Sorry, you don't know the difference between evidence and interpretations of evidence.
The long-ages are assumed and the evidence is interpreted in that context. Just like this protein evidence that shouldn't be there. Just like the blood vessel evidence that shouldn't be there. Just like the dinosaur likenesses that shouldn't be there. Just like the ancient stories that shouldn't be there. It doesn't fit, therefore it is tossed out.
No one ever considers that the dating scheme might be wrong because that is based on wishful thinking. It's the naturalist equivalent of a miracle.
It also lets you dismiss different opinions as stupidity and you like that.
“It also lets you dismiss different opinions as stupidity and you like that.”
No, I don’t like that. But your posts are taking on such a reaching and gigantic silliness factor, that they are becoming unworthy of argument. You can’t poo-poo away the facts here.