Posted on 06/27/2004 4:52:11 AM PDT by neutrino
Jolted workers rethink life's basics
09:54 AM CDT on Saturday, June 26, 2004
Mark Olesen and Jerry Dugick live 181 miles apart. They're strangers to each other, but they share a common bond. Losing their tech jobs to overseas workers cost each of them more than paychecks and pride. For Mark, a former software engineer for IBM in Austin, it led to bankruptcy and nearly a year away from his family, driving big rigs to natural gas fields around the country. Jerry, a former engineer and project manager for Cadence Design Systems, sold the Dallas home he treasured to eliminate debt. He can pay for his daughter's first two years of college. But he doesn't see a way to cover the rest of her tuition with a part-time job. The upheaval in both their lives illustrates why moving U.S. white-collar jobs overseas has caused so much anxiety and controversy. In many cases, the disruptions go far beyond lost income. The irony: Offshoring has been a boon to American businesses, consumers and Third World workers boosting profits, cutting prices and increasing incomes. "We are kind of a victim of our own success," says Dane Anderson, program director of outsourcing and service providers for META Group, an information technology research and consulting firm. White-collar workers affected by offshoring usually land other jobs. But for the first time in their lives, many are struggling to adapt to a lower standard of living. And the emotional toll can be just as burdensome. Most worked hard to get a good education only to discover what plenty of former manufacturing employees already know: Workers overseas can do their jobs for less money."There is no job that is America's God-given right anymore," Carly Fiorina, chief executive of Hewlett-Packard Co., declared earlier this year. "We have to compete for jobs."
Humbling experience
Offshoring has come full circle for Mark, a 37-year-old with curly brown hair and a wide grin. Three years ago, his job was moved overseas. Now he spends his nights at his north Austin home collaborating with a group of programmers in Israel. The group is updating software used to help companies and entrepreneurs figure out whether their products will sell on eBay. The programmers perform the work, and Mark sends them sales data. The job pays $36,000, about half of what he earned at IBM. He and his family lack health insurance. And with Israel eight hours ahead, he stays up most of the night. During the day, he talks to his boss in Utah and other folks. But the software engineer isn't grumbling. He's relieved to be employed in the tech field again, especially since the small firm from Provo, Utah, that hired him is owned by one of his college buddies. A year ago, Mark rarely saw his wife and the two teenage girls he helped raise. He spent his days at natural gas fields in Colorado, Michigan and other states, setting up and moving pumps and other heavy equipment. His nights were spent sleeping in strange hotels. Most of the men he worked with hadn't gone to college. And the pay: $10 an hour plus overtime. It was the best he could do. When Mark lost his job in the midst of the tech slump, he couldn't find anything that would allow him to use his computer science degree from Brigham Young University. Employers were interested in hiring only foreign workers on H-1B visas. The months dragged on. One of his cars was repossessed. On the brink of losing his house and unable to hold off his creditors any longer, he filed for bankruptcy.
Moving on
The move allowed him to reorganize his finances and clear away enough debt to save his house. But it also frightened him, leading him to sign up for the oil services contracting job. "It was a humbling experience," says the Star Trek fan who grew up in Long Island, N.Y. "You start to really realize how fragile life is." It's the last thing Mark expected to happen when he decided to study computer science. "I wanted to go for a career that provided me with some security," he recalls. One day while out on the road, Mark received a call from one of his college pals, asking whether he'd be interested in a job. In October, he began working from home. Today, Mark is paying off medical bills for his family and struggling to make his property tax payments. He hasn't bought a pair of shoes for himself in more than a year. And like many other laid-off tech workers, he has lost his respect for corporate America. "It's really hurting the American people," he says of offshoring. "They are strip-mining society." But the turmoil in his life has yielded an unexpected benefit: a newfound appreciation for what he does have. His family has learned how to have fun the low-cost way with barbecues and visits to state parks. "I don't think I take things for granted anymore," he says. "Life beats you down. You can either stay down or get back up and try to live."
Absorbing the shock
For Jerry, offshoring has been more of a one-way street heading south. For seven years, he was proud to work for Cadence Design Systems, a company in San Jose, Calif., that sells software used to design microchips, printed circuit boards and other items. A trim man with alert blue eyes and closely cropped hair, Jerry spent most of his time interacting with Cadence's customers. He taught them how to use the software and listened to their concerns. Most recently, he was in charge of making sure chipmaker Intel Corp., one of Cadence's biggest customers, received top-notch technical support. The questions he encountered often proved so complex that he needed a team of engineers to find the answers. The work was rarely dull. He never lacked for something to do. And he earned more than $100,000 a year. One day last August, after dropping off his daughter at the University of Arizona for her first year of college, Jerry returned to North Dallas to find an e-mail from his manager. Would he be at work the next day? The next morning he was told his job was moving to Noida, India. Cadence could hire three or four engineers for what they were paying him, Jerry learned. Until that point, Jerry hadn't thought much about offshoring. He knew Cadence wanted to staff a technical support center in India and had started eliminating jobs in the United States. But the University of Missouri electrical engineering graduate never thought one of those jobs might be his. "I had never been fired or laid off in my life," said the 43-year-old from St. Louis. "This kind of shocked me." He felt like he'd been pushed from a train. Once he got over the initial shock, Jerry started looking for another tech position. He quickly realized just how many people with master's degrees couldn't find work. His wife had just received her MBA and was also searching for a job. To prepare for the worst, the couple decided to sell their house in North Dallas, where they had lived for the last seven years. It sold the day they put it up for sale, at the asking price. The couple rented another house nearby so that their 14-year-old son wouldn't have to switch schools. With the money, they paid off debts and made some investments. Jerry got a few interviews, but nothing came of them. The one offer he got required him to travel more than 80 percent of the time. He turned it down. "My job is not worth my life," he says. In the meantime, he took some classes at the University of Texas at Dallas, passed an exam and got certified in project management.
New priorities
Without a job, Jerry started to take stock of his life. He realized that he had been working for his family and his company but not himself. If he had died the next day, he says, his tombstone would have read, "He was a good employee." Jerry began volunteering and networking with others who'd lost their jobs. He vows to make the next 20 years of his life more fulfilling. "I am not going to become a slave to some corporation," he says, still stinging from the memory of how he sang Cadence's praises before it dropped him. A few months ago, he walked into the office of a small engineering firm in Dallas. It was the first time he'd dared to drop into an office to leave his résumé and cover letter. He knew the owner from his days at Cadence. What do I have to lose? he asked himself. Today, Jerry is working part-time as a project manager for Circuitpac Corp. in Dallas, earning about a third of his former salary. He and his wife, who speaks fluent Spanish, hope to start their own business, selling computers to Hispanics. "I feel more stress than I used to," he says. "I'm still trying to figure out where Jerry is going to be a year from now." |
Wonder if he bought any IBM stock while employed with them.
You may as well - HP is outsourcing with a vengence, as I recall.
There's another point too - Carley the CEO got over $3.4 million dollars in compensation last year. I don't think she's worth it. The shareholders - the actual owners of the company - are being robbed by such as she.
If cutting costs is required, let us outsource the CEOs and reward the owners of the company. If cutting costs isn't that important, let them keep American jobs at home.
(Chuckle) I'd bet it's true. Thanks for the post!
Cronos
There are NO Chinese masters, all the companies are American.
This is not true. My neighboor is attempting to start a new company in China. His partners in Hong Kong go to the meetings with the local government officials with suitcases filled with money. I don't know how much but he told me that nothing is done without the officials' consent and said officials will not approve any step of the company's growth without bribes.
He's American. But, the only person, in America that will benefit from his start-up will be him. He is the sole person on this side of the Pacific in the company.
My point was that no American can "own" a company in China. They may operate it but the Chinese retain total control. Without massive bribes to officials there would be no company. Hence the officials are the "owners". Also, he told me that their judicial system does not follow any laws. Any appearance before a magistrate comes down to solely his decision. He does not look for precedent. At any time they can confiscate or punish without recourse.
There was an article some time back about the fallacious notion of shareholders electing board members. It's a rigged game. It had to do with the board having the ability to make the rules as they go along.
A recent study suggested the minuscule spin but news articles I read stated that the study covered only limited cases involving fifty or more jobs. To wit,
"According to the BLS report, the transfer of jobs overseas accounted for only a small fraction of total jobs lost in the first quarter of this year. The agency found that of the 182,456 people laid off between January and March, only 4,633, or 2.5 percent, were axed because of 'the movement of work outside the country.'
"Critics, however, have argued that the government sampled only a limited number of companies and therefore did not paint an accurate picture of the situation. Indeed, the survey only reported on companies with a minimum of 50 workers where at least 50 employees were laid off. The BLS itself admitted that its data do 'not reflect layoffs of less than 50 at these companies, nor do they capture lay-offs occurring at establishments with less than 50 workers.'" [End excerpt]
http://www.ecommercetimes.com/story/34432.html
BTW, Meanwhile, the General Accounting Office has been ordered by Congress to produce a report on the subject within the next few months.
[End article]
There are the little matters of open markets "over there," visas and American jobs.
The U.S. trade representative Robert Zoellick has called India one of the most closed economies in the world. Well, he's not alone. Other Bush Administration officials also call for opening markets. (see ref. below) If it is free trade why cannot U.S. companies profit from trade beyond cheap labor? The Bush Administration wants fair trade, you don't have to be a Bush-hater to want fair trade.
With L-1, and other visas (almost one million of them according to this article) "cheap" labor is now being imported as well. At least the estimated 800,000 H1B workers of a few years ago were required to be paid prevailing wages. L-1 is replacing H1B. L-1's are TDY here and get per diem. Unlike H1B's they pay no income, etc. tax, I believe.
http://www.navhindtimes.com/stories.php?part=news&Story_ID=062418
Almost one million visas plus the tech jobs outsourced off-shore. That is not minuscule.
You're quite right, of course. In many categories of consumer products such as consumer electronics, it's pretty much too late. For electronics, if you're an audiophile with a serious toy budget, you can choose American. Fortunately, for some categories of products, such as major appliances and furniture, there's still a choice.
Yes, yes, we live in a republic..yawn... by the textbook... I won't make that mistake again (not). But when we are discussing the micro associations that we actually are in (e.g. the workplace) we should think in terms of democracy.
Pursuing a work environment commensurate with education and skills are fine. Whining that co-workers in a current environment are not as educated or 'deserving' is elitist. Nekolturny?
There are a lot of computer science students who were attracted to the biz because it was fashionable being a hacker or because they enjoyed the software counter-culture. But when they're up all night trying to get their program to work (the program that reads in the list of names, alphabetizes them by last name and formats them nicely), they start to realize that maybe this isn't for them. Or maybe it's the calculus class; they get lost somewhere between integration-by-parts or trigonometric substitutions. Some of them scrape by by cheating: they scrounge code off of friends or the internet.
In earlier tech downturns, the wanna-bes and incompetents might have been weeded out. But now we see experienced, productive people -- many with fully up-to-date skill sets -- having trouble with their careers. This may well be a temporary phenomonon in an industry with a history of being cyclic. But the key point, again, is that the jobs haven't ended, they've moved, in a manner I believe to be unfair to Americans.
Currently, I am told by a colleague, if you have a PhD in computer science, you are still very much in demand. Is that where our economy is heading? Winner-take-all, with a few haves at the top? I don't think it's a good idea to have an economy where you're expected to have a doctoral degree to be successful. We're in danger of voters comparing the present economy this fall with the one five years ago.
Why? I judge who are my social equals, exclusively. If I choose not to associate with some others, so what? Would you support legislation to force me to associate with those with whom I don't want to associate?
People have always had that choice, are doing that, and will always do that. All utopias of perfect egalitarianism have been broken on the wheel of human nature. History is littered with their remains.
Yes, yes, we live in a republic..yawn... by the textbook... I won't make that mistake again (not).
You better by God hope we still live in a republic. A republic is a system of government decisions made by laws. A democracy is a system of governemnt decisions made by men. You should read about the fate of the Greek democracies.
Get real. The computer industry was targeted by greedy US manufacturers along with the people they pay off in the Congress. As a direct result something like 1 million Indian and Chinese programmers were brought into the USA. Many on contracts that cost companies 1/2 the prevailing wage. I worked at such a company. One day managers were told "you need to use Tata (Indian consultants) for all new hires. I talked to the Tatas. They lived in company provided apartments, 4 employees to one apartment. They were paid a stipend for living expenses and a flat fee for completing their contract of something like $50,000 on return to India (for two years).
What's your job? It is hard to imagine any profession that could withstand a targeted program like that. Health Care costs have certainly NOT gone in the direction of computing costs, which have been 10x cheaper every few years for 20 years. Why not bring in 1,000,000 Indian doctors? Pay them 1/2 to 1/3 the prevailing wage. Put them on contracts. Five years in a clinic, a $200,000 fee when they return home. (Sure, their M.D. degrees won't be as rigorous as the US ones, but then neither are all the Indian "Ph.D.s" in computer science.)
And no, I have never been laid off. So I have nothing to be personally upset about, so don't start with the "you can't hack competition" crap. I have withstood all this and am prospering, but it doesn't make it right, it doesn't make it good for the USA. The Indians are tools of greed heads like Scott McNealy and the other Silicon Valley zillionaires who lobbied and paid for this program. Now they are just sending the entire offices over there.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.