Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GodGunsGuts

Or evidence that tissue can survive longer than we thought under the right conditions.


4 posted on 04/30/2009 7:02:29 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: tacticalogic

recently near where I live there was a dinosaur fossil discovery, I noticed the strata it was found in, and the type of SOIL surrounding the fossils, found in place (i.e. not distributed by natural processes).

There is no way that the matrix surrounding the fossils was millions of years old, as it was top-soil, with still visible organic matter just a few feet from the fossils (they ware about 4 foot down, exposed as in a wash).

The way science works is that until you have overwhelming evidence (not just her and there), the coventional theory is still king.

The evidence however, is piling up. It’s easier to explain young earth and massive, punctuated sudden changes in the environment to produce the fossil beds than millions of years of slow change. Each side needs creative explanations for some observations, but they are far less outlandish on the relatively young earth side.

Frankly, do you REALLY believe tissue is viable after 80 MILLION YEARS?

If so, please name the “right conditions” I can use to preserve any flesh for 80 million years. Imagine the egyptian mummies after 1 million.....DUST.


7 posted on 04/30/2009 7:31:29 PM PDT by BereanBrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: tacticalogic

recently near where I live there was a dinosaur fossil discovery, I noticed the strata it was found in, and the type of SOIL surrounding the fossils, found in place (i.e. not distributed by natural processes).

There is no way that the matrix surrounding the fossils was millions of years old, as it was top-soil, with still visible organic matter just a few feet from the fossils (they ware about 4 foot down, exposed as in a wash).

The way science works is that until you have overwhelming evidence (not just her and there), the coventional theory is still king.

The evidence however, is piling up. It’s easier to explain young earth and massive, punctuated sudden changes in the environment to produce the fossil beds than millions of years of slow change. Each side needs creative explanations for some observations, but they are far less outlandish on the relatively young earth side.

Frankly, do you REALLY believe tissue is viable after 80 MILLION YEARS?

If so, please name the “right conditions” I can use to preserve any flesh for 80 million years. Imagine the egyptian mummies after 1 million.....DUST.


8 posted on 04/30/2009 7:31:45 PM PDT by BereanBrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: tacticalogic

Tastes like chicken.


13 posted on 04/30/2009 7:47:05 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: tacticalogic

Now, if some clever scientist can extract DNA we will be on our way to Jurassic Park III.


25 posted on 04/30/2009 8:09:10 PM PDT by pankot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson