Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Want a federal bailout? Why not bankruptcy, too? (Dodd may support bankruptcy for GM)
AP ^

Posted on 11/19/2008 7:21:14 PM PST by mathwhizz

"I'm very much attracted to the prepackaged bankruptcy idea," said Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., who held auto bailout hearings Tuesday as chairman of the Senate banking committee. He was referring to a method of seeking Chapter 11 protection whereby a company would negotiate plans with creditors before filing for bankruptcy, thus speeding up the process.

"I believe their best option would be some type of Chapter 11 bankruptcy, where they can renegotiate — get rid of the management," the banking committee's ranking Republican, Richard Shelby of Alabama, said Wednesday on CBS' "Early Show.

(Excerpt) Read more at google.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
This is surprising coming from Dodd.

But it is what has to happen for GM, Ford, and Chrysler to survive. They have to go bankrupt and throw the UAW under the bus. Unless they break the back of the unions suffocating them and develop a cost structure competitive to toyota and honda, they will cease to exist unless nationalized by Obama and the communists as some sort of welfare job program.

1 posted on 11/19/2008 7:21:14 PM PST by mathwhizz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mathwhizz

Note, no mention of union concessions.


2 posted on 11/19/2008 7:25:37 PM PST by Fred (The Democrat Party is the Nadir of Nihilism and BO is a WHINING marxist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fred

Who is going to “get rid of management” in a chapter 11. It is management that goes into chapter 11, it is management that negotiates it, and oversees it. Dick Fuld is still CEO of Lehman.

Oh, yeah, Lehaman. That worked out great. Let’s do another, only 10 times as big! Now is great timing because we are already in horrible financial shape. Let’s kick the economy all the way into the gutter and stomp on it until its unconscious!

That’s creative destruction baby! Yee-ha!


3 posted on 11/19/2008 7:28:16 PM PST by Jack Black (NO MANDATORY SERVICE IN THE OBAMA-YOUTH !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mathwhizz
"I'm very much attracted to the prepackaged bankruptcy idea," said Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn.

Huh??? GM to go bankrupt and then we bail them out??? How does that help drive down union costs, pension costs, supplier costs?

Stop it! This is silly!

4 posted on 11/19/2008 7:28:27 PM PST by mlocher (USA is a sovereign nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathwhizz
Look at little Chrissy Wissy....he knows he is gonna get busted for taking favors from country wide and others. He's no better than his old man. LMAO!!!
5 posted on 11/19/2008 7:29:27 PM PST by katiekins1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathwhizz

Enough of this. They won’t survive; no way, no how. Pieces of the companies may be purchased just like the banking operations of WAMU were bought, but the companies themselves are done.

Would you buy a Chevy once GM has declared bankruptcy? Chevrolet and the other GM plates have been bleeding share for too long. A buyer may come in to purchase the production capacity, but that is about it.

GM, Ford, and Chrysler are dead. It is time to bury the carcasses.


6 posted on 11/19/2008 7:32:37 PM PST by beancounter13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathwhizz

Please just let them die so new, more responsible companies can come in and grow. This is no different than the airlines. They should have died too.

Bad. Companies. Must. Die.


7 posted on 11/19/2008 7:33:00 PM PST by Bull Market (The Neo-Con experiment failed. John McCain deserved to lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bull Market

I saw Romney on tonight saying the companies need to declare bankruptcy and reorganize. Then I saw a clip of our friend “Barney” saying we need to bail them all out...
it was on B O’Reilly, then Bill let Barney have it big time.
One thing Bill O. is good at is giving it to Barney Frank.


8 posted on 11/19/2008 7:45:39 PM PST by ohiogrammy (12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mathwhizz

I fear rats bearing gifts. The rat idea of a managed bankruptcy is a UAW bailout with rats gaining control of the US auto industry. Say hello to the new rat CEOs, Barney and Chris, guided by their UAW masters.


9 posted on 11/19/2008 7:51:39 PM PST by businessprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathwhizz

You’ll hear the MSM pronouncing how the gov’t loans saved Chrysler under Iococca. For those who remember, the gov’t held warrants at $9+ for lots of Chrysler stock. When Iococca went to pay off the debt early, part of the deal was that the gov’t give back the warrants. I recall Chuck U Schumer not being so warm toward that deal, because the gov’t could have made tons of money by exercising warrants when Chrysler stock was above $20/share. The warrants would have ruined the run up. But the gov’t gave in.

The situation is still the same - car companies basically blackmailing the gov’t by threatening to put millions on unemployment conpensation, which even with a bailout now, that scenario is still in the future - ie. money down the drain. Iococca did the same with England when he ran Ford there, way back when. His ‘executive ability’ was way overrated.


10 posted on 11/19/2008 7:54:09 PM PST by Kent C
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ohiogrammy

...and Barney’s good at TAKING it...hehehe...!!!


11 posted on 11/19/2008 7:54:14 PM PST by mozarky2 (Ya never stand so tall as when ya stoop to stomp a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: beancounter13
A buyer may come in to purchase the production capacity, but that is about it.

Alla youa factory are berong to us! We buy wif Warmalt dorrar!

Next, we get youa house!

12 posted on 11/19/2008 7:58:22 PM PST by stboz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mlocher

“Huh??? GM to go bankrupt and then we bail them out??? How does that help drive down union costs, pension costs, supplier costs?”

This could prove the best way to go.

A bailout withOUT bankruptcy would be business as usual for the companies AND the unions, continuing right down the road to ruin.

Bankruptcy by itself might result in credit problems for the automakers, because even after restructuring, they might not be able to raise sufficient cash (through wary financial institutions) with which to continue in business.

However, if, after bankruptcy, the government would be willing to indemnify lenders to the automakers, they could then restructure (with renogiated union contracts) AND be able to find the necessary cash from banks who wouldn’t fear of losing their loan money....

I detest Dodd (from my own state), but perhaps he’s actually right on this....

- John


13 posted on 11/19/2008 8:07:01 PM PST by Fishrrman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kent C

I am less worried about the unemployment insurance than I am about the costs that might fall on the PBGC (pension benefit guarantee corp, a federal entity that doesn’t need deep pockets because it just reaches into ours)


14 posted on 11/19/2008 8:08:10 PM PST by MainFrame65 (The US Senate: World's greatest PREVARICATIVE body!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MainFrame65

Do you have any estimate of the liabilities that the pension plans of GM and Ford have? It is hard to imagine that the liabilities are higher than the $25 billion that the companies are seeking. I am against any bailout, but especially one that is way more than the companies can ever hope to pay back in order to fund a pension plan and hourly wages for a work force that is among the least efficient in America.


15 posted on 11/19/2008 10:49:21 PM PST by Defiant (I for one welcome our new Obama Overlords.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MainFrame65
...the costs that might fall on the PBGC (pension benefit guarantee corp, a federal entity that doesn’t need deep pockets because it just reaches into ours)

No worry, that will be rolled into Social Security like our 401k's :-)

16 posted on 11/20/2008 12:20:07 AM PST by Kent C
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson