[MNDude]

Unlike Jurrasiac Park shows, there is no Dino DNA. It’s all been decayed or fossilized over time.

[GodGunsGuts]

Ping!

[GodGunsGuts]

Thought you might be interested in this one.

All the best—GGG

[the_Watchman]

Whenever any kind of evidence is concealed, one immediately questions the spoliators' motives for doing so. The intuitive answer is that they dislike what the information would reveal. Therefore, to spoliate evidence suggests that the spoliators' argument or theory would be weakened, or embarrassed, by that evidence. This suggestion is so strong, forensically speaking, that it is treated as a rule of presumptive inference in law courts. In other words, if someone hides evidence in this way, the law presumes that the hidden evidence was damaging to the argument of the spoliator. The spoliator then bears the burden of proof to show otherwise.6

An interesting legal argument from this article which bears directly on the case of the birthers.

[CottShop]

I read this this morning- just like hte 98% ‘similarity’ claim between chimp and human genome- the comparisons between dino and chicken protiens was HAND PICKED- ignoring evidnece that didn’t fit so that they could come to a biased conclusion- Funny hting is though that the results put the dinos more ‘similar’ to Amphibians than to chikens or Ostriches- but don’t let’s let the facts get in the way of a good story, as TV shows and news articles were very quick to tout the ‘dino-bird connection’- again, foisting a complete LIE on our kids- they KNEW they were printing a lie- but they went ahead and printed it anyways- and these evos have the gall to claim Creationists have an ‘agenda’?

[BushCountry]

RULE OF 48...

[count-your-change]

Woodward’s paper on the dino bone dna can be found here:

DISP: Bioinformatics LabDINO DNA sequence in the BLAST web form and “BLAST” it. We will use all the default settings, so just press the format button. ...
myweb.dal.ca/js551958/Tutorial/Lab2.html

Well worth reading!