To: Beelzebubba
The so called "gun-show loophole" doesn't exist in CA. All transfers between private citizens (other than between husband and wife) must be done through a gun dealer with paperwork going to the state. The Brady bill is duplicated in state law too. Those horses have already left the barn, making Arnolds position academic.
9 posted on
08/27/2003 1:30:27 PM PDT by
Hugin
To: Hugin
Good point Hugin. Some also seem to think being pro-Brady Bill has meaning in California.
But the Brady Bill calls for a 5 day waiting period.
California's had a 15 day waiting period since 1976.
11 posted on
08/27/2003 1:35:06 PM PDT by
South40
(Get Right Or Get Left)
To: Hugin; All
The Brady bill is duplicated in state law too. Those horses have already left the barn, making Arnolds position academic. No, it demonstrates that Liberal Arnold has as much disdane for the Second Ammendment as other Liberals around the country.
Tom McClintock is opposed to Brady and other restrictions on the constitutional right to keep and bear arms.
With new gun grabbing laws being proposed in the California legislature on a daily basis, the distinction is an important one.
17 posted on
08/27/2003 1:51:09 PM PDT by
ElkGroveDan
(It's time for Arnold to stop splitting the Republican vote and step aside for the good of the party)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson