Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

He's Got Guts: In praise of Chuck Hagel. (Peggy Noonan finally jumps the shark!)
The Wall Street Journal Opinion Journal ^ | January 26, 2007 | Peggy Noonan

Posted on 01/25/2007 9:14:42 PM PST by quidnunc

We all complain, and with justice, about the falseness of much that is said in Washington, and the cowardice that leaves a great deal unsaid. But I found myself impressed and grateful for the words of Chuck Hagel, the Republican senator from Nebraska, in a meeting of the Foreign Relations Committee on Wednesday. Because his message was not one Republicans or Democrats would find congenial, it may be accidentally dropped down the memory hole, so I'll quote at some length.

The committee was nearing a vote on what was, essentially, an announcement of no confidence in the administration's leadership in Iraq. Specifically it was a nonbinding resolution opposing the increase in troops the president has requested. This was not significant in a concrete way: The president has the power to send more troops, and they are already arriving. But as symbols go, it packed a punch. You couldn't watch it on television or on the Internet and not see that Mr. Hagel was letting it rip. He did not speak from notes or a text but while looking at his fellow senators. There seemed no time lag between thought and word. He was barreling, he was giving it to you straight, and he'd pick up the pieces later.

This is what he said: Congress has duties; in the case of the war, meeting those duties was not convenient; Congress did not meet them.

-snip-

(Excerpt) Read more at opinionjournal.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Political Humor/Cartoons
KEYWORDS: chuckhagel; hagel; noonan; peggynoonan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-152 next last
To: Sun

In my opinion? Yes. In some ways, on some topics. She's hit some out of the ballpark, but her thinking on Iraq is wrongheaded. She's starting to think (and sound) like the liberals do. Also with George Bush there has been a surprising negativity. At times it seems - though we are in no position to know - that she is predisposed to it. That, too, is more like a liberal than a conservative.


21 posted on 01/25/2007 9:34:39 PM PST by Irish Rose (Will work for chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: woofie

coulda been the whiskey
mighta been the gin
coulda been the 3 or 4 six packs, I don't know
But look at the mess I'm in....


22 posted on 01/25/2007 9:35:11 PM PST by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Possibly her lips were wet. Was it whiskey or something else? I do not know.


23 posted on 01/25/2007 9:35:32 PM PST by elhombrelibre (After 9/11, Bush went to war with terrorists and their supporters. Democrats war against him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Eva

She was speech writer for Reagan and George HW Bush.


24 posted on 01/25/2007 9:35:50 PM PST by Pan_Yans Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

Spot on, JW.


25 posted on 01/25/2007 9:36:22 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre

Something else.


26 posted on 01/25/2007 9:38:55 PM PST by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
This is what he said: Congress has duties; in the case of the war, meeting those duties was not convenient; Congress did not meet them.

I think it's more to the point to say that Congress made the right decision in 2002; keeping faith with that decision became inconvenient; Congress is now trying to find a way out.

27 posted on 01/25/2007 9:39:36 PM PST by RichInOC (Thatcher '08: Accept No Substitutes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

Et tu, Brute?


28 posted on 01/25/2007 9:39:41 PM PST by Eagles6 (Dig deeper, more ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Irish Rose

A lot of Reagan's people have no use for either of the Bushes. As I remember, Lyn Nofziger wasn't too fond of this president either.


29 posted on 01/25/2007 9:40:28 PM PST by streetpreacher (What if you're wrong?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

Okay we had Hanoi Jane--now we have Tehran Chuck.. how about some sly Photoshoppers help here :)


30 posted on 01/25/2007 9:41:59 PM PST by hatfieldmccoy (Satan has a new name and it is Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

If Hagel and the rest of the punks had "guts" they wouldn't be making a non-binding resolution. They are gutless. Peggy is clueless.


31 posted on 01/25/2007 9:42:31 PM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife

I am very familar with Peggy Noonan's past history, but that doesn't make her a good fit for G.W. Bush. She wanted to make him over in Reagan's image and it couldn't be done. He's better off being who he is. Noonan has turned into a witch since she was turned down. I guess she couldn't take the criticism. Anyway, the Granny knows best crowd is a better fit for her.


32 posted on 01/25/2007 9:42:52 PM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
(Peggy Noonan finally jumps the shark!)

Yes because we all know definition of jumping the shark is criticizing the President or anything that comes from his mouth. Good on Chuck Hagel for standing up for what he believes and any other Republican who finally discovers the reason for the Legislative Branch's existence is not a rubber stamp of anything the Executive Branch wants to do.

One can only hope the past 3 years is the death knell of the neoconservative movement and interventionist foreign policies. From the speeches coming even from original Congressional supporters of the police action in Iraq, it looks like it very well may be.

33 posted on 01/25/2007 9:47:04 PM PST by billbears (Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
The Democrats have no idea what they stand for, the Republicans only remember what they stood for.

There's a tagline in there somewhere.

34 posted on 01/25/2007 9:47:14 PM PST by DCPatriot ("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Eva
She has had her nowe in a snit ever since Bush turned down her offer to write his speeches for the 2004 election.

You nailed it. She's bitterly against George W. Bush now. It's sad, she's lost her credibility with me.

35 posted on 01/25/2007 9:48:40 PM PST by alicewonders
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Hagel's empty posturing, like his symbolic vote, has only one PRACTICAL consequence: it gives aid and comfort to our enemies who see in our disunity at home the seeds of a victory they can never win on the battlefield. Many of the Democrats in the Senate--Kerry, Kennedy, Durbin, Feingold, Feinstein, Levin, Leahy, Dodd, Boxer--actually WANT a strategic American defeat. In their case at least, the vote is logical, consistent with the treasonous and disloyal ethos that increasingly characterizes the Democratic Party.
Hagel is a coward and an opportunist. He saw the plaudits he got from the national media for stabbing a president in the back in time of war. Now Noonan joins in. Well she can say what she wants to: Hagel is low, vile, disloyal, unpatriotic, despicable human being who is knowingly giving aid and comfort to those who would murder Americans in their millions.
36 posted on 01/25/2007 9:49:01 PM PST by Godwin1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: pissant
I don't see anything in her column to disagree with.

Do you?

37 posted on 01/25/2007 9:49:29 PM PST by DCPatriot ("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

Maybe she's auditioning for a gig on PMSNBC.


38 posted on 01/25/2007 9:51:28 PM PST by onyx (DEFEAT Hillary Clinton, Marxist, student of Saul Alinsky & ally and beneficiary of Soros.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

Not


39 posted on 01/25/2007 9:54:19 PM PST by HANG THE EXPENSE (Defeat liberalism, its the right thing to do for America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alicewonders

I was never a fan of her flowery style of writing. I prefer plain speech, but ever since she was turned down as a speech writer for G.W., she has been overly critical, and just plain nasty. It's time for Peggy to retire, she's beginning to sound like the old folks at community association meetings. They drive me crazy, everything is about the way it used to be in their previous life.


40 posted on 01/25/2007 9:55:09 PM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-152 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson