Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/17/2020 11:47:35 AM PDT by ebb tide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Al Hitan; Coleus; DuncanWaring; Fedora; irishjuggler; Jaded; JoeFromSidney; kalee; markomalley; ...

Ping


2 posted on 06/17/2020 11:48:18 AM PDT by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ebb tide

STOP THIS APOSTASY!!! NOW!!!


3 posted on 06/17/2020 11:54:25 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ebb tide

Thomas Schüller is wrong. Christ had only men as apostles to follow him in his ministry.


4 posted on 06/17/2020 11:55:46 AM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ebb tide

Be careful what you wish for, buddy. Women and Fags destroyed the Boy Scouts of America.


6 posted on 06/17/2020 12:36:44 PM PDT by sciencewriter86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ebb tide

Let’s go back to the Book of Genesis. Eve is tricked by Satan and eats of the forbidden fruit from the Tree of Knowledge. She then goes on to convince Adam to eat of the same forbidden fruit. Old story, but here is my OPINION on this.

A thing (the fruit of the tree of knowledge) cannot change it’s nature. The Bible states that when Adam ate of the fruit their (both Adam and Eve) eyes were opened. Strange. How is it that the fruit had an almost immediate effect on Adam but Eve was able to eat of it, go find Adam, convince him to share in the fruit and then her eyes were opened. I don’t buy it, not logical for it would mean the nature of the fruit is variable.

Again, in my opinion, Eve ate of the fruit, suffered it effects, i.e. gained the knowledge of good and evil and THEN convinced Adam to eat of it knowing of the consequences. I believe this to be a reason (unpublished and unspoken) why women are not allowed to be priests.

Nothing against women, it’s just a case of natural strengths. Women are better than men at looking at circumstances and finding justifications for bending the rules. Men are better at following the rules as written. There is a place for both in this world and we are better off for having both strengths. But God’s Word is true and unchanging. Searching for circumstances to allow bending of the rules is not helpful.

Again, just my opinion. I’ll get off my soapbox now and make myself a new tinfoil hat.


7 posted on 06/17/2020 12:59:26 PM PDT by Sergio (An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ebb tide

If you ordain females you will be putting lesbeens in charge. If you have lesbeen priests, you will have lesbeen bishops and cardinals, and one day a lesbeen pope.


9 posted on 06/17/2020 1:17:46 PM PDT by I want the USA back (Never forget Justine Damond, murdered by a NON-WHITE, NON-CHRISTIAN cop. (Oh, and no riots))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson