Skip to comments.
NASA: Planet Formed 13 Billion Years Ago
Yahoo! News ^
| 7/10/03
| Deborah Zabarenko - Reuters
Posted on 07/10/2003 6:56:07 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-86 next last
To: meandog
5600 years is a blink of an eye in a 13 billion year existence. It's probably still there.
21
posted on
07/11/2003 3:16:09 AM PDT
by
Junior
("Eat recycled food. It's good for the environment and okay for you...")
To: 11th Earl of Mar
Different department.
22
posted on
07/11/2003 3:17:26 AM PDT
by
Junior
("Eat recycled food. It's good for the environment and okay for you...")
To: longshadow
From the article:
The old planet is located near the heart of a globular star cluster some 5,600 light-years from Earth in the constellation Scorpius. A light-year is about 6 trillion miles, about the distance light travels in a year.
Journalism triumphs again. A light-year is
about the distance light travels in a year. Yeah. More or less.
23
posted on
07/11/2003 3:17:58 AM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.)
To: Prodigal Son
And stop calling him Shirley (surely)!
24
posted on
07/11/2003 3:22:43 AM PDT
by
NCLaw441
To: NormsRevenge
...a whirling pulsar and a white dwarf... They zoomed in on Bill Clinton standing with Robert B. Reich?
25
posted on
07/11/2003 3:47:48 AM PDT
by
LRS
To: js1138
Thanks for the ping ;)
26
posted on
07/11/2003 4:16:00 AM PDT
by
BMCDA
To: Orangedog
There's a difference between believeing something didn't happen because it isn't reported in the Bible and believing it didn't happen because it contradicts what is reported in the Bible. I'm not aware of any, much less most, YECs doing the former.
To: MitchellC
Like I said, I've never seen them in action here, so I don't know their entire side of the argument. I guess it could all come down to how long a day is for God. Today started for me around 6:00 AM EST. His might have started when he told Noah to build a big boat.
28
posted on
07/11/2003 6:00:35 AM PDT
by
Orangedog
(Soccer-Moms are the biggest threat to your freedoms and the republic !)
To: NormsRevenge
bump
29
posted on
07/11/2003 6:12:03 AM PDT
by
Sam Cree
(Democrats are herd animals)
To: Orangedog
Your original post just came across like some very uninformed razzing, no offense.
As an aside, though, it seems to me that the YECs are at least provided with a consistent worldview for justifying their conservatism, which materialists/atheists, etc., lack.
To: longshadow
Wicked cool! This discovery is pretty interesting, isn't it?
Placemarker for long thread life!
31
posted on
07/11/2003 6:16:07 AM PDT
by
ThinkPlease
(Fortune Favors the Bold!)
To: 11th Earl of Mar
I would think NASA would be spending this time and money on finding out the cause of the Columbia explosion.I think they (the engineers) knew what caused it before it happened and the only thing to be resolved is management listening to the engineers.
To: PatrickHenry
Journalism triumphs again. A light-year is about the distance light travels in a year. Yeah. More or less. Yeah, give or take a light-year. LOL. Good pickup.
33
posted on
07/11/2003 6:52:42 AM PDT
by
jalisco555
(Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain.)
To: af_vet_rr
I think NASA should be spending its time and money on figuring how to do re-entry into the atmosphere at less than 490898475945723945349 miles per hour.
Other wise it's going to make mining Mars and Pluto a lot more expensive.
34
posted on
07/11/2003 6:56:52 AM PDT
by
kjam22
To: 11th Earl of Mar
I would think NASA would be spending this time and money on finding out the cause of the Columbia explosion. Ya, I'm sure the cosmologists stationed at various observatories around the world could help by examining the shuttle rubble for clues. (sarcasm)
Maybe you know of someone who is an expert on how foam planets interact with tile planets.
Get serious.
To: Dr._Joseph_Warren
If you think that it is money well spent for the federal government to pay people to guesstimate how old the universe is, YOU need to get serious.
To: MitchellC
What the devilare you talking about?
You have to be religious fanatic in order to be conservative?
You have to be a fundamentalist in order to have a consistent worldview?
Where do you live? Geez?
You sir, need to get a grip.
37
posted on
07/11/2003 8:05:29 AM PDT
by
Aric2000
(If the history of science shows us anything, it is that we get nowhere by labeling our ignorance god)
To: Aric2000
Interesting (re: post #8) how the fight against Darwin seems to leak into physics. I wonder, if Darwin had never published, whether there would be people fighting the teaching of physics in public schools, since physicists believe in the religion of physical laws. Hey, it's in their name.
38
posted on
07/11/2003 8:17:30 AM PDT
by
js1138
To: 11th Earl of Mar
If you think that it is money well spent for the federal government to pay people to guesstimate how old the universe is, YOU need to get serious. Every now and then things come into focus. This was the post of the week for sure.
39
posted on
07/11/2003 8:20:00 AM PDT
by
kjam22
To: kjam22
You suppose there are people who don't want us to know the age of the universe?
40
posted on
07/11/2003 8:24:25 AM PDT
by
js1138
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-86 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson