Provide examples, and then differentiate the uncertainty surrounding the number of missing from Srebrenica with the declining numbers of missing reported from the WTC attack.
When large numbers of people are killed, it takes time to arrive at accurate numbers, this has happened for both the WTC and Srebrenica, and has taken much the same course with the exception that we didn't have to deal with Al Qaeda removing bodies from the WTC to secondary graves in an attempt to lessen their crime, and we don't have to put up with the ignorant attempting to lessen their crime through use of the uncertainties as to the "accurate to within one person" death toll.
What of the physical proof from the names declared dead later showing up in the U.S.A or in various regions of Bosnia?
Cite your supposed physical proof - hell, I'll even take documentary proof linked in your response in place of you sending live persons to my door: you will find 9 names that were duplicated upon the Tuzla voter registration rolls and the Srebrenica missing lists that were subsequently removed from the count of the missing - even though voter registration fraud was found to be the most likely cause. You have made a claim, and I fully expect this discussion to go the way of most Balkans thread issues - when challenged to provide supporting evidence, you will instead choose to talk your way around the lack of support for your position.
Prove me wrong.
What this issue boils down to is the Bosnian Serbs murdered upwards of 7,500 men and boys in pursuit of an illegitimate and indefensible policy which you now find yourself attempting to defend.
You have chosen the wrong fight, AD.