1 posted on
12/04/2003 8:54:42 AM PST by
ahadams2
To: ahadams2; Eala; Grampa Dave; AnAmericanMother; sweetliberty; N. Theknow; Ray'sBeth; ...
Ping.
2 posted on
12/04/2003 8:55:53 AM PST by
ahadams2
(Anglican Freeper Resource Page: http://eala.freeservers.com/anglican/)
To: ahadams2
OK, let's se..the ECUSA breaks up..we have a long and protracted legal battle to hold onto our property and treasure, so we join the RCs and get to fund the settlements for the pervert priests? Not me...
4 posted on
12/04/2003 9:01:43 AM PST by
ken5050
To: ahadams2
OK, let's see..the ECUSA breaks up..we have a long and protracted legal battle to hold onto our property and treasure, so we join the RCs and get to fund the settlements for the pervert priests? Not me...
5 posted on
12/04/2003 9:01:47 AM PST by
ken5050
To: ahadams2
Bumping this to read later!
7 posted on
12/04/2003 9:20:52 AM PST by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: ahadams2
FiF may be able to establish an inter-Communion settlement of some sort, but I don't see them joining Rome. Rome's Mariology, Purgatory, papal infallibility, clerical celibacy, etc are at least inconsistent with traditional Anglicanism.
25 posted on
12/04/2003 10:04:29 AM PST by
bobjam
To: ahadams2
As a Catholic and a convert myself, I'd just like to say to those considering such a thing, WELCOME. We aren't without our problems but the doctrine and the theology and especially the hope in Christ are correct.
45 posted on
12/04/2003 1:44:47 PM PST by
tiki
To: ahadams2
He seems to be pushing for one, but there alreasy is an Anglican-use liturgy. I'm pretty sure the only distinction between that and a full-blown "Anglican Rite" is that there is no Anglican patriarch. Seeing how the patriarchates are based on the apostles, I'm not sure there could be one. Unless Joseph of Arimathea gets a promotion. (Little King Arthur dig.)
61 posted on
12/05/2003 11:18:59 AM PST by
dangus
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson