Heads Up - Multiple COLBS Warning [someone swapped out the Kenya BC AFTER it was posted]

Various ^ | August 3, 2009 | Various

[Calpernia]

There are now modified photos of the COLB that broke here yesterday. The changes are so slight, that no one is noticing them.

The original one posted in breaking news:

One of the modified ones:

The changes are so subtle, you can barely tell which one you are looking at.

This modified one is showing jokes like: The Font of the Certificate=Schmutz (A Schmutz is a chump, as in you are a chump) #5733=The number of the Certificate, is code for : "Problem with Windows REGISTRY", a sly reference to your claim that Obama does not appear on the Hawaii Live Birth Registry. 47O44=Easiest of all. BOH's age=47 0=O (if you look close you can tell that that is a Schmutz Font "Oh" not "Zero") EF Lavender is ORGANIC DISH SOAP

The original one does not say EF Lavender, it says KF Lavender. The original one shows the number is: 47,644.

[SvenMagnussen]

Source is probably Obama supporter Aston Kutcher.

[Sibre Fan]

http://www.upload.mn/view/gs5jgyylzx17ozzdc1s3.jpg

---

Uploaded Aug 5.
Proof or yet another distraction technique? Hard to tell right now (though I’ve been verry skeptical, for several reasons, including that I disagree on the “Republic of Kenya” theory and the “Bomford is a forgery” theory).

[SvenMagnussen]

It looks like the kind of hoax Aston Kutcher would pull.

http://www.upload.mn/view/eg35f93o0abil85nsa70.jpg

[Sibre Fan]

All uploaded yesterday.

As I said, I have been very skeptical, but - still - this doesn’t “prove” whether it’s proof or whether it’s just another distraction technique. Look how fast the “Kenyan BC generator got out there. It’s possible to create after the fact, no? Have to break down images to see whether true photos, or photoshopped background, and all that stuff.

[SvenMagnussen]

An actor hired by Aston Kutcher probably gave Orly the photograph of the document and the money to fly to London and Israel to check on the story. Kutcher filmed it and will probably use it on his prankster TV show.

That’s my guess.

[PA Engineer]

4) The seal at the top of the page is cut off so you can’t see it very good. This is done on purpose.

I was working on that. That has bothered me since the download. I posted earlier the two words at the bottom of the seal and I don't remember what they were. I agree. The one thing I am working on is from the original premises of my post. The Australian national requirements from the period did not specify the "mother’s maiden surname" On the "Bomford" image it is shown. On my original post we did a "Divide Scanned Photos", prior to looking at the individual sections of the document. Divide scanned photos is defined in Photoshop Elements as:

If you scanned several pictures at once on a flatbed scanner, you can automatically divide and straighten the scanned image into its component photos. The photos must have a clear separation between them.

I caught a great deal of flack from that and agreed that we are not professionals and were wrong to use it. After doing some more thinking I remembered that this was a scanned documents and the sections that separated were odd for a single element to have produced. My daughter went through numerous pictures both edited and unedited. Only the edited JPGs behaved the same way.

Trueamericas post 218 on Thread Kenyan document ignites firestorm over authenticity (Let's Discuss Bomford HERE) found the document had been scanned with a Lead Technologies scanner as evidenced in the first line of the document file.

My thoughts immediately went back to this image from the document line with "Mother's former married surname". Plummz commented on this on thread Sample birth certificates from Australia, and other Commonwealth nations. Replying to a table at post 25 from Raycpa at post 28:

According to that chart, the Bomford cert should NOT have his mother’s maiden surname on it...

but it does.

The section he is referring to I have inverted, cropped and marked up as follows:



The original Layer 4 from Divide Scanned Photos is as follows:



My conclusions are as follows:

1. Divide Scanned Photos did bring out an anomali from JPG files that have been altered.

2. The Layer 4 image was added to the document or altered for some reason.

3. The Layer 4 does not appear monospaced, nor is the text the same size.

4. Pixelation is different from the remainder of the text in the field.

5. Text alignment is different across the field

Freeper comments are welome.

[Houghton M.]

Take a look at

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2308435/posts?page=649#649

This seems to me to be the stake through the heart of the Taitz document. The Bomford forger (and it is forged) did use registry book numbers that seem to be authentic. Even if the Bomford is a fake, even if it were made after the Taitz document was posted, the Taitz document uses South Australian birth registry book reference numbers.

[Cardhu]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2309777/posts

[blue99]

Obama Kenyan B.C. forger reveals what he used to create the fake document,

http://www.upload.mn/view/2vu1mtqgb7obp3yym18l.jpg

[blue99]

Obama Kenyan B.C. forger reveals what he used to create the fake document,

http://www.upload.mn/view/2vu1mtqgb7obp3yym18l.jpg

[Houghton M.]

And andesag2000 at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2308435/posts?page=649#649

is probably the same guy or part of the same group-he is a DU troll, revealing another part of the method by which they created the Taitz document?

[JewishRighter]

OMG!!! I mean, we all considered the possibility that it was forged, but to have it so well demonstrated (unless that picture is a forgery?!!!???), is really stunning. Never thought someone would cop to it.

Can anyone tell who the poster is? Is there a crime to prosecute?

[PA Engineer]

It wasn't just possible to obtain such a document having been born outside the country, it was actually quite easy. All it would take was the word of one parent. The secondary evidence they point to are newspaper birth announcements. And how were these generated? They were generated by public health departments who distributed them to newspapers whenever a certification of live birth was issued. So that is no evidence whatsoever.

This is why I am sticking with this until I complete my review and summarize the results and those of the Kenya & Australia threads.

If a long form appears, we will have reviewed all the timeline facts to determine the efficacy of it. Maybe the Kenya document indeed will force the judges hand to this end. Whether any of the documents are real will become academic. The purpose is to force the hand for the release of all O background documents.

[JewishRighter]

How did you find that?

[PA Engineer]

Thanks for the link. I quess the judge will have to decide via discovery.

[JewishRighter]

Look here:

http://www.upload.mn/view/gs5jgyylzx17ozzdc1s3.jpg&random=normal

[PA Engineer]

That would explain the links back to FR through the astroturf blog "Technical Editor" posted from. Paging Technical Editor. Could you explain to all the Freepers who spent many hours investigating and analyzing this.

I am trying to figure out where the line is drawn between "Jokester" and "criminal fraud".

[PA Engineer]

How did you find that?

Good question.

[PA Engineer]

Saved and Archived.