Posted on 09/11/2009 2:38:51 AM PDT by Rocky
As I'm sure you know, meteorology is an inexact science due to the large number of variables involved in predicting and understanding the weather. I frequently say that weather forecasting is a humbling endeavor, and I have learned to respect its challenges. From this perspective, you might be able to better understand why I wince when hearing pronouncements such as "the science is settled", "the debate is over", or even the "the temperature in the 2050s is projected to be..." I realize that forecasting climate and weather are different, but both involve a large number of moving parts.
There are numerous reasons why I question the consensus view on human-induced climate change covered extensively on this blog by Andrew Freedman. But for this entry, I scaled them down to ten:
(Excerpt) Read more at voices.washingtonpost.com ...
Global Warming is a Hoax and a Scam. Write this 100 times on the blackboard to help de-program your mind.
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · subscribe · | ||
read
An excellent article. And well founded in REAL science.
More often then not the weather did not appear as predicted. Mom, the newspapers and the weathermen on TV were wrong, but only for the upcoming day.
Now with satellites, weather radar and predictive programming I've found that the weather predictions can extend for days so the weathermen can be wrong for longer periods of time.
there is only one solution!
This model is doing her best to Green the planet starting with the tree on her hip!
Excellent article. I’m also among the picky folks (see comments below the article) that see that Y2K is not an appropriate comparison. Y2K was a serious problem that was solved in time by throwing a lot of money at it - exactly what the global warming scam isn’t.
Starting to be impressed with the people who write for the Washington Post. Matt Rogers has showed courage standing up to leftist group-think in a city like Washington - - but no more so than the news room did when standing up to their Publisher a few months back. Hats off to a paper able to handle real diversity - diversity of thought.
LOL. I really didn’t expect any nice pictures like that on a global warming thread. Thanks.
I like Trouble!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.