Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Excavations In Iran Unravel Mystery Of 'Red Snake'
Science Daily ^ | 2-19-2008 | University of Edinburgh.

Posted on 02/19/2008 3:02:57 PM PST by blam

Excavations In Iran Unravel Mystery Of 'Red Snake'

ScienceDaily (Feb. 18, 2008) — New discoveries unearthed at an ancient frontier wall in Iran provide compelling evidence that the Persians matched the Romans for military might and engineering prowess.

The 'Great Wall of Gorgan'in north-eastern Iran, a barrier of awesome scale and sophistication, including over 30 military forts, an aqueduct, and water channels along its route, is being explored by an international team of archaeologists from Iran and the Universities of Edinburgh and Durham. This vast Wall-also known as the 'Red Snake'-is more than 1000 years older than the Great Wall of China, and longer than Hadrian's Wall and the Antonine Wall put together.

Until recently, nobody knew who had built the Wall. Theories ranged from Alexander the Great, in the 4th century BC, to the Persian king Khusrau I in the 6th century AD. Most scholars favoured a 2nd or 1st century BC construction. Scientific dating has now shown that the Wall was built in the 5th, or possibly, 6th century AD, by the Sasanian Persians. This Persian dynasty has created one of the most powerful empires in the ancient world, centred on Iran, and stretching from modern Iraq to southern Russia, Central Asia and Pakistan.

Modern survey techniques and satellite images have revealed that the forts were densely occupied with military style barrack blocks. Numerous finds discovered during the latest excavations indicate that the frontier bustled with life. Researchers estimate that some 30,000 soldiers could have been stationed at this Wall alone. It is thought that the 'Red Snake'was a defence system against the White Huns, who lived in Central Asia.

Eberhard Sauer, of the University of Edinburgh's School of History, Classics and Archaeology, said: “Our project challenges the traditional Euro-centric world view. At the time, when the Western Roman Empire was collapsing and even the Eastern Roman Empire was under great external pressure, the Sasanian Persian Empire mustered the manpower to build and garrison a monument of greater scale than anything comparable in the west. The Persians seem to match, or more than match, their late Roman rivals in army strength, organisational skills, engineering and water management.”

The research is published in the new edition of Current World Archaeology and the periodical Iran, Journal of the British Institute of Persian Studies 45.

Adapted from materials provided by University of Edinburgh.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: antoninewall; excavations; gaskridge; germanlimes; godsgravesglyphs; hadrianswall; iran; persia; persianempire; redsnake; romanempire; scotland; scotlandyet; wall
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

1 posted on 02/19/2008 3:03:00 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
GGG Ping>


2 posted on 02/19/2008 3:05:30 PM PST by blam (Secure the border and enforce the law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

3 posted on 02/19/2008 3:07:01 PM PST by blam (Secure the border and enforce the law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam

That may have been so, then. But they are still living in those days. They haven’t come far from that time period.


4 posted on 02/19/2008 3:07:24 PM PST by Bruinator (It's the Media.............Stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

The Romans warred on and off for centuries with the Persians. The Persians gave as good as they got and the Romans never managed to defeat them. The Persians might have been a real challenge to Roman domination in the region but they practiced a kind of fuedalism that kept them fighting one another more often than they did their neighbors. They could unite to fight off the Romans but once they managed that they went back to going at each other.


5 posted on 02/19/2008 3:10:57 PM PST by scory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bruinator

“The Persians seem to match, or more than match, their late Roman rivals”
Today, they are living under the boots of muslim dictators!


6 posted on 02/19/2008 3:12:29 PM PST by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ("Don't touch that thing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blam
History of Gorgân
(Numerous Pictures)


7 posted on 02/19/2008 3:15:14 PM PST by blam (Secure the border and enforce the law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: scory
To me the Persian Empire was fascinating and the Persian Kings were more benevolent than is popularly thought. On the other hand, the Greeks and Macedonians showed them to be pretty poor fighters.

Ever heard of Marathon, Plataea, Thermopylae, Issus, Granicus?

8 posted on 02/19/2008 3:23:38 PM PST by yarddog (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: blam; Bruinator; Dr. Bogus Pachysandra

This was apparently the pre-islam Persian empire. Islam halted the advancement somehow. How and why that occured is the question that needs an answer.


9 posted on 02/19/2008 3:40:23 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Turning the general election into a second Democrat primary is not a winning strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
This vast Wall-also known as the 'Red Snake'-is more than 1000 years older than the Great Wall of China

Actually, parts of the Great Wall were built about the same time as this one, although what one thinks of as the wall today was completed about a 1000 years later.

10 posted on 02/19/2008 4:06:02 PM PST by VanShuyten ("Ah! but it was something to have at least a choice of nightmares.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

I’m sure this all very encouraging for Iranians - as long they don’t think too closely about what it says regarding their culture’s long degenerate slide for the last few thousand years...


11 posted on 02/19/2008 4:07:54 PM PST by Redbob (WWJBD: "What Would Jack Bauer Do?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VanShuyten

And portions of the Great Wall were actually built 6-700 years before the Persian one.


12 posted on 02/19/2008 4:08:15 PM PST by VanShuyten ("Ah! but it was something to have at least a choice of nightmares.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: blam

Hadrian: 76-138 AD Red Snake built sometime between 400 & 599 AD

I would hope, that with 300-500 years to study Roman methods, the Persians could ‘exceed’ their accomplishments!

Unfortunately, like 20th Century Frenchmen, they built their wall to fight the last war, instead of the next one: The Muslims attacked along a different front.


13 posted on 02/19/2008 4:31:04 PM PST by ApplegateRanch (If Liberalism doesn't kill me, I'll live 'till I die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam; StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 1ofmanyfree; 24Karet; 3AngelaD; 49th; ...

· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic ·

 
Gods
Graves
Glyphs
Thanks Blam.
the 5th, or possibly, 6th century AD
It's amazing that ancient construction of a such frontier walls comes off as such a huge surprise. It wasn't rocket science to build walls. One advantage the Persians had was that parts of the empire were so harsh that they weren't practical as invasion routes. :')

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list.
GGG managers are Blam, StayAt HomeMother, and Ernest_at_the_Beach
 

· Google · Archaeologica · ArchaeoBlog · Archaeology magazine · Biblical Archaeology Society ·
· Mirabilis · Texas AM Anthropology News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo ·
· History or Science & Nature Podcasts · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists ·


14 posted on 02/19/2008 10:25:03 PM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/___________________Profile updated Tuesday, February 19, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scory

:’) Under Trajan, the Romans did kick the Persians out of Mesopotamia, but big T died at the end of that campaign, and his successor Hadrian abandoned it almost immediately. Perhaps the best chance the Romans had of conquering Persia was following Pompey’s campaign in Asia Minor, but that was made impossible by the Senate. Years later Marc Antony started on such a Parthian campaign, but from the sound of it must have spent most of the money on booze, and that fell apart.


15 posted on 02/19/2008 10:40:24 PM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/___________________Profile updated Tuesday, February 19, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: yarddog

:’) The Persians were benevolent after they got done kicking the hell out of everyone they felt like conquering. In that, they took the same approach as successful conquerors throughout history, including Alexander the Great, the Romans, and the colonial powers of Europe. They had a foothold in Europe, but never could whelm the Greek mainland or the Scythians, whom they chased all over until winter approached and the Persians had to run for it. I’ve often wondered that Napoleon didn’t learn from that, and the Germans (twice) in the 20th century.


16 posted on 02/19/2008 10:45:04 PM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/___________________Profile updated Tuesday, February 19, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
SASANIANS. LINK

Ardashir I's son Shapur I (241–272) whose his mother was daughter of a Parthian monarch, possibly Ardavan IV or one of the members of Suren-Pahlav Clan, continued this expansion, conquering Bactria and Kushan, while leading several campaigns against Rome. Penetrating deep into Eastern-Roman territory, Shapur I conquered Antiochia (253 or 256) and finally defeated the Roman emperors Gordian III (238–244), Philip the Arab (244–249), and Valerian (253–260). The latter was taken (259) into captivity after the Battle of Edessa, a tremendous and hitherto unknown disgrace for the Romans. Shapur I celebrated his victory by carving the impressive rock reliefs in Naqsh-e Rostam.

Relief of Shapur I at Naqsh-e Rostam, showing the two defeated Roma Emperors, Valerian and Philip the Arab

----------------

The abrupt fall of Sasanian Empire was completed in a period of five years, and most of its territory was absorbed into the Islamic caliphate; however many Iranian cities resisted and fought against the invaders several times. Cities such as Ray, Isfahan and Hamadan were exterminated thrice by Islamic caliphates in order to suppress revolts and to terrify Iranian people. The local population either willingly accepted Islam, thus escaping from various restrictions imposed on non-Muslims, including the requirement to pay a special poll tax (jizya), or were forced to convert by the invading armies. Invaders destroyed the Academy of Gundishapur and its library, burning piles of books. Most Sasanian records and literary works were destroyed. A few that escaped this fate were later translated into Arabic and later to Modern Persian. During the Islamic invasion many Iranian cities were destroyed or deserted, palaces and bridges were ruined and many magnificent imperial Persian gardens were burned to the ground...

17 posted on 02/20/2008 1:34:24 AM PST by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
This was apparently the pre-islam Persian empire. Islam halted the advancement somehow.

islam destroys pretty much anything it touches.

18 posted on 02/20/2008 7:46:31 AM PST by null and void (Don’t panic, they have the news under control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
See Winston Churchill on Islam
19 posted on 02/20/2008 7:49:43 AM PST by null and void (Don’t panic, they have the news under control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Yeah, the region would have been almost impossible to hold even if the Romans had taken it. Too far and people too fractious. Besides it fell outside the “natural” boundaries of the empire which were centered on the Mediterranean (did I spell that right?). I have read that Augustus understood this and made it policy that while there were Roman interests in the region there would be no real effort to conquer farther east.


20 posted on 02/20/2008 8:30:27 AM PST by scory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson