Skip to comments.
Human Footprints older than thought
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2005-11/uoc--a4h112805.php ^
Posted on 12/01/2005 11:01:48 AM PST by Tzimisce
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
During the early part of the 1900's scientists reasoned that if humans were related to monkies, then the evidence of human evolution would be found were monkies are found: namely Africa. This theory is largely unchallenged.
But the fossil record shows that Africa isn't the only place where primates evolved and lived. It is very possible that human life began in the United States.
But don't mention this to the scientific community or leftists. They're far to open minded, accepting, tolerant and willing to look at every point of view to allow their minds to become polluted with such filth as to even entertain this notion.
1
posted on
12/01/2005 11:01:48 AM PST
by
Tzimisce
To: Tzimisce
2
posted on
12/01/2005 11:03:08 AM PST
by
cripplecreek
(Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
To: cripplecreek
3
posted on
12/01/2005 11:06:11 AM PST
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
To: Puppage
Spitting Coffee!! I was thinking Chaka from Land of the Lost, but I'm not posting it after seeing that. LOL!
4
posted on
12/01/2005 11:07:34 AM PST
by
IllumiNaughtyByNature
(If Islam is the Religion of Peace, they should FIRE their PR guy!)
To: Puppage
What garbage dump did this evolve from?? Please nuke the site before more evolve.
5
posted on
12/01/2005 11:08:24 AM PST
by
handy old one
(It is unbecoming for young men to utter maxims. Aristotle)
To: Puppage
What garbage dump did this evolve from?? Please nuke the site before more evolve.
6
posted on
12/01/2005 11:09:12 AM PST
by
handy old one
(It is unbecoming for young men to utter maxims. Aristotle)
To: Tzimisce
You mean we are not neccessairly all descended from a lady in Africa named Helen (or whatever they call her) and are thus called by the UN to all get together and sing kumbaya?
7
posted on
12/01/2005 11:10:13 AM PST
by
Rodney King
(No, we can't all just get along.)
To: handy old one
Do they have N.A.G.P.R.A. in Mexico?
8
posted on
12/01/2005 11:12:00 AM PST
by
Donpeyote
To: Tzimisce
Kind of funny-- "Either they are footprints or they aren't..."
9
posted on
12/01/2005 11:12:52 AM PST
by
jcb8199
To: Donpeyote
Please file under mid-pacific valley!!
10
posted on
12/01/2005 11:16:25 AM PST
by
handy old one
(It is unbecoming for young men to utter maxims. Aristotle)
To: Puppage
Your example of the missing link for reverse evolution scares the hell out of me. I may never be the same and am to sceered to sleep now.
mc :>)
11
posted on
12/01/2005 11:48:08 AM PST
by
mcshot
(I BELIEVE CONGRESSMAN WELDON. Yup! shouting it out!)
To: Tzimisce
issue of Nature a new age for the rock: about 1.3 million years. Causes real problems with "Out of Africa". "Out of Mexico" is still going on.
To: Rodney King
descended from a lady in Africa named Helen Ummm... I think that was Lucy. However. post 3 does picture a neanderthal-like creature named Helen....
13
posted on
12/01/2005 12:21:59 PM PST
by
NoCmpromiz
(John 14:6 is a non-pluaralistic statement.)
To: Tzimisce
During the early part of the 1900's scientists reasoned that if humans were related to monkies, then the evidence of human evolution would be found were monkies are found: namely Africa. This theory is largely unchallenged. But the fossil record shows that Africa isn't the only place where primates evolved and lived. It is very possible that human life began in the United States.
Well I think the mitochondrial DNA shows that humans left Africa about 1 million years ago. I think, basically, there are 5 genome types of humans, 4 of which are found only in Africa. All other humans, according to this theory, are descended from a small band of humans who left Africa for the middle east and have spread to the far parts of the earth. The commmon ur-grandmother of all of us (non-Africans) is the so-called Lucy.
To: Tzimisce; All
"
Alleged footprints of early Americans found in volcanic rock in Mexico..."
Okay. All who believe humans or any other creature walked on lava that was soft enough for footprints to be formed, let's see a show of posters!
15
posted on
12/01/2005 12:29:54 PM PST
by
azhenfud
(He who always is looking up seldom finds others' lost change.)
To: mcshot; Puppage
My Gosh!
I clicked on that "[to 3]" thingy and that face popped up, said "BOO!", and my heart stopped for a second!
That's not good!
16
posted on
12/01/2005 12:33:45 PM PST
by
azhenfud
(He who always is looking up seldom finds others' lost change.)
17
posted on
04/25/2006 12:12:30 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
18
posted on
02/12/2007 10:15:36 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(I last updated my profile on Saturday, February 3, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: Tzimisce
This is absolutely hilarious! I was cracking up at my computer.
It reminds me of those young earth guys that said some dating techniques would date freshly cooled lava at thousands or millions of years old.
They may have been more correct in their criticisms than many would care to admit.
The more we know, the more we know we don't know.
19
posted on
02/12/2007 10:21:30 PM PST
by
RobRoy
(Islam is a greater threat to the world today than Nazism was in 1938.)
To: Jack Black
20
posted on
02/12/2007 10:25:23 PM PST
by
Tzimisce
(How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President! www.dndorks.com)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson