[GodGunsGuts]

Ping!

[xcamel]

Stolen from:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2289978/posts
and
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/06/090621143315.htm

And completely perverted, as you usually do to anything scientific.

[trumandogz]

For instance, mainstream science believes that coal, diamonds, and oil require vast amounts of time to develop, when they in fact can form in under a year.

ROTFLMAO!!! I mean, that is not just a little funny but really hilarious. These people should be writing comedy for TV.

[Morgan in Denver]

You might want to see this. It presents a much different picture than the statists want us to believe.

[Nathan Zachary]

One of the best, and likely closest to the truth theories ever:

Fountains of the deep

[Tarpon]

Methane has been discovered on planets and moons in our solar system where dinos never walked ...

[SkyDancer]

I’ve always asked - what melted them? Neanderthal fires? Stone SUV’s??? Fire pits in the Seattle parks (Ok, Seattle wasn’t around then but Mayor Idiot Nickles banned them because of contributing to global warming, or, climate change)

[Moonman62]

Glaciers Can Melt in a 'Geologic Instant'

Does this mean that creationists now accept the geologic time scale?

[Pale]

Honest question: Supposedly the prevalence of flood myths in the origins stories of cultures worldwide can be attributed to the same biblical flood, yes? But a global ice age within the period of recorded history merits nary a mention in the Bible?

Hmmmm....

[SunkenCiv]

:') Thanks xcamel. I like to make my own fun at times. ;') But I'm leavin' now...

[count-your-change]

I’ve never heard of anyone wanting to see how quickly they could make coal, easier to just buy a few lumps, but making diamonds in a very short time is nothing unusual.
General Electric started doing it over fifty years ago and tons and tons of diamonds are turned out every year, not millions of years.
And a goodly quantity of other gem stones too.

[count-your-change]

This Thread is Alive With the Sound of Mule-ish,
The Braying Chorus has arrived from the Hills!

[ElectricStrawberry]

More nonsense and shamelessly false conclusions from Brian Thomas *MS.

[Stultis]

(Ooops, there goes another evolutionary ASSUMPTION)

Um, yeah. Now 'splain to me, how exactly does the geological (and historical geological) significance of glaciers and ice ages represent an "evolutionary" assumption when this was all initially elucidated by the CREATIONIST, vociferous ANTIEVOLUTIONIST and adamant Darwin CRITIC, Louis Agassiz?

And even if Agassiz hadn't been a creationist, and hadn't been an antievolutionist, and hadn't been one of Darwin's scientific critics, how would he have based his glacial geology and ice age theory on "evolutionary assumptions" when he did the work in the 1830's, more than twenty years before Darwin published?

[ColdWater]

Ethical Use Policy
Nothing on our website may be reprinted or reproduced for other websites and media in whole or in part beyond these guidelines without obtaining permission from ICR. This applies to the website pages, content, graphics, audio and video, etc.

Guidelines:
1. You may print out pages in whole as evangelistic tools for churches, schools, etc. Our copyright notice and website address (© 2009 Institute for Creation Research. All Rights Reserved. http://icr.org) must be included with no exceptions.

2. You may quote up to 100 words, rephrase or summarize our information for non-commercial, educational use provided you reference our website each time our information is used.

[ColdWater]

” It is most reasonable, given the Bible’s history, that there was a single Ice Age, and that the largest extent of ice lasted for only hundreds of years, beginning around 2400 BC. “

I don’t remember the Bible mentioning an ice age. Do you?