Skip to comments.
Muslims discover Ron Paul (Anti-Zionists encouraged to register republican and send Paul money)
WordPress.com ^
| November 18, 2007
| mariahussain
Posted on 11/19/2007 6:00:13 AM PST by tlb
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-255 next last
To: jrooney
Rudy does not want to surrender to al Qaeda that killed 3000 of our innocent civilians and wants to behead us all for being Americans. And he's a pro-abortion gun-grabber. Those issues are more important to me personally. Thompson, Hunter, McCain or Romney would be just as good as Rudy on the WoT anyway. I really cannot conceive of any non-fanboy reasoning to support Rudy.
41
posted on
11/19/2007 7:16:10 AM PST
by
jmc813
(.) (.)
To: svcw
Ok, I want an apology from all those RP supporters who excoriated me for saying RP was anti-semtic. He is.
Actually, Dr. Paul has made only one appearance at Arab-American Institute as did many other GOP candidates. And he is just as willing to appear at Jewish conferences if they invite him. RP goes pretty much wherever he's invited and always has.
The main appeal and effort in Arabic and Muslim circles has come from the RP grassroots supporters. We ran a very nice ad in Dearborn, MI to appeal to the large Arab community there, for instance.
Just spreading terrorism in our own special way with free speech and inclusion of all Americans, even those people so evil as to be born of Arab ancestry (including the majority of Arabs in America who are and have always been Christians).
42
posted on
11/19/2007 7:16:28 AM PST
by
George W. Bush
(Apres moi, le deluge.)
To: svcw
Ok, I want an apology from all those RP supporters who excoriated me for saying RP was anti-semtic. He is.You're on crack.
43
posted on
11/19/2007 7:17:12 AM PST
by
jmc813
(.) (.)
To: KDD
al Qaeda took its shot and wanted to take down the towers then. When it failed, they had to come up with a better plan to do it, which they planned over three years and did. Not surprising you Paulnut would try and prop Clinton up when your choice for POTUS would treat al Qaeda the same way Clinton did.
44
posted on
11/19/2007 7:17:13 AM PST
by
jrooney
(The democrats are the friend of our enemy and the enemy of our friends. Attack them, not GW!)
To: GulfBreeze
Most of us would question our candidate if Mooselips were supporting them, but not the Kookites. They just close their eyes and ears while they mumble Constitution. His support is starting to look like the Blazing Saddles Gang.
Pray for W and Our Freedom Fighters
45
posted on
11/19/2007 7:17:32 AM PST
by
bray
(Think "Betray U.S." Think Democrat)
To: George W. Bush
Attacking a fellow poster over a minor typo is a sign of someone with an extremely weak position.
46
posted on
11/19/2007 7:17:36 AM PST
by
thecabal
To: GulfBreeze
Vote For Ron Paul! Because your local terrorist network supports him... Which candidates support foreign aid to Arab countries and a "Palestinian Peace Plan"?
To: jmc813
If my choices are Rudy and Paul, Rudy gets my vote. The most important issue to me and my family is the WOT. Ron Paul wants to surrender to al Qaeda. That is a dis-qualifier to be commander in chief.
48
posted on
11/19/2007 7:20:04 AM PST
by
jrooney
(The democrats are the friend of our enemy and the enemy of our friends. Attack them, not GW!)
To: tlb
Oh, this is too good :)
49
posted on
11/19/2007 7:20:17 AM PST
by
reagan_fanatic
(Ron Paul put the cuckoo in my Cocoa Puffs)
To: jmc813
No. But if I were I would be thinner and more able to take these RP supporters.
50
posted on
11/19/2007 7:20:36 AM PST
by
svcw
(There is no plan B.)
To: tlb
Muslims and Americans
That is exactly how they view themselves...all the privileges of living here in order to destroy us from within.
51
posted on
11/19/2007 7:21:00 AM PST
by
eleni121
(+ En Touto Nika! By this sign conquer! + Constantine the Great)
To: jmc813
Ron Paul totally disregards the Federal Governments responsibility to protect the lives of the unborn. (I.E. He is NOT prolife anymore than Hillary Clinton)
&
Ron Paul totally disregards the importance of having any sort of codification of REAL marriage and the inherent rights thereof. (I.E. He is JUST as much of a gay marriage accomdator as John Edwards.)
Those issues are pretty important too me.
52
posted on
11/19/2007 7:22:35 AM PST
by
GulfBreeze
(Support America? Then support Duncan Hunter.)
To: tlb
Its a false term to make people think were fighting Hitler,
Mufti fighting hard
53
posted on
11/19/2007 7:24:54 AM PST
by
eleni121
(+ En Touto Nika! By this sign conquer! + Constantine the Great)
To: jrooney
which they planned over three years and did.The second attack came 9 years later.
54
posted on
11/19/2007 7:29:07 AM PST
by
KDD
(Ron Paul did not approve this post)
To: KDD; jrooney
Who’s advising Ron Paul on the Al Qaeda threat anyway? Bagdad Bob?
55
posted on
11/19/2007 7:31:39 AM PST
by
GulfBreeze
(Support America? Then support Duncan Hunter.)
To: jrooney
The most important issue to me and my family is the WOT.Fair enough. Please just respect those of us whose main concerns are the 2nd Amendment, small government and abortion and prefer Paul over Rudy. I'm a Thompson supporter personally, but I still like Ron Paul due to his outstanding domestic positions.
56
posted on
11/19/2007 7:32:22 AM PST
by
jmc813
(.) (.)
To: Alter Kaker
Ron Pauls base is the oddest assortment of weirdos from every political stripe imaginable. I imagine Ron Paul meetups have got to be like the bar scene in Star Wars: the far right, the far left, peaceniks, klan members, jihadists, random Texas constituents, objectivists and pot smokers. That's the final word as far as I'm concerned. Good call!
57
posted on
11/19/2007 7:32:42 AM PST
by
Niteranger68
(Questions are free. Answers are $1. Correct answers are $5.)
To: incindiary
I've been on Paul supporting sites and I haven't seen any communists (that's hilarious, btw) or Nazis, and very few Muslims. That's because you are either blind or lying. Do you Paulists actually think we are stupid, when you pretend that your candidate has no massive support from the rabidly leftist anti-war crowd and the screwballs from stormfront? And the Islamos for obvious reasons have the greatest interest in Paul as President. Bizarro world indeed.
58
posted on
11/19/2007 7:33:11 AM PST
by
SolidWood
("I knew my God was bigger than his. I knew that my God was a real God and his was an idol.")
To: GulfBreeze
Ron Paul totally disregards the Federal Governments responsibility to protect the lives of the unborn. (I.E. He is NOT prolife anymore than Hillary Clinton)The right of an innocent, unborn child to life is at the heart of the American ideals of liberty. My professional and legislative record demonstrates my strong commitment to this pro-life principle.
In 40 years of medical practice, I never once considered performing an abortion, nor did I ever find abortion necessary to save the life of a pregnant woman.
In Congress, I have authored legislation that seeks to define life as beginning at conception, HR 1094.
I am also the prime sponsor of HR 300, which would negate the effect of Roe v Wade by removing the ability of federal courts to interfere with state legislation to protect life. This is a practical, direct approach to ending federal court tyranny which threatens our constitutional republic and has caused the deaths of 45 million of the unborn.
I have also authored HR 1095, which prevents federal funds to be used for so-called population control.
Many talk about being pro-life. I have taken direct action to restore protection for the unborn.
As an OB/GYN doctor, Ive delivered over 4,000 babies. That experience has made me an unshakable foe of abortion. Many of you may have read my book, Challenge To Liberty, which champions the idea that there cannot be liberty in a society unless the rights of all innocents are protected. Much can be understood about the civility of a society in observing its regard for the dignity of human life.
59
posted on
11/19/2007 7:34:41 AM PST
by
jmc813
(.) (.)
To: SolidWood; SoCalPol
Excellent! Bears repeating....
...broad coalition of criminally insane Nazis, Muslims and Communists.
Paul's cut and run plan would be more dangerous than when Clinton just ignored them. Paul's plan would empower AQ and they would rebuild with renewed energy and confidence that they have defeated the U.S.!
60
posted on
11/19/2007 7:34:50 AM PST
by
CAluvdubya
(DUNCAN HUNTER '08)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-255 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson