Posted on 10/13/2018 3:42:33 PM PDT by ebb tide
If not conservative, then traditional is much better. Avoids the Eastern connections that the word “Orthodox” brings.
How far back does your magisterium go back? Just to 1958?
FYI, as of today, every deceased post-conciliar pope, except for John Paul I (who only held office for 33 days), has been canonized.
The last pre-conciliar pope to have been canonized was Pope St. Pius X who died in 1914 and was not canonized until 1954, by the last pre-conciliar pope to have lived.
No post-concilar pope has canonized any of their pre-concilar predecessors; they only canonized each other. What does that tell you about the "hermeneutic of continuity"?
It's all an attempt to justify the Second Vatican Council.
SAINT Paul VI: Pope to Canonize Revolution of Vatican II
REMINDER: The Case for Pacelli
'I am the devil' next to John Paul, jokes Pope Francis
Do you guys think Bergoglio the Jokester's canonizations are infallible?
if Francis is a true pope.
The same was true of JPII's canonization and John XXIII's canonization.
Agree 100% with this.
Good posts. If canonizations by true popes can be questioned, then we make a mockery of the Communion of Saints.
You have a political candidate, he’s pro-life, that is the primary issue with me, not that I’m a single-issue voter but that is the main issue.
Pope Francis has been making pro-life statements lately, he’s made them throughout his Papacy. That means a lot.
Lots of detail, I know.
I agree about the confusion, but orthodox Roman Catholic is accurate.
Neither Popes or Saints are, or need be, impeccable.
Our Magisterium goes all the way back to Christ in teachings on Faith and Morals which are developed, but never contradicted and which are taught by the Bishops through out the world and by the Popes. Also, rarely by the Pope “from the Chair”.
Then how does frogjerk (post #9) justify his quote of St. Thomas Aquinas?
(Quod 9, q. 16, contra 1) In the church there is not able to be a damnable error. But it would be a damnable error if she would venerate a saint who was a sinner, because anyone knowing their sin, might believe the church to be false; and if this were to happen, they might be led into error. Therefore the church is not able to err in such things.
The post-concilar popes, especially Pope Francis, have contradicted the Church Magisterium in many ways.
There is no continuity with the pre-concilar popes or Church.
That's one of many of VC II's innovations. Morality has now developed to adultery is acceptable to receive Holy Communion, i.e., the Sixth Commandment is no longer valid. Faith has developed to where now there is salvation outside of the Catholic Church.
So much for "continuity" and "no contradictions" with the Church Magisterium.
Agree, and agree.
Neither does Francis need to be, according to Thomas Rosica, who hasn't been corrected by his boss:
Our Church has indeed entered a new phase, Rosica wrote. With the advent of this first Jesuit pope, it is openly ruled by an individual rather than by the authority of Scripture alone or even its own dictates of tradition plus Scripture.
Nonsense: Cardinal Burke rebukes Fr. Rosica for saying Francis is above Scripture
So it's discontinuity with the Church Magisterium, also?
Will you admit that?
For myself, I stick with Roman Catholic, Christian Roman Catholic, or just plain Catholic, period.
Lol. At least obedient Catholic it sounds like.
Ijust worry about Catholics who set themselves up, right or left, against the authenticity of the Magisterium.
Blessings.
Then you should start worrying about Jorge Bergoglio and his "gods of surprises".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.