No, the article states what true Christianity is like, how it originated, and how it has survived all the attacks upon it: nothing more, nothing less, and nothing else.
no, your response about ‘the fallicies’ of rome, is the typical anti catholic b.s. that is still bandied about as if it has any merit...nothing more , nothing less, and nothing else....
Some people will see everything as *anti-Catholicism* if what is presented is the truth and not favorable to Catholicism.
Kind of like the race card these days.
The truth about Catholicism is the truth about it.
If it doesn’t make Catholicism look good, it’s not the fault of the messenger. The RCC itself is the one to blame.
It’s THEIR history.
But instead of admitting, yes, our church did some stuff a long time ago that wasn’t right, and having some credibility and integrity in that admission, we have the see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil monkeys who turn everything into *anti-Catholic*.
I guess then, the only ones who are not anti-Catholics would be the ones who would lie about Catholicism’s history.
Interesting, that.