Posted on 06/14/2019 4:51:14 PM PDT by ebb tide
Who needs to obey canon law while Francis is pope?
I think it would be counterproductive to impose sanctions, simply because they dont change anybodys minds.
_____________________________________________________
He’s right. Sanctions have never, ever, ever -in human history - changed anyone’s mind. /s
And the fish rots from the head
Ping
Dancing on the TRAPDOORS of HELL!
So the church is cool with marrying adulterers?
Seems it would also be counterproductive to die on a cross in ancient Palestine, because it didn’t change anybody’s mind. Much better to come down from the cross, and show them that you’re the Messiah. Then, people’s minds would surely be changed. /s
It's only cool with Pope Francis; it's not cool with the Catholic Church.
That is why you have the anullment process.
Bergoglio’s new annulment process is a joke; it’s nothing more than “catholic” divorce.
Well get use to it. It is here.
Bergoglio can't have too many "annulments". And if one is too lazy to bother with one, he/she can go ahead and remarry civilly. He'll still allow you to sacrilegiously receive Holy Communion thus committing a mortal sin in addition to that of adultery.
It may be here, for now. But it doesn’t be the “annulments” are valid.
“be” = “mean”
It is important to deny these politicians, precisely because they hope to use their affiliation with Catholicism to get elected.
The issue is *not* to persuade Moloch worshipers to stop sacrificing children, but to persuade Catholics that support these politicians, perhaps because they are ‘Catholics’, to *stop* supporting them. Don’t vote for them, and tell your friends not to vote for them either.
Canon 915:The Apostolic Signatura already clarified --- years ago, in fact--- that "are not to be" means "MUST NOT BE" and that this is binding on the person distributing Holy Communion.Those who have been excommunicated or interdicted after the imposition or declaration of the penalty and others obstinately persevering in manifest grave sin are not to be admitted to holy communion.
But these bishops and cardinals think they are above the law.
Turning an offender away from Communion is not just to be a "persuasive" gesture. It's to prevent Eucharistic Sacrilege, because
If Cupich had one iota of love for God, for the sinner, for his own priests or his own flock, he would firmly enforce 915. But he either has no love in him, or he just does not give a damn.
McCarrick not only hid the memo, however he lied about it.
And it is now known, that Mr. McCarrick easily solicited Pope Francis to elevate Cupcake Cupich to where he is today.
Cupich is the worse excuse for a bishop in the United States. He ignores the CCC at will to appease his democrat donors. If B16 were still pope there is no way in the world this charlatan would have ever became an archbishop. He was made an archbishop on the recommendation of his old friend, the notorious homosexual predator McCarrick.
McCarrick, Gregory, Nighty-night Tobin, Wuerl, Cupich are all as queer as a 3 dollar bill. Bergoglio knows it and could care less. So is the creep
Monsignor Rossi, who as Rector the whole world gets to see every time theres a Mass at the Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception.
https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/the-washington-d.c.-catholic-gay-mafia
I think he gives a damn about remaking Christ's Church in the Cardinal's image, he knows EXACTLY what he's doing, is wanting in love, and is perhaps part of that smoke Pope Paul VI mentioned.
When the radicals in the 1960s, punks in the 1970s, new wavers in the 1980s, and grungers in the 1990s came along, you could spot them from a mile away. The radicals in the 21st century look like the establishment...because they ARE the establishment.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.