Posted on 09/25/2003 6:35:11 AM PDT by Theodore R.
Free and Independent
September 11, 2003 A recent biography of Thomas Jefferson contains an amusing statement. It says that Jefferson’s arguments in the 1798 Kentucky Resolutions “brought him dangerously close to secessionism.”
Apparently the biographer doesn’t realize that Jefferson was an explicit secessionist. For openers, he wrote a famous secessionist document known to posterity as the Declaration of Independence.
The Declaration proclaims the 13 American colonies “Free and Independent States” — adding “that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do.”
Note the plural. Jefferson weighed his words with utmost care, and he didn’t speak of these states as a single thing — certainly not as the single, monolithic “new nation” Lincoln later called them. Each state was independent not only of Britain, but of the other states as well. They were united only in “alliance.”
The Articles of Confederation would soon repeat the point: “Each State retains its sovereignty, freedom, and independence.” The 1783 Treaty of Paris, concluding peace with Britain, spoke of the “free, sovereign, and independent states,” listing them all by name. The Constitution always refers to the United States in the plural and never refers to them as a “nation.”
When the Constitution was presented for ratification, the Union was briefly dissolved. It was reunited as the states ratified the Constitution. Any state that declined to ratify it would have remained outside the Union, but in the end all rejoined. Even so, three states ratified on the express condition that they reserved the right to “resume” or “reassume” the powers they had delegated to the Union — that is, to withdraw from the Union. The right to secede, or “separate,” was taken for granted.
In the Kentucky Resolutions, which every thoughtful American should study carefully, Jefferson reminded his countrymen that the nature of the Union was that of a voluntary confederation of those free and independent states. It was not a capitulation to a new sovereign power. The powers of the Federal Government were limited, specific, and delegated; and if it exceeded them the states must have some recourse.
The Resolutions were written in protest against the Alien and Sedition Acts, which Jefferson saw as unconstitutional. It’s now generally agreed that he was right. He stressed that if the Federal Government were to be the final and exclusive authority on what the Constitution meant, it would be free to define the extent of its own powers — which would defeat the whole purpose of a written constitution.
On this occasion Jefferson didn’t call for secession, but later secessionists would draw on his powerful arguments. He treasured the Union, but he abhorred the idea that the states could or should be kept in the Union by force. They were still, in principle, “Free and Independent States.” They could remain free and independent only if they remained sovereign.
In 1816 Jefferson would write that “if any state in the Union will declare that it prefers separation ... to a continuance in union ... I have no hesitation in saying, ‘Let us separate.’” He hoped it would never come to that, but he saw that the ultimate right to withdraw from the Union was essential to the Union’s free and voluntary character.
Though he regarded slavery as a great wrong that would have to be corrected, Jefferson would certainly have agreed that the Southern states had the right to secede in 1860. His grandson George Wythe Randolph served the Confederacy as a general in the army and as secretary of war.
In the early nineteenth century there had been many separation movements, most of them in New England, and the right to secede was generally unchallenged. The first president to deny a state’s right to leave the Union was Andrew Jackson, who threatened to keep South Carolina in the Union by force if necessary. The idea of invading a state shocked even strong Unionists like Daniel Webster. But Abraham Lincoln would adopt Jackson’s views in his first inaugural address, and he acted on them ruthlessly.
The curious thing is that both Jackson and Lincoln claimed devotion to Jefferson’s principles, as nearly everyone did in those days. But they ignored the part about “Free and Independent States.” Today it would be absurd to describe the states as independent — or free.
Joseph Sobran
Perhaps if one can stop the deification of this war criminal, then perhaps we could overturn some of his actions that destroyed the Republic
I like Sobrane for the history in his articles. I'd never heard this before, for instance. People from Texas always say that "Texas is the only state that put the right to leave the Union in their Constitution (or maybe it's the ratificaiton bill?) and the only state that was an independent (western-style) nation prior to joining. The latter is an overstatement, as Joe points out for a brief period each of the 13 originals were independent. I believe there also was a California Republic, though it only lasted for year and had limited acceptance by the rest of the world. I'm not sure the Texas Republic did much better.
free dixie,sw
On the contrary. Sobran makes a compelling argument. Instead of just calling it "stupid" why don't you challenge his points with considered refutations - properly sourced of course.
Not up to the task? Then shut the hell up.
I figured as much...
You can't make a case against Sobran's article because it is too solid. Instead you just call it names. Are you going to put your thumbs in your ears, wiggle your fingers, and give it rasberries too?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.