Posted on 09/02/2018 3:21:38 AM PDT by Repent and Believe
The Latest on the Viganò Letter Drama…
Developments & Reactions
[New developments being added as we become aware of them]
This post continues our coverage of the ongoing ecclesiastical Chernobyl unleashed by the accusations of the former Vatican nuncio to the United States, “Abp.” Carlo Viganò, which were first published on Aug. 25 and have the potential not only to bring an end to the Francis “pontificate” but even to throw the entire Vatican II Sect into unprecedented chaos:
Saturday, Sep. 1, 2018
“Abp.” Carlo Viganò releases new letter revealing ‘what really happened’ when Francis met privately with Kim Davis during his 2015 visit to the United States FULL DOCUMENT TEXT HERE
Francis’ mouthpiece “Fr.” Antonio Spadaro, S.J., says in tweet that Vigano’s testimony about the Kim Davis meeting “doesn’t make sense at all”
Gianluigi Nuzzi, the journalist behind the two “Vatileaks” affairs, says that “Abp.” Vigano is credible
Ed Pentin reports on Viganò’s responses to videos appearing to show inconsistencies with his testimony Reactions from Select Blogs and Web Sites
Vaticanist Andrea Tornielli comments on “Abp.” Vigano’s Aug. 31 interview with LifeSiteNews
Trying to determine whether the Vigano Letter’s accusations correspond to the truth, The New York Times notes that both Francis and Benedict XVI “could clear up the confusion created by the letter. Neither one has.”
To explain Francis’ behavior, a blogger reminds his readers of Francis’ Peronist modus operandi first exposed in Omar Bello’s book El Verdadero Francisco (“The True Francis”)
“Fr.” Dwight Longenecker suspects that if Francis continues his “sad silence” in face of these grave allegations, “we may see the development of a lame duck papacy”
Dr. Joseph Shaw opines that the enablers of abuse are as much of a problem as the abusers themselves Chris Ferrara responds to the “neo-Catholic polemic” addressing the Vigano accusations
Tom Droleskey on ‘Another Front in the Conciliar War’, Part 4
Prof. Francis Beckwith points out that “if the media make the request to examine the documents and memos cited in Archbishop Viganò’s testimony, the Holy Father cannot refuse without undermining his credibility and by default his papacy”
Related Stories
Crux‘s Inés San Martín provides a handy overview: ‘Who’s who in drama of cover-up accusation against Pope Francis?’
“Fr.” Michael Holleran of the Archdiocese of New York draws perverted analogy to say sodomites are spiritually “more receptive”
Prior Days’ Coverage
Days 1-3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6 Day 7
Let’s see if Francis will face some jeers at the Angelus window tomorrow…
He adhered to the Scriptures in defiance of a corrupt Rome, that did not even want to listen to Scripture at his trial.He did not proclaim his own religion. That is false. He proclaimed Christ and the truth of Scripture.
He did not move away from the teachings of Christ. That is false.
He embraced them and taught them. He translated the Scriptures into the common language so that the average person could read the Scriptures on their own.
He led no one astray. He led them to Christ and to the Gospel of Grace. Thank God!
Since Rome was corrupt, God continued His work by circumventing the corruption.
Rome is still corrupt today.
The perversion is just one form of corruption.
6 There was a man sent from God whose name was John. 7 He came as a witness to testify concerning that light, so that through him all might believe.
Actually, it is mere like what accusation was not raised against him, mostly falsely, including adultery?
“Well; THIS Prot will GLADLY stand aside and let you poor Catholics have it out with each other if you wish! “
Well I’m not Catholic.
Just get tired of seeing the venomous rhetoric from both sides so often.
Do people really think Christ would give them a high five for the things they are posting?
+1
Yes; on BOTH sides of the aisle.
However; both cannot be right!
The reason prelates’ titles are in quotes is because the actual authority to bestow the order was absent or is at least highly questionable in light of the invalidity of those ordaining and conferring as well as deficiency of the altered matter or form.
The invalidity of the “conferrer” is on account of apostacy with supporting the blatant Modernism of “Vatican II”, for example, a heresy condemned by the very Pope whose feast we celebrate this very day, Saint Pius X!
(All the priests at the “Vatican II” had taken the oath against Modernism prior to their ordination, yet in approving the council did they also remain faithful to that solemn vow?
Dear Saint Pope Pius X, ora pro nobis!
Seems to be a rift in the monolithic façade of Catholicism.
You missed it.
VII was the façade.
“We follow Christ and not sinful men.“
Jesus would go through the Vatican in such a way as to make his visit to the Money Changers look like a Sunday school picnic.
I doubt He would leave a single stone standing.
L
A rift? I’m thinking Grand Canyon size rift.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.