[GeronL]

do we really need to see the term ‘dino’s mounting’...

[GraceG]

Let’s clone them back into existence and raise them in PeTA non-approved confinement conditions.

I for one would love a bucket of Kentucky Fried T-rex.

Mmmmmm, Sweet tasty Dino meat! That is what the Dino deserve for eating humans when they were around before the great flood.

[GodGunsGuts]

Be sure to check out the link ref #2 in the ref. section of the article. If anybody can find more such links, be sure to PM or ping me with the links!

All the best—GGG

[ari-freedom]

I used to believe the universe was billions of years old 9big bang, etc) but the discovery of soft tissues in dinosaur fossils was the catalyst that led me to re-evaluate everything.

[Slump Tester]

Dinos mounting?

That sounds like Andy Rooney and Helen Thomas.

Ewww!

[RaiderRose]

Extremely fascinating! Thanks for posting.

[LiteKeeper]

SITREP

[onedoug]

Phooey.

[April Lexington]

The dinosaurs died in the flood a few thousand years ago. This “fresh meat” proves it. Nothing millions of years old would be soft and squishy. More lies from the Leftist controlled Universities. Evolution is nonsense and the world is approximately 10,000 years old. Period.

[jonno]

Dino-bump.

Thanks for the post.

[ColdWater]

The deeper question is “What happened to the saddle”?

[Ha Ha Thats Very Logical]

More Brian Thomas BS. These days I mostly just pick out a couple of examples of how he practices to deceive. For example:

- He writes, “Either the vast evolutionary ages assigned to these finds are dramatically erroneous, or ‘we really don’t understand decay’ rates of the soft tissues and proteins.” But if you follow his reference, there’s no indication the person he’s quoting is talking about decay rates. The sentence in full is “Schweitzer’s work is ‘showing us we really don’t understand decay,’ Holtz says.” But Brian needs him to mean decay rates, so Brian will put those words in his mouth.

- He writes, “soft, squishy tissues have been discovered inside fossilized dinosaur bones.” This is the first time I’ve heard them described as “squishy” (”soft and wet...softly gurgling or splashing”). I really don’t think they’re wet enough to do any splashing.

- He writes “Paleontologists who have analyzed the tissues...insist that something is fundamentally wrong with laboratory data on biochemical decay rates” and adds a footnote. Yet his reference is to a paper by a professor of marine chemistry, not a paleontologist, and the abstract available at the reference doesn’t show any “insisting that something is fundamentally wrong.”

Face it, Brian Thomas BS is a propagandist and a deceiver. It’s a shame that you promote his work.

[ElectricStrawberry]

Title of the article is a lie.

Image in the title bar of the article is a lie.

Very first sentence is a lie.

Second sentenc e is a false conclusion based on the lie in the first sentence.

First sentence of the 2nd paragraph is a lie. OK, entire 2nd paragraph is a lie.

Do I need top continue reading yet another Brian Thomas *MS hunk-o-nonsense? Sure I do....

Every time Brian Thomas *MS adds a little personal touch with a phrase or sentence.....he shows his ignorance. Only in HIS world does everything "turn to dust"...gee Brian Thomas *MS....just because a body left in the open turns to dust, doesn't mean that all bodies turn to dust like most currently and observably do....some fall in a bog and persist for a few thousand years. Some are mummified and persist for thousands of years.

Hey Brian Thomas *MS....why didn't this guy turn to dust??????

.....and then there's the false conclusion:

Biblical data, however, not only provide the timeframe for the death of these dinosaurs in Flood deposits a few thousand years ago, but also a mode of deposition in agreement with observable data that their demise occurred when they "fell into a watery grave."

[Mom MD]

Thanks for your continued efforts in posting articles and pinging the list in the face of the name calling and belittling that inevitably happens if one dares call out the god of evolution. Your efforts are much appreciated!

[Kozak]

Right more Cretin Bullsh#t.

From one of the articles: Mummified dinosaur skin yields up new secrets

Scientists from The University of Manchester have identified preserved organic molecules in the skin of a dinosaur that died around 66-million years ago.

The team report how the fossil's soft tissues were spared from decay by fine sediments that formed a mineral cast.

A wide range of tests have shown that the fossil still holds cell-like structures, although the constituent proteins have decayed.

They believe the hippo-sized Dakota fell into a watery grave, with little oxygen present to speed along the decay process. Meanwhile, very fine sediments reacted with the soft tissues of the animal, forming a kind of cement.

As a result, the 66 million-year-old fossil still retains some of the organic matter of the original dinosaur, mixed in with the minerals.

So, the actual SCIENTISTS, have a rational explanation for the find, based on SCIENCE, not the BULLSH#T spin on it that comes from the Cretinous swamp at ICR.