ditto for Newt Gingrinch, who was vilified for a few remarks taken out of context.
The left is trying to pull a fast one here and we can't let them get away with it.
Nobody is stopping you from coming to Cooperstown.
BUY A TICKET LIKE EVERYONE ELSE.
OK Tim, Why were you so silent for the past 20 years huh? I didn't once hear you or the hag you're married to utter a peep when we had a non-U.N. sanctioned war in Kosovo. Your silence was deafening about Hati, and what about all the cruise missiles being lobbed into Baghdad in 1998 (Remember operation Desert Fox?). Why weren't you and Susan complaining then? Instead you were busy kissing the feet of THAT war-mongering president.
Prayer.......in school?????
Funny, I never saw anything in the Constitution about a "right" to go to a party in Cooperstown.
You were disinvited, idiot. There were no "rights" abridged.
'elp! 'elp! I'm being repressed! Come see the violence inherent in the system!
My thought, too. And, what about Panama? Say what you will about our chummy relationship with Noriega in the early 80’s, he had gone over the edge. He had to be stopped. Since then, Panama has been in good shape. Nicaragua? We were never allowed to go in there.
The leftists/socialist/marxist actors feel so morally and intellectually superior to us that only their viewpoint on anything is the correct one. Guess again Hollyweird! It's quite obvious that we're winning - we're hurting you where it counts - in your pocketbooks! The public made you what you are and we will tear you down!!!!
Chill wind? Through the White House?
Sounds like he needs a tin-foil hat.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.