Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Registered
Registered said: "So you believe that a McClintock Administration would have the ability to stop the gun grabbers from achieving their objective? Having these stands is one thing, but realistically speaking, having the ability to actually *do* something about them once in office is another."

Imagine that Arnold wins. He then signs the new, improved Kalifornia "assault weapons" ban which adds the Springfield Armory M1A and the Ruger Mini-14 to the list of proscribed firearms.

Please tell me why he would not do this.

Please tell me how it would ever be possible for me to vote for Arnold. Any gunowner who does so is supporting his own disarmament.

62 posted on 08/27/2003 3:33:58 PM PDT by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: William Tell
Imagine that Arnold wins. He then signs the new, improved Kalifornia "assault weapons" ban which adds the Springfield Armory M1A and the Ruger Mini-14 to the list of proscribed firearms. Please tell me why he would not do this.

He might, but he very well might not. At least he would listen to the arguments against before deciding.

Cruz Bustamental would not only sign it in a heartbeat, he would actively campaign to get it passed.

What McClintock would do is academic since he has no chance of being elected.

73 posted on 08/28/2003 1:15:29 PM PDT by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson