Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Abortion in Cases of Rape: Why Not Kill the Guilty Rapist Before the Innocent Child
LifeSiteNews ^ | 8/25/06 | John-Henry Westen

Posted on 08/25/2006 3:11:34 PM PDT by wagglebee

In Canada and most other liberal countries capital punishment is outlawed and usually opposed by a healthy majority of the population.  That is all well and good.  I too oppose capital punishment in those nations where the penal system is sufficient to keep dangerous criminals out of harms way.

However, many of these so-called liberal countries, accept abortion, and most began their acceptance of abortion with accepting abortion in the hard cases of rape and incest.  

However, in a civilized country we punish the guilty and not the innocent.  So why are we suggesting capital punishment for the innocent unborn child rather than the guilty rapist?  

We do not usually suggest criminal penalty for the children of those who commit crimes so why are we suggesting capital punishment for the child of the rapist?

Secondly, abortion is harmful to the women that undergo it.  Childbirth is a natural function that women's bodies were made for. Abortion is not.  Abortion is a traumatic event psychologically, emotionally, spiritually and physically.  

Why are we giving more trauma to the victim of rape by encouraging her to abort her child?  

Carrying such a child to term has been for many women a help in coming to grips with the abuse they suffered.  Many victims of rape and children born of such attacks have testified to these truths.

For more information on the harmful effects of abortion on women we suggest contacting Silent No More Awareness Campaign.

http://www.silentnomoreawareness.org



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; capitalpunishment; moralabsolutes; prolife; rape
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-276 next last
To: Dianna

Actually, some people on this forum would condemn you just as much whatever day you took the pills, since they'd decide the intent was the same, and since their knowledge of biological issues in general is pretty limited (look at all the posters who think the morning after pill and RU-486 are exactly the same thing!).


241 posted on 08/26/2006 7:33:31 AM PDT by linda_22003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: Delphinium
"Should she be allowed to kill her rapist?"

I've already answered that to the affirmative. I have no moral dilemma with that.

I will add to my previous answer however, I am referring specifically to violent rape and child rape cases. I DO NOT want to see an 18 year old executed for having sex with his 17 year old girlfriend (statutory rape).

There is however a post (#191) that makes a strong argument for not allowing executions based on the fear that rapists would be more likely to silence their victims. I'm still chewing on that one.
242 posted on 08/26/2006 7:42:57 AM PDT by ndt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: Chena
the mindset of a child rape victim is greatly affected by the mother, grandmother, or other caregivers around her.

You are right. The mindset of rape victims are greatly affected by those around them. More than ever, she needs people to be honest with her. As she gets older & more mature, she'll either think it's okay to tell loved ones half truths (for their own good, of course) or she will feel betrayed so badly, she'll mistrust those who tell her they love her. Depriving someone of the information they need to make an *informed choice* can have unforeseeable consequences.

How they handle it is crucial. If they tell the child that this is a BABY, that puts the picture of a cooing, little one in her head. If they refer to the pregnancy as a seed, or an egg, she may not suffer as badly if she chose to end the pregnancy.

She will not have "chosen" if she has been told it was only a seed or an egg. She gets older, gets married, gets pregnant or has trouble getting pregnant, your words intended to comfort her, to push her to abort may come back to haunt her. Equating a human life to an egg or a seed is dishonest.

If I was the mother, I would do what is right for my child.

Lying to your child to get them to do what you think they should do isn't doing right by anyone. Children know, which is why you skirt around calling a human life a baby. At the very least, be honest with yourself & stop rationalizing the lie.

And I know, I would never force her to give birth. I simply could not do that to her. And I firmly believe that God would understand, and if not, He would forgive.

God forgives, but first we must repent. If we keep lying to ourselves, we are not able to repent. Bearing false witness against our unborn grandchild, to promote their execution...

243 posted on 08/26/2006 9:23:33 AM PDT by GoLightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Dianna

I'm not an expert biologist and I'll probably have some fellow Catholics screaming for my blood, but I believe that life begins with the creation of individual DNA, unique from the mother. Can't remember when that occurs--sometime in the first 24-72 hours or something. At that point, it is not, scientifically, a matter of "It's my body and I'll do with it what I choose." It is someone else's body, located in potentially hostile territory.


244 posted on 08/26/2006 10:47:53 AM PDT by grellis (I don't know, let me ask my I Ching)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: xzins

The problem is, you are killing an innocent victim with an abortion, not the person who committed the crime. Not only that, but contrary to popular belief, abortion is a traumatic experience for women. I've known many women who've had an abortion and not one of them was better off after the abortion than they were before it, including one I knew who got pregnant after a rape. She still cries about the abortion whenever she speaks of it, even though it happened 30 years ago!


245 posted on 08/26/2006 11:06:48 AM PDT by Hammer-of-Heretics (Hammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Excellent.

Why punish an innocent child for a crime his father committed?


246 posted on 08/26/2006 4:04:43 PM PDT by Commander8 (Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth? Galatians 4:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ndt

Yes. I would encourage, more than encourage them to not murder their own child because of the circumstances of the conception, and I'm not ashamed to say so. IT IS THEIR CHILD TOO.


247 posted on 08/26/2006 5:14:54 PM PDT by Shimmer128 (I've seen the village, I don't want it raising my children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ndt

You had said previously of my decision that my choice proves that I do not "actually hold a fertilized egg as being equivalent to a human life" because I would save the babies rather than the eggs. I think your answer to my counter-hypothetical illustrates that you make a faulty conclusion.


248 posted on 08/26/2006 6:44:21 PM PDT by Proud2BAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: linda_22003
what "sentence" does a woman receive now if she has an abortion?

No sentence. This is exactly the problem.

In my view, the penalty for abortion should be by default exactly the same as for murder, but of course clemency should be given women who abort following a rape, or due to some other stressful cuircumstance, just like in the case of murder, murderers who commit that crime in strained circumstance often get clemency.

problem is that you seem to think RU-486 and the morning after pill are the same thing.

Thery are not the same thing, but all three: the usual contraception, morning after pill recently in the news, and chemical abortion agents all have an abortifacient component, in various degrees of strength.

249 posted on 08/26/2006 6:55:43 PM PDT by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

Comment #250 Removed by Moderator

To: vox_freedom

Not sure, no picture or whatever ....


251 posted on 08/26/2006 7:43:26 PM PDT by SkyDancer ("The Americans on Flight 93 did more to counter terrorism than the Democrats have done in 4 years")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer
Skydancer,
Sorry, it was just a picture of a monkey watersking, which was a lame excuse/graphic for saying another "OK."
Thanks for the exchange.
252 posted on 08/26/2006 8:29:26 PM PDT by vox_freedom (Matthew 5:37 But let your speech be yea, yea: no, no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: ndt
here is however a post (#191) that makes a strong argument for not allowing executions based on the fear that rapists would be more likely to silence their victims. I'm still chewing on that one.

That would be like cowarding to terrorists so the might not hurt us.

I believe the child is innocent and should never die for the crime of his father.

Interesting coincidence that I was just having a conversation with one of my neighbors. I found out that she had been the victim of a "statutory rape" by a rapist who I was court ordered as the counselor after he got released from prison. All these years I had only knew his side of the story. And I felt he got a bad deal because he was only 18, and she was almost 17. Turns out it was an extremely violent rape. She said the very saddest part was that she miscarried the baby she had become pregnant with as a result of the rape. She is a very good and loving mother of two, but still loves that child she lost.

That child was precious and innocent, not a rapist.

But for the sake of the 97% of abortions that are for birth control reasons, I would allow for rape, incest and the life of the mother.
253 posted on 08/26/2006 8:32:11 PM PDT by Delphinium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; american colleen; annalex; ...


254 posted on 08/26/2006 10:30:56 PM PDT by Coleus (Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, birds, algae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: annalex

Do you feel that the rapist should have his sentence reduced as well because his first innocent victem chose the death penalty for his second innocent victem in the form of abortion?


255 posted on 08/26/2006 10:48:29 PM PDT by F.J. Mitchell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ndt
Many consider it traumatic to give birth to the child of a rapist.

Many consider it traumatic to allow the rapist to live.

256 posted on 08/26/2006 10:53:55 PM PDT by gitmo (From now on, ending a sentence with a preposition is something up with which I will not put.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gitmo
"Many consider it traumatic to allow the rapist to live."

As I stated down post, I have no moral problem with executing a violent rapist, which I do not define to include an 18 year old having sex with his 17 year old girlfriend.

Another poster did make a good argument that executing rapists could result in more rape victims being killed to prevent testimony. But from an ethical position I'm OK with it.
257 posted on 08/26/2006 11:03:57 PM PDT by ndt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: ndt

It is moral for a nation to execute a violent serial rapist provided due process was given.
An unborn child no matter the circumstance of the conception committed no crime and must be allowed to live.


258 posted on 08/27/2006 12:03:01 AM PDT by Bill Whatcott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

To: annalex

If abortion ever becomes illegal, you're never going to see a murder penalty for the woman. There never was one before, when it was illegal. The doctor wasn't even punished as though it were murder.


259 posted on 08/27/2006 2:59:29 AM PDT by linda_22003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: vox_freedom

SeaYa


260 posted on 08/27/2006 11:48:50 AM PDT by SkyDancer ("The Americans on Flight 93 did more to counter terrorism than the Democrats have done in 4 years")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-276 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson