[Registered]

Tom McClintock is opposed to Brady and other restrictions on the constitutional right to keep and bear arms

So you believe that a McClintock Administration would have the ability to stop the gun grabbers from achieving their objective? Having these stands is one thing, but realistically speaking, having the ability to actually *do* something about them once in office is another.

[ElkGroveDan]

So you believe that a McClintock Administration would have the ability to stop the gun grabbers from achieving their objective? Having these stands is one thing, but realistically speaking, having the ability to actually *do* something about them once in office is another.

Absolutely. The governor has the power to VETO any law that passes the legislature.

[El Gato]

Having these stands is one thing, but realistically speaking, having the ability to actually *do* something about them once in office is another.

True, but if you don't want to at least try to *do* something, the possiblily of getting something done drops to zero.

[William Tell]

Registered said: "So you believe that a McClintock Administration would have the ability to stop the gun grabbers from achieving their objective? Having these stands is one thing, but realistically speaking, having the ability to actually *do* something about them once in office is another."

Imagine that Arnold wins. He then signs the new, improved Kalifornia "assault weapons" ban which adds the Springfield Armory M1A and the Ruger Mini-14 to the list of proscribed firearms.

Please tell me why he would not do this.

Please tell me how it would ever be possible for me to vote for Arnold. Any gunowner who does so is supporting his own disarmament.