Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/23/2009 9:14:11 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: allmendream; UCANSEE2; metmom; DaveLoneRanger; editor-surveyor; betty boop; Alamo-Girl; MrB; ...

Ping!!!


2 posted on 09/23/2009 9:15:45 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson; dennisw; Tailgunner Joe; Thunder90

Thought you guys might be interested—GGG


3 posted on 09/23/2009 9:16:55 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts
Klinghoffer is wrong about the "spectrum" of conservatism, but it's an interesting read. This quote from Kristol is a spot-on keeper:

"So ''evolution'' is no simple established scientific orthodoxy, and to teach it as such is an exercise in dogmatism. It is reasonable to suppose that if evolution were taught more cautiously, as a conglomerate idea consisting of conflicting hypotheses rather than as an unchallengeable certainty, it would be far less controversial. As things now stand, the religious fundamentalists are not far off the mark when they assert that evolution, as generally taught, has an unwarranted anti-religious edge to it."

jw

4 posted on 09/23/2009 9:22:02 AM PDT by JWinNC (www.anailinhisplace.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts

Darwin was a quack.

Kristol was ok, though.


6 posted on 09/23/2009 9:30:58 AM PDT by Retired Greyhound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson