Aerial photograph showing Caistor Roman Town from the south. The streets are clearly visible as marks in the grass, from the air. © Mike Page.
Posted on 12/13/2007 12:45:32 PM PST by blam
Stunning survey unveils new secrets of Caistor Roman town
PA280/07 — December 13 2007
On the morning of Friday July 20, 1928, the crew of an RAF aircraft took photographs over the site of the Roman town of Venta Icenorum at Caistor St Edmund in Norfolk, a site which now lies in open fields to the south of Norwich.
The exceptionally dry summer meant that details of the Roman town were clearly revealed as parched lines in the barley. The pictures appeared on the front page of The Times on March 4, 1929 and caused a sensation.
Now, new investigations at Caistor Roman town using the latest technology have revealed the plan of the buried town at an extraordinary level of detail which has never been seen before. The high-resolution geophysical survey used a Caesium Vapour magnetometer to map buried remains across the entire walled area of the Roman town.
The research at Caistor is being directed by Dr Will Bowden of The University of Nottingham, who worked with Dr David Bescoby and Dr Neil Chroston of the University of East Anglia on the new survey, sponsored by the British Academy. Around 30 local volunteer members of the Caistor Roman Town Project also assisted.
The survey has produced the clearest plan of the town yet seen confirming the street plan (shown by previous aerial photographs), the town's water supply system (detecting the iron collars connecting wooden water pipes), and the series of public buildings including the baths, temples and forum, known from earlier excavations.
However, the survey also showed that earlier interpretations of the town as a densely occupied urban area — given by reconstruction paintings — may be totally wrong. Buildings were clustered along the main streets of the town, but other areas within the street grid seem to have been empty and were perhaps used for grazing or cultivation.
Dr Bowden, a lecturer in Roman Archaeology, said: "The results of the survey have far exceeded our expectations. It's not an exaggeration to say that the survey has advanced our knowledge of Caistor to the same extent that the first aerial photograph did 80 years ago.
“The presence of possible Iron Age and Saxon features suggests that the town had a much longer life than we previously thought and the fact that it's just sitting there in open fields instead of being under a modern town means we can ask the questions we want to.
“For an archaeologist it's a dream opportunity to really examine how European towns developed."
A new Roman theatre?
One of the most exciting new discoveries from the survey is what looks like a Roman theatre. Clear traces of a large semi-circular building have been found next to the town's temples — the typical location for a theatre in Roman Britain.
David Gurney, Principal Archaeologist of Norfolk Museums & Archaeology Service, said: “This is a fantastic discovery, and it goes to show that Caistor Roman town still has a great number of secrets to be disclosed in the years ahead through surveys or excavations.
“The town is already well-established as the most important Roman site in northern East Anglia, but the presence of a theatre is a significant indicator of the town's status, and of the cultural facilities available to its inhabitants.
“It is brilliant that the project has located such an important feature so early on, and this is probably just the first of many discoveries that will completely change our understanding of the town as a result of the Caistor Project.”
Matthew Martin, Chairman of the Norfolk Archaeological Trust, which owns the Roman town, said: "We are delighted with all the work which Dr Bowden and his team are carrying out at Caistor. We are very excited not only by what has been discovered so far by the use of this new technology but by the possibilities for more discoveries as further work is done.
“I think that all this is of immense interest to not only archaeologists but to a much wider public.”
Discoveries from the age of Boudica?
Caistor lies in the territory of the Iceni, the tribe of Boudica who famously rebelled against Roman rule in AD 60/61. The survey revealed numerous circular features that apparently predate the Roman town.
These are probably of prehistoric date, and suggest that Caistor was the site of a large settlement before the Roman town was built. This has always been suspected because of numerous chance finds of late Iron Age coins and metalwork, but there has never been any evidence of buildings until now.
Now the burning questions are: was Caistor built on the site of an Iceni stronghold as retribution after Boudica's rebellion, or was it built to favour a faction of the Iceni who had not taken part in the revolt?
The end of a Roman town?
Life at Roman Caistor was thought to have ended in the 5th century AD, when Britain was abandoned by the emperor of the struggling Western Roman Empire.
However, the new survey clearly shows a large ditched enclosure that cuts the surface of the Roman street in the north-west corner of the site. Possible structures are visible within this enclosure.
The earlier discovery of middle Saxon coins and metalwork outside the west wall of the site, combined with the presence of two early Saxon cemeteries in the vicinity suggests that these enclosures may be associated with continued life in the town after the Roman period.
The new research has demonstrated that Caistor is a site of international importance.
Rather than simply being a provincial Roman town, Caistor may represent the development of a major settlement from the Iron Age until the 9th century AD. Crucially, however, the site was ultimately superseded by medieval Norwich and reverted to green fields.
This is quite unlike other Roman towns that have the same long occupation sequence which now lie buried beneath the modern towns of Britain and Europe.
This fortunate change of settlement location means that these same green fields at Caistor are a unique time-capsule that could give us vital clues to the complex processes through which our towns and cities developed. Funding is now being sought to test the results of the survey through excavation.
More details of the site are available at: www.south-norfolk.gov.uk/venta
Everyone knows this stuff comes from outerspace.
Aerial photograph showing Caistor Roman Town from the south. The streets are clearly visible as marks in the grass, from the air. © Mike Page.
Reconstruction of how Caistor Roman Town may have looked in the 4th century AD, showing the settlement's temple. © Daniel Voisey.
Must have been Union survey crews.
thanks for post
Now THAT is kewl!!
|
|
|||
Gods |
Thanks Blam. |
||
|
· Mirabilis · Texas AM Anthropology News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · · History or Science & Nature Podcasts · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists · |
|||
If they were to drill this site, could they possibly strike caistor oil?
you’re joking, right?
Crop marks as a method of detecting previous underlying structures is well-established. Once it is established that something is a roman town, then it is a matter of working out what structures are post-roman and what various things may be.
Boo!
Why did I think of Family Feud when I read this title? :0(
That’s very true; if there was an economic reason for a town in the past, often that reason remains, and as long as it does, there will be a town there.
Archaeologist’s dig reveals solution to ancient riddle of lost Roman town
Telegraph Online | Sunday 30 July 2000 | Adam Lusher
Posted on 07/30/2004 10:47:49 AM EDT by SunkenCiv
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1181721/posts
Roman roads in Britain
Channel 4 | before 2004 | staff
Posted on 10/16/2004 8:46:24 PM EDT by SunkenCiv
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1247442/posts
better if there weren’t, sometimes...
Spain destroys lost Roman city for a car park
The Sunday Times | April 30, 2006 | Jon Clarke
Posted on 04/30/2006 7:38:05 PM EDT by gd124
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1624316/posts
A happy circumstance that has left us with another glimpse at Roman Britain.
Now the burning questions are: was Caistor built on the site of an Iceni stronghold as retribution after Boudica’s rebellion, or was it built to favour a faction of the Iceni who had not taken part in the revolt?
Life at Roman Caistor was thought to have ended in the 5th century AD,...However, the new survey clearly shows a large ditched enclosure that cuts the surface of the Roman street in the north-west corner of the site.”
A more probable explanation for a town that was apparently abandoned might be that it was attacked and conquered by Boudica and the rebellious Iceni. The ditched enclosure on one part of the town would have been a typical Roman defensive measure taken by the townsmen who were probably vets from the Roman army.
Not unusual for a sacked town to be abandoned afterward by the surviving or returning Romans and ignored by the remaining Saxon Iceni.
The Iceni were wiped out (so were a lot of others) in the Roman response to the revolt, and the town antedates all that, and then went on for centuries thereafter. :’)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
