Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/21/2003 7:32:39 PM PDT by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
To: Howlin; Ed_NYC; MonroeDNA; widgysoft; Springman; Timesink; dubyaismypresident; Grani; coug97; ...
You have the right for me to kill you if you come within a quarter mile of my daughter again....

Just damn.

If you want on the new list, FReepmail me. This IS a high-volume PING list...

2 posted on 08/21/2003 7:33:30 PM PDT by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mhking
"...a lawyer for one of them contends 14-year-olds have a right to privacy that allows them to consent to sex with each other, and has challenged the constitutionality of the law."

I really don't think I'd want this case to come before the SCOTUS. At least, not the way it is currently constituted...

4 posted on 08/21/2003 7:37:12 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mhking
Something tells me this thread title's gonna get FR a lot of Google hits.
6 posted on 08/21/2003 7:40:44 PM PDT by Gumption
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mhking
Don Linke, the boy's attorney, argues that children's privacy rights include the right to make "important decisions."

Children aren't ready to make important decisions like these. That's what parents are for.
9 posted on 08/21/2003 7:46:43 PM PDT by gsrinok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mhking
We are overlooking the most important thing in this case. Were they going to use a condom?
10 posted on 08/21/2003 7:53:37 PM PDT by exit82 (Constitution?--I got your Constitution right here!--T. Daschle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mhking
Teens have right to have sex, lawyer argues (Huh?!?)

I thought this was considered settled law, based on the high-caliber reasonings embedded in
the penumbra of lyrics from Cyndie Lauper and some rap artists.
(end sarcasm...even if it's probably effectively true)
11 posted on 08/21/2003 7:53:42 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mhking
...the statute is intended to prevent older teenagers or adults from abusing or exploiting younger, more vulnerable children, not to prohibit consensual sex among teenagers.

Exactly right. The INTENT of the law is to criminalize adults who sexually prey upon and exploit children. Criminally prosecuting two children for sex (which is not by force) is ridiculous.

This kind of action is why Statutory Rape laws and age-of-consent limits are under assault by some Liberals.

13 posted on 08/21/2003 7:55:40 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mhking
What is the story that is not reported?

The mother of the girl is a single mom and the girl's father was thus not present to beat the crap out of the 14-year-old punk.

14 posted on 08/21/2003 7:57:52 PM PDT by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mhking
Teenagers have a right to make decisions for having sex and abortions, however at 14 they are not legally allowed to work.
I'd say the age of "consent" should begin once you're old enough to stay out past curfew and earn a living, until then they're juveniles.
15 posted on 08/21/2003 8:12:28 PM PDT by The Brush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mhking
They are saying these kids have ADD? What a crock! If the girl is already on probation there is a much better reason for her(and his) "activities". It's called no parental guidance, and no but whippings. Why did the mother call the cops on her own daughter? There is obviously no adult around that ever really gave a sh*t about either of these kids.
16 posted on 08/21/2003 8:15:07 PM PDT by vpintheak (Our Liberties we prize, and our rights we will maintain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gcruse
Don Linke, the boy's attorney, argues that children's privacy rights include the right to make "important decisions."

This all sounds so damned libertarian to me. Where, oh where will it stop?

17 posted on 08/21/2003 8:16:55 PM PDT by Scenic Sounds (Conservatism never really loses; it simply changes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mhking
Neither is being named because of their ages. Don Linke, the boy's attorney, argues that children's privacy rights include the right to make "important decisions." "One of those types of decisions is whether to engage in sexual relations," says Linke

Neither is being named because of their ages, but they're old enough and have the right to make such important decisions as to play at STDs and death from AIDS, and bringing another human being into the world and having the maturity and means to care for it until maturity? Linke is one of those consciencious and wholesome family lawyers, right?

20 posted on 08/21/2003 8:25:04 PM PDT by mtbopfuyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mhking
The state sanctions adolescent sexual explorations because the state will be there to provide the safety net for stupid adolescent decisions. Who are the parents to interfere?
30 posted on 08/21/2003 9:02:48 PM PDT by spodefly (This is my tagline. There are many like it, but this one is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mhking
This mother has obviously done a great job of raising her kid.
35 posted on 08/21/2003 9:07:07 PM PDT by Capriole (Foi vainquera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mhking; GatorGirl; maryz; *Catholic_list; afraidfortherepublic; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; Askel5; ...
Ping.
40 posted on 08/21/2003 9:13:12 PM PDT by narses ("The do-it-yourself Mass is ended. Go in peace" Francis Carindal Arinze of Nigeria)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mhking
both freely admitted that their intention was to 'have sex,'

both come from troubled backgrounds and struggle with the same issues, such as attention deficit disorder

They probably would have lost interest and grabed the Playstation. ;-)

41 posted on 08/21/2003 9:13:47 PM PDT by StriperSniper (Make South Korea an island)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mhking
INTREP/SPOTREP
43 posted on 08/21/2003 9:14:12 PM PDT by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mhking
I had lots of teen sex at 16 and 17 with my girlfriend.

But if her dad had of found out my life would have been terminated. But we were pretty sure her mother knew! lol
46 posted on 08/21/2003 9:15:14 PM PDT by Fledermaus (Democrats have stunted brain development!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mhking
they act like this would never happen,

13-16 years olds screwing...nothing new there heard about it all the time in school and still do today,

Barf Alert

64 posted on 08/21/2003 9:46:08 PM PDT by MetalHeadConservative35 (Zug Island: Where jesus isnt the only thing that can walk on water)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mhking
The teens even "challenged" the woman to call police. So she did.

There would have been no police call in my home. There may have been one from a neighbor reporting "shots fired".

67 posted on 08/21/2003 10:01:07 PM PDT by Rightwing Conspiratr1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson