Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hchutch
Sorry. WMDs were the only justifiable reason. The others could have been--and were--shot down immediately.
27 posted on 06/09/2003 1:16:52 PM PDT by jammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: jammer
right--sponsorship of international terrorism is only a minor concern.
50 posted on 06/09/2003 1:45:02 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat (Help us elect Republicans in Kentucky! Click on my name for links to all the 2003 candidates!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: jammer
Sure and the terrorist camps destroyed and tons of weaponry including suicide vests could have never been used against Americans, could they?

Terrorist ties were the most important reason to destroy Saddam. Removing him has undercut our enemies across the globe. He sponsored/assisted at least three terrorist attacks within this country. No more

Information agreed to across the globe clearly showed weapons programs and the existence of weapons. If he had nothing to hide, why did he work so hard at impeding the inspectors? Why didn't he just show the world that he had destroyed everything? A world willing to suspend disbelief in order to humiliate Bush? There is only one rational answer to that question.
52 posted on 06/09/2003 1:48:31 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (RATS will use any means to denigrate George Bush's Victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson