1 posted on
09/10/2003 6:41:46 PM PDT by
Brian S
To: Brian S
"The hour has come for President Bush and Congress to once and for all rid America's streets of these weapons of war." Metzenbaum is absolutely correct. The time has come to make our streets safe for the Republic.
We must outlaw those who would make war on the Republic. The time has come to gird our loins, strengthen our resolve to do what must be done - Outlaw The Democratic Party!
2 posted on
09/10/2003 6:54:28 PM PDT by
GladesGuru
(In a society predicated upon liberty, it is essential to examine principles - -)
To: Brian S
It ain't gonna happen. Bush needs the red zone states and polls say he's not gonna get the anti gun states anyway.
5 posted on
09/10/2003 7:43:01 PM PDT by
SSN558
(Be on the lookout for Black White-Supremacists)
To: Joe Brower
ping
6 posted on
09/10/2003 7:43:24 PM PDT by
FreedomPoster
(this space intentionally blank)
To: Brian S; Joe Brower
Contact: Naomi Seligman Phone: 202-628-7772 ext. 126 Well, well. Doesn't she work for the VPC? Consumer Federation of America, indeed.
7 posted on
09/10/2003 7:45:48 PM PDT by
Sender
To: Brian S
Howard Metzenbaum, Metzenjerk wanted a total ban.
8 posted on
09/10/2003 7:48:10 PM PDT by
Dan from Michigan
("Our party will never be the choice of the NRA" - John F. Kerry, who looks French)
To: Brian S
Uh no. Guns are only a threat if threats use them.
10 posted on
09/10/2003 7:50:13 PM PDT by
bluelowrider57
(More of da thugz crawlin)
To: Brian S
If Bush lets this small loudmouth minority ban more guns.. I will really consider staying home voting day.
11 posted on
09/10/2003 7:54:25 PM PDT by
Monty22
To: *bang_list
Metzenbaum a leading consumer advocate?
Whatever.
There has been a promise made by the GOP leaders of the House. It will be kept if any Republican ever wants my vote again. Sad to have to say that, but there's a huge constitutional issue here and the PARTY needs to lead on this and defend this and all of our rights or I'm done with the lot of them. To those who'd suggest I'd be throwing my vote away on third party candidates, there is either a dime's worth of difference or there is not, and if I vote for Republicans and they don't do Republican things in office, I already threw my vote away.
Dave in Eugene
13 posted on
09/10/2003 8:38:38 PM PDT by
Clinging Bitterly
(Keep forgetting to update this thing from thread-specific taglines. Am I the only one?)
To: Brian S
From the article: "Unless Congress and President Bush work together to enact new legislation, UZIs, AK 47s, and a list of other bargain basement military-style killing machines will flood America's streets again," said retired Senator and Consumer Federation of America (CFA) Chairman Howard Metzenbaum. "The existing law is so weak that scores of slightly modified versions of assault weapons banned ten years ago are legally and freely available."
Liberals have such weak minds that they don't even notice when they contradict themselves within the same short paragraph.
So, which is it? The law is so weak that "assault weapons" are "legally and freely available"?
Or, if the law is not renewed then "bargain basement military-style killing machines will flood America's streets again"?
Democrats are unable to decide whether the present law is a "success" because there never was a problem.
To: AAABEST; wku man; SLB; Travis McGee; Squantos; harpseal; Shooter 2.5; The Old Hoosier; xrp; ...
16 posted on
09/11/2003 5:34:08 AM PDT by
Joe Brower
("History teaches us that man learns nothing from history." -- George Hegel)
To: Brian S; Joe Brower; Travis McGee
"Unless Congress and President Bush work together to enact new legislation, UZIs, AK 47s, and a list of other bargain basement military-style killing machines will flood America's streets again," said retired Senator and Consumer Federation of America (CFA) Chairman Howard Metzenbaum. "The existing law is so weak that scores of slightly modified versions of assault weapons banned ten years ago are legally and freely available." Refresh my memory: How many times over the last 100 years have "assult weapons" been used in the commission of violent crimes in the United States? Now, how many times have baseball bats been used in a similar role? Anyone want to bet which tool is more commonly used for mayhem?
29 posted on
09/11/2003 6:13:05 AM PDT by
King Prout
(people hear and do not listen, see and do not observe, speak without thought, post and not edit)
To: Brian S
If President Bush renews the "Assault Weapons Ban" I will not vote for him in the next election. I can barely stomach the expanded programs that have been put in place under his watch as it is. This, I will consider to be the last straw.
32 posted on
09/11/2003 6:17:05 AM PDT by
AD from SpringBay
(We have the government we allow and deserve.)
To: Brian S
What a pack of lies!Since when has Howard Metzenbaum been a "Consumer Advocate" Metzenbaum was the leading Senate anti-gun Nazi for decades until he retired and upChuckie Schemer (D, of course, NY, of course) took over that role
And our good friend Naomi Seligman (who used to be Naomi Piss - main mouthpiece for Sara Brady) been a consumer advocate? Seligman is a gun hating, freedom hating, jackboot worshiping neo-Nazi just like Brady.
This is just one more lie on top of the millions already told by the anti-gunners. They don't rely on truth to try and force their religion down our throats because the truth has nothing to do with what they believe - "consumer federation" my a$$
34 posted on
09/11/2003 6:22:05 AM PDT by
from occupied ga
(Your government is your most dangerous enemy, and Bush is no conservative)
To: Brian S
Sonia Wills, mother of bus driver Conrad Johnson, the last victim of the Washington, DC-area sniper attacks OK... Y'all have to admit that she's got a point. Her son would be alive today if only we had a law against felons stealing firearms.
73 posted on
09/11/2003 8:12:32 AM PDT by
Redcloak
(All work and no FReep makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no FReep make s Jack a dul boy. Allwork an)
To: Brian S
Its time for the Second Amendment people to hold Bush's feet to the fire too.
He said he supported EXISTING gun laws. This law EXPIRES on Sept. 13th and is no longer existing. ERGO, he should NOT support.
When you write Bush, make sure you cc his later ego, that idiot Carl Rove, who apparently feels a gun in your hand is less dangerous than several million illegal aliens sneaking across the Mexican border.
Both Lautenberg and McCarthy are lunatics on the gun issue.
Lautenberg is on record as opposing the Second Amendment and supporting total disarmament of the public. McCarthy is a one-issue airhead who sneaked into office and I doubt if she ever even read the Constitution.
76 posted on
09/11/2003 8:21:10 AM PDT by
ZULU
To: Brian S
Its time for the Second Amendment people to hold Bush's feet to the fire too.
He said he supported EXISTING gun laws. This law EXPIRES on Sept. 13th and is no longer EXISTING. ERGO, he should NOT support its extension.
When you write Bush, make sure you cc his alter ego, that idiot Carl Rove, who apparently feels a gun in your hand is more dangerous than several million illegal aliens sneaking across the Mexican border.
Both Lautenberg and McCarthy are lunatics on the gun issue.
Lautenberg is on record as opposing the Second Amendment and supporting total disarmament of the public. McCarthy is a one-issue airhead who sneaked into office and I doubt if she ever even read the Constitution
80 posted on
09/11/2003 8:33:59 AM PDT by
ZULU
To: Brian S
said retired Senator and Consumer Federation of America (CFA) Chairman Howard Metzenbaum Does this have any affiliation with Consumer Reports?
92 posted on
09/11/2003 10:20:43 AM PDT by
Hacksaw
(Toomey '04)
"The American people will not take kindly to a Congress and President who buckle under to the extreme demands of the gun lobby by letting the law expire or simply reenacting the existing weak ban," said Metzenbaum.
Mr. Metzenbaum, this is why you are not the president's Chief of Staff. If so, Bush would be lucky to make it through his FIRST term, let alone get reelected for a second.
To: Brian S
I'm really disappointed to not see "wholesale slaughter", "choice of criminals", "streets running with blood" etc.
Will I ever be happy?
124 posted on
09/15/2003 9:51:19 AM PDT by
Blue Collar Christian
(It's none of your business whether or not I need my guns and ammo.><>)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson