Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hot tempers on global warming
boston.com ^ | August 15, 2007 | By Jeff Jacoby

Posted on 08/17/2007 7:18:52 PM PDT by Reform Canada

JEFF JACOBY Hot tempers on global warming By Jeff Jacoby, Globe Columnist | August 15, 2007 First of two parts INTRODUCING Newsweek's Aug. 13 cover story on global warming "denial," editor Jon Meacham brings up an embarrassing blast from his magazine's past: an April 1975 story about global cooling, and the coming ice age that scientists then were predicting. Meacham concedes that "those who doubt that greenhouse gases are causing significant climate change have long pointed to the 1975 Newsweek piece as an example of how wrong journalists and researchers can be." But rather than acknowledge that the skeptics may have a point, Meacham dismisses it. "On global cooling," he writes, "there was never anything even remotely approaching the current scientific consensus that the world is growing warmer because of the emission of greenhouse gases." Really? Newsweek took rather a different line in 1975. Then, the magazine reported that scientists were "almost unanimous" in believing that the looming Big Chill would mean a decline in food production, with some warning that "the resulting famines could be catastrophic." Moreover, it said, "the evidence in support of these predictions" -- everything from shrinking growing seasons to increased North American snow cover -- had "begun to accumulate so massively that meteorologists are hard-pressed to keep up with it." Yet Meacham, quoting none of this, simply brushes aside the 1975 report as "alarmist" and "discredited." Today, he assures his readers, Newsweek's climate-change anxieties rest "on the safest of scientific ground." Do they?

(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: catastrophism; climatechange; globalwarming; ipcc; kyoto
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

1 posted on 08/17/2007 7:18:54 PM PDT by Reform Canada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: fanfan; GMMAC; xcamel; DaveLoneRanger; Baynative; calcowgirl; sourcery; Clive; sionnsar; ...

ping


2 posted on 08/17/2007 7:19:44 PM PDT by Reform Canada (Kyoto=>More Unemployment=>More Poverty=>More Homeless=>More Crime=>More Rape & Murder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reform Canada

bump


3 posted on 08/17/2007 7:21:42 PM PDT by Roberts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reform Canada

***”On global cooling,” he writes, “there was never anything even remotely approaching the current scientific consensus that the world is growing warmer because of the emission of greenhouse gases.” ***

If it’s concensus, it ain’t scientific. Science deals with FACT, not concensus.


4 posted on 08/17/2007 7:23:10 PM PDT by irishtenor (There is no "I" in team, but there are two in IDIOT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Roberts

Very hard to be consistent and faithful when your religion (global warming) has no God.


5 posted on 08/17/2007 7:23:26 PM PDT by Patrick1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Reform Canada

The truth is that global warming would be far more benevolent to mankind than global cooling.


6 posted on 08/17/2007 7:23:44 PM PDT by saganite (Billions and billions and billions----and that's just the NASA budget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reform Canada
Meacham dismisses it. "On global cooling," he writes,

What a poor answer. If he wanted to make a better case he could have started the discussion off with something like the first weather satellites were just getting going in 1974 (approx) or something like that. That would have made for a much better argument.
7 posted on 08/17/2007 7:24:20 PM PDT by P-40 (Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reform Canada
To steal from Dennis Miller.......

we are talking about 1.8 degrees over 100 years...

does anyone else find that to be remarkably stable?

I sure as hell do.

8 posted on 08/17/2007 7:24:45 PM PDT by Nitro (Nitro does it with a BANG!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reform Canada

It’s about a Fabian Socialist agenda. Evidence and facts mean nothing. Mis-leading the Sheeple means everything.


9 posted on 08/17/2007 7:26:07 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Elections have consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reform Canada

10 posted on 08/17/2007 7:30:19 PM PDT by HighWheeler (The higher the concentration of libs, the bigger the tragedy that follows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reform Canada
"The greatest dangers to liberty," Justice Louis Brandeis wrote, "lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding."

Global warming enthusiasts are "nen of zeal", to be sure. And clearly "without understanding".

But "well-meaning"? I'm not so sure...

There are the power-trippers, the crooks and the dupes. Which, do you suppose, is Algore...???

11 posted on 08/17/2007 7:30:22 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: irishtenor

I agree with you...smart point.

Global warming caused by humans is not universally accepted among qualified scientists. And if Al Hore thinks we can do anything about it, well, he should have said that in 1900 because the world is based on oil, and that isn’t gonna change for a long time.


12 posted on 08/17/2007 7:30:26 PM PDT by camerakid400
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Reform Canada

Even the worst characterizations of McCarthy by the Left are minimal compared to the fundamentalist, jihad like religious fervor of the warm-mongers. In rhetoric at least, and thankfully not action, they are rapidly approaching demanding adherence to dogma unseen since the Spanish Inquisition.


13 posted on 08/17/2007 7:31:42 PM PDT by Free Vulcan (Fight the illegal Mexican colonizers & imperialist conquistadors! Long live the resistance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: camerakid400

Before that it was wood and coal heating the American home. How much pollution do you think that caused?


14 posted on 08/17/2007 7:33:46 PM PDT by irishtenor (There is no "I" in team, but there are two in IDIOT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Reform Canada; All

NOT ONE MENTION of the NASA temperature manipulation and coverup scandal.


15 posted on 08/17/2007 7:35:43 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nitro

[does anyone else find that to be remarkably stable?]

Especially when the temperature range in our science ranges from Abaolute zero (-273 deg. C- -459F) to a hot coffee temp on the sun of a few million degrees F/C, who’s counting?

Our earths temperature ranges from -100F or so at pole extremes to +140F or so in equatorial climes. So 1.8 degrees is a pimple on Algores sizeable butt!


16 posted on 08/17/2007 7:37:19 PM PDT by dbacks (I forgot to pay the rent on my tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Reform Canada

I am so tired of this fake “issue”.


17 posted on 08/17/2007 7:48:48 PM PDT by yldstrk (My heros have always been cowboys--Reagan and Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dbacks
I thought 'Kelvin' was colder than that...

am I wrong?

18 posted on 08/17/2007 7:51:35 PM PDT by Nitro (Nitro does it with a BANG!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: irishtenor
How much pollution do you think that caused?

A lot...but it led to more premature deaths due to indoor air polluted with particulates...which is why so many die in Africa from this, ironically. Al Gore's 'detractor' at the Global Warming hearings the House had in March points this out in his last book.
19 posted on 08/17/2007 7:54:40 PM PDT by P-40 (Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: saganite
The truth is that global warming would be far more benevolent to mankind than global cooling.

You should read the book of the man that testified after Gore...that he did not stick around to talk to...nor did the other Democrats. A good read.

http://www.lomborg.com/
20 posted on 08/17/2007 7:56:43 PM PDT by P-40 (Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson