How about the archives that include the facts that people lived and grew crops in Iceland? Or is that too subjective?
Well-calibrated??? How do you calibrate tree ring data which tells you more about the length of the growing season than the tempreture?
However, recent modeling studies show that increased solar irradiance does not warm Earth's surface at all locations, the research team wrote.
The is just great scientific work. Use your computer models to prove your theory. Of course your models assume your theory is correct. Computers just tell you what you told them to tell you, which isn't proof of anything.
Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from this list.
I don't get offended if you want to be removed.
Temperature appears to cycle every 100,000 years.
link to graph = http://cdiac.esd.ornl.gov/trends/temp/vostok/jouz_tem.htm
***********************************************************
***********************************************************2. Hockeystick demolished
Corrections to the Mann et. al. (1998) Proxy Data Base and Northern Hemispheric Average Temperature Series.
McIntyre, Steven and Ross McKitrick,. Energy & Environment Vol. 14, No 6, pp. 751-771, October 26, 2003Freely downloadable from < <http://www.multi-science.co.uk/mcintyre_02.pdf>
See also www.climate2003.com/index.html and www.climate2003.com/audit.html
ABSTRACTThe data set of proxies of past climate used in Mann, Bradley and Hughes (1998, "MBH98" hereafter) for the estimation of temperatures from 1400 to 1980 contains collation errors, unjustifiable truncation or extrapolation of source data, obsolete data, geographical location errors, incorrect calculation of principal components and other quality control defects. We detail these errors and defects. We then apply MBH98 methodology to the construction of a Northern Hemisphere average temperature index for the 1400-1980 period, using corrected and updated source data.
The major finding is that the values in the early 15th century exceed any values in the 20th century. The particular "hockey stick" shape derived in the MBH98 proxy construction - a temperature index that decreases slightly between the early 15th century and early 20th century and then increases dramatically up to 1980 - is primarily an artifact of poor data handling, obsolete data and incorrect calculation of principal components.
--------------------------------------
Comment by David Wojick: We all suspected that the Mann et al hockey stick was hiding the Medieval Warm Period and Little Ice Age. Now these two Canadians have proven it. It may have been warmer just 500 years ago. A fine piece of work.Comment by Fred Singer on the initial response by Mann, Bradley, Hughes to McIntyre, McKitrick:
First, it is entirely appropriate for MBH to express their views about MM. They do so without invective or rancor, and without ad hominem attacks on MM, the journal and its editor , etc. In that sense, it is in the best scientific tradition.
Having said this, I notice that MBH do not reply to the specific criticisms discussed by MM regarding the data quality in the MBH data-set (as listed in MM's Audit Issues) but instead develop criticisms of their own against the reconstruction of MM.
The response of MBH also seems to indicate that their conclusions are highly sensitive to subtle points in "principal-component" analysis of tree rings. In itself, elucidation of this sensitivity will be an interesting result of this discussion.
I think we should hear what MM have to say before we jump to any conclusions. Even if MBH are successful in their critique of the MM reconstruction, but do not at the same time respond to the data-integrity issues, we may be left with the situation where both parties are wrong.
Accordingly, the first concern should be to resolve the data problems: let's get an agreed data-set representing the most up-to-date versions of the proxies used by MBH: no truncations, no obsolete data, etc.
It would also be helpful in resolving this controversy if there was full disclosure by MBH of their procedures in far more detail than done in MBH98. Until that is done, it is very difficult to express further opinions on any of the technical aspects of the analyses by MM and MBH.
After taking these steps, if the parties can resolve their differences in some way -- fine. If, as I suspect, they cannot, then one needs an independent body of experts in the analysis of time series, possibly economists and statisticians, who are uninvolved with climate issues.
I will therefore express no further opinion on any of the technical aspects of the analyses by MM and MBH.
***********************************************************
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on or off the
Gods, Graves, Glyphs PING list or GGG weekly digest
-- Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)
The Little Ice Age:
How Climate Made History 1300-1850
by Brian M. Fagan
Paperback
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · | ||
|
|||
Gods |
Just updating the GGG info, not sending a general distribution. |
||
· Discover · Nat Geographic · Texas AM Anthro News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · Google · · The Archaeology Channel · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists · |