Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Israel TV Channel 2 Interview with Powell
Jerusalem Post ^ | May. 12, 2003 | JOEL LEYDEN

Posted on 05/11/2003 7:51:47 PM PDT by yonif

The following is an interview between Israel's Channel Two TV and Secretary of State Colin L. Powell

QUESTION: Secretary of State, Mr. Colin Powell, Shalom and thank you for this interview.

SECRETARY POWELL: Shalom, thank you.

QUESTION: You have just returned from a meeting with the new Palestinian Prime Minister, Abu Mazen. In your opinion, is he able to deliver? Can he really crack down on terrorists?

SECRETARY POWELL: He intends to deliver. He intends to serve effectively as the Prime Minister of the Palestinian people. I was impressed by his commitment to moving forward with the peace process. He knows that in order to move forward there must be an end to terror; there must be an end to violence. I think he knows it cannot just be a temporary thing; it has to be a permanent choice on the part of the Palestinian leadership that the militant activities, the terrorist activities, and organizations such as Hamas and Islamic Jihad and others have to come to an end. So, he understands that and we will have to see in the days ahead how he acts, how he puts together his security forces and whether he can convince the Palestinian people that this is the correct course for them to take in the future. He will also have challenges ahead as he deals with these strong organizations. I am convinced that he will take the message to the Palestinian people and then as he gathers authority and strength he will deal with these kinds of organizations.

QUESTION: But how can he do it if Arafat still controls most of the Palestinian security organizations?

SECRETARY POWELL: Well, Arafat controls some, he controls some. There is a bifurcated situation right now, which I would rather not see, but this is the way it is. He does have a very accomplished and effective Minister for Security, Mohammed Dahlan, who has experience and has dealt with these kinds of problems before. He has other members of his cabinet who have experience in these matters. And so, we will be doing everything we can to assist him and provide him with support. U.S. organizations will be helping rebuild their security apparatus, and he has made the commitment. We will see how it turns out. But, obviously, there are some challenges between the authority that he has and the authority that Mr. Arafat still retains. What is important here is that the Palestinian people have spoken and said we want transformed leadership. It was quite a debate within the Palestinian legislature about what kind of authority this Prime Minister should have. The very fact that they have a Prime Minister is a step forward. Abu Mazen was able to fight off pressures for him not to be the Prime Minister. So, you take it one step at a time. I think the steps we have seen recently with the creation of the position, with the appointment and confirmation of Prime Minister Abbas, these are all important steps, but they are initial steps and now we have to support him as he moves forward.

QUESTION: Today, you heard from Prime Minister Sharon at length about the necessity of settlement activity and settlements. In your opinion, is he really capable of dismantling even one settlement? Have you ever heard him raise that option?

SECRETARY POWELL: I don't want to speculate on what the Prime Minister is capable of or not capable or doing. He is a very capable man. He has demonstrated his leadership over the many years of his service to the State of Israel, to the people of Israel. But, what we talked about was the fact that the settlements are a problem. There is a question in the minds of Palestinians and questions in the minds of many people around the world as to whether or not one can actually bring into being a viable Palestinian state without doing something about the settlement activity and the outposts and the settlements that are there. This will be one of the most difficult issues we have to deal with. I think dealing with the outpost is easier than ending settlement activity and ending settlement activity is easier than what one might do about settlements in the future as you try to create a state. So, I am not in any way underestimating the difficulties ahead. President Bush believes, and by the way he is firmly committed to moving forward, he is committed to the roadmap, he is committed to his vision of June 24, and he expects to speak to the Prime Minister in very open, straightforward, honest, candid terms about settlement activity and settlements in general when he sees Prime Minister Sharon next week.

QUESTION: Is a meeting between both Prime Ministers possible while you are still here in the area? Are you working to arrange such a meeting?

SECRETARY POWELL: Well, I think it is unlikely since I will be leaving in the morning. But, I spoke to both Prime Ministers about the importance of the two Prime Ministers, Prime Minister Abbas and Prime Minister Sharon, getting together as soon as possible, and I leave encouraged by my conversations with both of them that this can happen in the near future.

QUESTION: Mr. Secretary, following your short visit here, are you able to confirm to Israelis and Palestinians that are listening to you right now that America is just as determined to end this conflict as it was to remove the dictatorship in Baghdad?

SECRETARY POWELL: Yes, there is no question in my mind. In fact, now that the dictatorship in Baghdad is gone, we have an opportunity to build a better life for the Iraqi people under a democratic form of government. The threat to Israel is also gone and, with the appointment of Prime Minister Abbas, we have a new situation here, and with roadmap we have a new element, and so the strategic situation has changed. The President has made it clear to anyone he has spoken to recently that this now becomes the focus of his attention with respect to foreign policy. He has said all along that the Middle East peace process is something he is going to invest time and energy and political capital in. Coming out of the Iraqi conflict, he has more political capital that it is possible for him to invest. So, there is no doubt in my mind, and he and I have spoken quite frequently about this over the past week or so, that he is committed to moving this process forward. He will do what it takes with respect to his personal involvement to make that happen.

QUESTION: Including sending a presidential envoy to the area?

SECRETARY POWELL: Well, we're looking at how best to move the process forward, what participation should we be having, should have? He will be involved. I will be involved. Of course, our Ambassador and our Consul General here will be involved, and we're looking at others who might play a role, coordinators here on the ground, special envoys. All of those options are open to us, and we are looking at now.

The important thing, though, is to get started, to get started with moves on both sides, and Prime Minister Sharon indicated to me a number of steps that the Israeli government will be taking in the very near future, over the next several days.

In my conversation with Prime Minister Abbas, I made it very very clear that we are all expecting action on their side, to bring down threats and terrorism and violence, in order to create the proper atmosphere so that both sides can then take the next step. So a lot of discussion about very difficult issues, with respect to settlements, with respect to the right of return, with respect to the final status of Jerusalem. All of those are difficult, they've been difficult for decades. Let's put them in proper place and proper perspective, and let's get started now, because if we don't get started now, if we don't deal with these immediate issues that are before us, then we'll always be grasping at something in the future that we can never really reach.

QUESTION: Previously, the United States, President Bush and yourself, asked Prime Minister Sharon not to physically harm Yasser Arafat. After what we see in Iraq, including the assassination attempt on Saddam Hussein, is that still valid?

SECRETARY POWELL: It is still valid in the sense that Mr. Sharon has not changed his position on that and he has not communicated his position to me or to President Bush in any way that he's changed his position. But frankly, in the course of my conversations today, we did not spend much time at all on Mr. Arafat.

QUESTION: In the operation in Iraq, the United States used targeted killings, roadblocks, and also there are many civilians that were injured and killed. At the same time, the United States criticized Israel for using the same standard here. Don't you think that this is a double standard?

SECRETARY POWELL: I think there is a difference between the two sorts of activities in Iraq. We were in an active war, declared conflict, and we were going after command and control. I recognize that Israel has a position that if it sees somebody coming at them with the intent of conducting a terror act, that it is a legitimate act of self-defense to do that. But when it goes beyond legitimate acts of self-defense and a real and present danger of somebody coming at you, to a more expansive set of targeted assassinations, as they're called, how effective is this in terms of actually moving forward with the process? So, we have always spoken out against these kinds of actions, and we hoped that they can be contained in the future. If both sides move forward down the first stages of the roadmap, hopefully confidence can be built, and the Palestinians can become more effective in dealing with these kinds of threats, so that this kind of activity won't be necessary.

QUESTION: Mr. Secretary, last week you said that President Assad of Syria lied to you. What makes you believe that he doesn't do it again, especially after an interview to Newsweek when he said that he is not going to close the terror organization offices, and he's not going to crack down on Hezbollah?

SECRETARY POWELL: He did mislead me once before. It is not a matter of me believing him or not believing him now, it's a matter of what he does. What I said to him very clearly is there are things that we believe he should do if he wants a better relationship with the United States, if he wants to play a helpful role in solving the crisis here in the region, and frankly if he wants to have good relations with a neighbor of his that will have a new government, a government that I believe will be very pro-American, very pro-Western, and will not view with favor any efforts on the part of Syria to either destabilize Iraq or to continue its terrorist support activities in Israel and in the territories.

So I believe that President Bashar al-Assad has every incentive to respond to the issues that I put before him last weekend. If he chooses not to respond, if he chooses to dissemble, if he chooses to find excuses, then he will find that he is on the wrong side of history. He will find that he will not have better relations with the United States, and he can take his choice. Does he want to have good relations with the United States? Or does he want to have good relations with Hamas? His choice.

QUESTION: You enjoy impressive popularity in the United States. Is the presidential race in 2008 an option for you?

SECRETARY POWELL: 2008?

QUESTION: After President Bush, is that something that you consider?

SECRETARY POWELL: No. Do you know how old I will be in 2008? It will be time for, I will be well into retirement by then. I have no political ambitions, but thank you.

QUESTION: Last question. I know that you grew up in Brooklyn, and I heard that you know some Yiddish, and people here are dying to hear it from you.

SECRETARY POWELL: Abissalleh, Abissalleh [a little]. I don't know much Yiddish.

QUESTION: Is there an item in Yiddish that can describe the situation here in the Middle East, in Yiddish?

SECRETARY POWELL: I don't think I want to speculate on what single Yiddish word can capture the whole situation in the Middle East, but I would say that I'm proud of the fact that in my youth, I lived in a neighborhood that had a large Jewish population and during that period, I worked for a wonderful Russian Jew in a toy store, and I learned a lot about the Jewish culture and faith. And I learned a few words of Yiddish in my youth, most of which I've now lost, but it still forms one of the fondest, fondest parts of my childhood memories, and it is for that reason that when I come to Israel, those old memories are revived, and I am revived, in my desire to do everything I can to help the people of Israel, to help the Jewish people find peace in this land, living side by side, in peace, with the other people who occupy this land, the Palestinians.

QUESTION: (inaudible)

QUESTION: Mr. Secretary, thank you very much for your time.

SECRETARY POWELL: Thank you very much.

QUESTION: Thank you.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; Israel; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: channel2; israel; powell; usa
1. Israel still has a threat coming from Syria 2. On the Iraq question, Israel is in an active war, declared conflict, and going after the command and control. Just like the US is doing. Powell should not give Israel the crap that Israel is going beyond legitimate acts of self-defense. How effective is the US moving forward with the process in Iraq by it targeting terrorists? Give me a break.
1 posted on 05/11/2003 7:51:47 PM PDT by yonif
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yonif
Powell is dishing out the usual set of lies coming from the State dept.
2 posted on 05/11/2003 7:56:36 PM PDT by LarryM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LarryM
"Powell is dishing out the usual set of lies coming from the State dept."

Larry,

The problem is not that the State Dept. is intentionally lying, which they aren't. They believe that Abu Mazen has good intentions, which he does not. He will be unable or unwilling to stop the terrorism of Hamas and other Palestinian terrorist groups, and if he tries to stop them he will be assassinated, just like Sadat. The problem is the naivete of the State Dept. who take Arab people at face value by what they say, not by what they do.

The problem will come if the US pressures Israel to make concessions based upon its trust in Abu Mazen. That could prove to be disastrous to Israel.


3 posted on 05/11/2003 8:15:08 PM PDT by Tom Jefferson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yonif

Look, if we were stupid enough to sanction an assassination of Arafat by the Israelis, that would set our diplomacy back several years while creating yet another martyr for the Jihadis. Any hope of moderate political development in the cesspool of the West Bank and Gaza would be lost.

No, let Arafat be the victim of some vengeful Hamas fanatic who thinks that Arafat has "gone soft" on the Jews. Now, if the Mossad could find a way to tell this fanatic where Arafat would be at a certain time and place? Well, maybe.....

I don't care if Arafat gets rubbed out tomorrow. Just as long as Israel and the U.S. can claim clean hands.

As to the Syrians, well, Bashar is not made of the same stuff as the old man was made of. Bashar can be frightened. He can also be sweet talked into a deal on the Golan, if he is given the proper incentives and threats. An early sign will be Hezboallah. Watch them. If they move against American personnel in then Middle East, it's a sign that Damascus is testing us. We have to respond with overwhelming force and literally clean out the Bekaa in a matter that will make the IDF look like a bunch of girl scouts by comparison. Then watch the Syrians come running up to the teacher's desk, apple in hand.

Arabs respond to strength. Remember that, because George W. has never forgotten it.

Be Seeing You,

Chris Be Seeing You,

Chris

4 posted on 05/11/2003 8:15:11 PM PDT by section9 (Major Kusanagi: back from vacation! Tanned, rested, and ready.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yonif
He intends to serve effectively as the Prime Minister of the Palestinian people

These would be the same folks that danced in the streets, their woman ulanatating joyously when they learned of the terrorist strikes in NY City and at the Pentagon which killed several thousand Americans and our guests? Those Palistinian People? .... I thought so.

5 posted on 05/11/2003 10:31:51 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yonif
I will be well into retirement by then

Interesting choice of words. 2008 is the end of Bush's second term, and he'll be "well into" retirement by then. Guess he isn't planning on sticking around much longer.

6 posted on 05/12/2003 1:26:36 AM PDT by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LarryM
"Powell is dishing out the usual set of lies coming from the State dept."

Some things only change for the worse.
7 posted on 05/12/2003 4:55:29 AM PDT by wgeorge2001 ("The truth will set you free.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson