Then why do you prattle on about your Saint Pachamama?
Posted on 02/16/2020 11:25:04 AM PST by ebb tide
Hate to to tell you, but your prayers to your and your pope's Pachamama are not heard.
I don’t see the problem with married priests.
Pope Benedict sees a problem.
“ Hate to to tell you, but your prayers to your and your pope’s Pachamama are not heard.”
I only pray to God.
Then why do you prattle on about your Saint Pachamama?
“ Then why do you prattle on about your Saint Pachamama?”
The latest catholic saint.
Don’t worry! We’re just generating her!
You're generating something, alright. And it stinks to high heaven.
Venerating
odds are there will be more married priest and women priests. It will happen incrementally and every one here will be dead from old age.
The church is different than 1900 years ago, 1000 years ago; and than in 1950 and in 2100 it will be different in other ways.
But the basic canon will remain the same, everything else is outside the core.
If you want to venerate pagan idols like Pachamama, go for it. But don’t claim to be a practicing catholic.
More like a practicing pagan.
I don’t know about your Mass, but the Mass I attend is not much different than the Mass my great grandparents attended.
As far as basic canons, four new ones were created with VC II and now there are even more.
So your great grands attended mass in the local language and received communion in hand.
Nope. Neither do I.
Next question?
Regardless of the language used in the mass you attend, you fail to a knowledge that things change in the catholic church over centuries and the odds are they will change again. That was my original point.
Name me one woman catholic priest in the history of the Catholic Church.
who said anything about history I said in the future Your need to fight supersedes your reading comprehension. You can’t negate my point because no one can predict the future. But based on the past, the church will change over time. Is that what you really disagree with. It’s all i’m saying.
You did, in your post #29: "The church is different than 1900 years ago, 1000 years ago; and than in 1950," in your defense of womyn "priests".
it was context to show the church would change in the future. I said nothing about what those changes were.
You persists in a lack of comprehension as to what I am saying or you just refuse to address my actual point. We’re done.
Sure you did.
In you post #29, you stated, "odds are there will be more married priest and women priests."
I'm beginning to question your short-term memory.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.