Posted on 01/02/2006 11:47:34 AM PST by blam
Researchers Shed New Lights on Origin of Ancient Chinese Civilization
Chinese ancients living 3,500 to 4,500 years ago already had many choices for meal, including millet, wheat and rice, which are still the staple food of the Chinese.
They also compiled calendars according to their astronomical observation, which is regarded as one of the symbols of the origin of civilization.
They made exquisite bronze vessels to hold wine and food, and some of the bronze vessels were later developed into symbol of the supreme imperial power.
But how the Chinese civilization started and evolved remains a magnetic topic that has cost the lifelong efforts of generations of scholars.
After five years of intensive study, researchers engaged in a grand archaeological project have drawn an outline of the Chinese society 3,500 to 4,500 years ago, the most important period that researchers believe is closely related to the origin of ancient Chinese civilization.
China launched the archaeological project in 2001, aiming to seek the origin of ancient Chinese civilization, the only one in the world that has kept developing for 5,000 years without interruption.
Researchers try to find answers to such questions as whether Huangdi and Yandi, two legendary ancestors of the Chinese nation, really existed in history, and whether there were any Chinese characters even older than the inscriptions on animal bones and tortoise shells discovered in the famous Yin Ruins, which date back to over 3,000 years.
"To study the origin and development process of ancient Chinese civilization is an important contribution to the research into human history," said Wang Wei, one of the leading archaeologists of the project.
Wang, deputy director of the Institute of Archaeology under the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, told Xinhua that the first stage of the project has just concluded, while the second and the third stage will last another ten years.
During the past five years, archaeologists designated six major sites of cultural heritage -- the Neolithic Xipo Site in Lingbao County, Wangchenggang Site in Dengfeng, Xinzhai Site in Xinmi County, Erlitou Site in Yanshi County and Dashigu Site in Zhengzhou, all in central Henan Province, and the Taosi Site in Xiangfen, in neighboring Shanxi Province.
The six sites were all large-scale towns in prehistoric China, and provided material crucial to the study of social structures and the emergence of the early states in the mysterious 1,000 years before the Shang Dynasty (1,600 BC-1,100 BC), said Wang.
Research into the Taosi Site shows that the differentiation of social classes in ancient China can be dated back to 2,300 BC. And the notion of state sovereignty also emerged at that time, said Wang.
More than 1,000 tombs have been excavated at the site, and a large number of funerary objects were found in about 10 percent of the tombs, which researchers believe belonged to those from the highest social estate.
Magnetic prospecting technologies were used to probe relics of an ancient city, covering an area of 3 million square meters, at Taosi. Archaeologists have found remains of a bloody war, which destroyed the city about 4,100 years ago.
The construction of capital city and palaces, production of bronze wares and weapons, emergence of characters are regarded as factors contributing to the formation of the ancient Chinese civilization.
At the Erlitou Site in Henan Province, archaeologists found the earliest palace complex ever discovered in China. Many Chinese scholars believe that Erlitou is the site of the capital of the Xia Dynasty (2,100 BC-1,600 BC), China's first dynasty.
The palace complex has a clear central line as all large structures and roads are distributed evenly at either side of the line. The design created a model for later dynasties in designing their capital, experts say.
The origin of Chinese civilization has long been a complicated and confusing problem in China's academic circles.
Recent archaeological discoveries show that there were many advanced cultures at the valleys of several major rivers in China about 4,000 to 5,000 years ago.
The civilization in central China, though not the most developed at beginning, absorbed the cultures in the surrounding areas, forming the splendid Chinese civilization, said Wang.
In the coming five years, the research will be expanded from central China to valleys of the Yangtze, Yellow, Liaohe and Huaihe rivers, covering the period from 4,000 BC to 770 BC.
More than 1,000 researchers from over 20 branches of learning including archaeology, philology, anthropology, history of art, linguistics, religious study, astronomy, genetics, remote sensing and radar detection, will participate in the project, Wang added.
(Xinhua News Agency January 2, 2006)
GGG Ping.
With China opening a bit more every year I wonder how much longer before all the history books will need to be rewritten. The "cradle of civilzation" might have to move. As a word of caution, don't take Chinese finds as fact until there has been a open peer review. They have been caught with faked artifacts in the past.
During the past five years, archaeologists designated six major sites of cultural heritage . . . all in central Henan Province [except] the Taosi Site in Xiangfen, in neighboring Shanxi Province.
With the super nationalistic Chinese, no influences outside Henan or Shanxi are worth considering. To everyone else, the merger of several cultural influences created the truly remarkable Chinese civilization. Imagine studying Greek Civilization while ignoring Anatolian influences.
I vote for public works projects as the origin of Chinese civilization. Floodworks, mainly.
So you mean Yu the Great? The legend credits him with massive flood control effort, IIRC.
Yeah. They tried a couple of approaches before they found something that worked. Had to do something because the floods were really bad.
It's funny how they always want to ignore India's ancient past.
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on or off the
"Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list or GGG weekly digest
-- Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)
The "ancient Chinese" in the headline reminds me of the old un-PC commercial where the guy running the Chinese laundry tells his customer his shirts are perfect because of "ancient Chinese secret" ... then his wife clues in the audience that her husband is a wiseguy, and the ancient Chinese secret is ..... uhhh ... I don't remember. Some American laundry product they were peddling.
WHAT WAS IT?
A lure for more tourism?
I'm not convinced these people are trustworthy in their claims ... they've been known to lie before.
Considering the source, everything the Communist Chinese say, must be taken with a bit more than a grain of salt.
Truth is NOT in them.
"We need more Calgon!" "Ancient Chinese secret, eh?"
Wow, that really wouldn't go over very well today, eh? Neither would "Chinese Cherry" Koolaid, the Frito Bandito...
|
|
|||
Gods |
Just updating the GGG info, not sending a general distribution. |
||
|
· Discover · Nat Geographic · Texas AM Anthro News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · Google · · The Archaeology Channel · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists · |
|||
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.