To: hchutch
Sorry. WMDs were the only justifiable reason. The others could have been--and were--shot down immediately.
27 posted on
06/09/2003 1:16:52 PM PDT by
jammer
To: jammer
right--sponsorship of international terrorism is only a minor concern.
50 posted on
06/09/2003 1:45:02 PM PDT by
Republican Wildcat
(Help us elect Republicans in Kentucky! Click on my name for links to all the 2003 candidates!)
To: jammer
Sure and the terrorist camps destroyed and tons of weaponry including suicide vests could have never been used against Americans, could they?
Terrorist ties were the most important reason to destroy Saddam. Removing him has undercut our enemies across the globe. He sponsored/assisted at least three terrorist attacks within this country. No more
Information agreed to across the globe clearly showed weapons programs and the existence of weapons. If he had nothing to hide, why did he work so hard at impeding the inspectors? Why didn't he just show the world that he had destroyed everything? A world willing to suspend disbelief in order to humiliate Bush? There is only one rational answer to that question.
52 posted on
06/09/2003 1:48:31 PM PDT by
justshutupandtakeit
(RATS will use any means to denigrate George Bush's Victory.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson