[jwalsh07]

Does anybody here seriously think that the SC would allow sex with children, if it somehow made it all the way there

The Europenas have been liberalising their child protection laws for years. This SCOTUS looks to Europe for guidance on matters of mores when ruling against states in America that are guaranteed, supposedly, the tenth amendment.

Doesn't seem like much of a stretch to me.

As evidence I offer Roe and Doe. Roe originally allowed abortion in the first trimester. Doe expanded that to killing them on the way out.

And now we have learned men such as Singer at Princeton who wants to extend that to two years after exiting the womb and Watson who has decided that the Nazi's were right after all vis a vis eugenics.

All things are possible in a world where moral absolutes have gone the way of the Pony Express.

[Sabertooth]

Heck, does anyone think Peter Singer would deny an animal the right to have sex with a human?

[Houmatt]

And now we have learned men such as Singer at Princeton who wants to extend that to two years after exiting the womb

I had heard he said a month. Are you sure it is two years?