Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DNA study shows that Celts are not a unique genetic group
BBC ^ | 3/18/15 | Pallab Ghosh

Posted on 03/19/2015 8:39:02 AM PDT by ek_hornbeck

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last
To: ek_hornbeck
Celts were all over Europe. Even in (Germanic) Anglo-Saxon England, it was found that there are a lot more Celts than people expected.

You also had the Picts in Scotland, Vikings everywhere (Germanic), Normans (which were also Vikings), and there were probably others before the Celts.

Migrations were the order of the day back to pre-Roman times.

21 posted on 03/19/2015 9:41:09 AM PDT by Darren McCarty (Mike Pence in 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ek_hornbeck

bookmark


22 posted on 03/19/2015 9:43:47 AM PDT by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Roman_War_Criminal

The Greek population was basically replaced by Slavs, like the rest of Eastern Europe, so I’ve read. Most of this mass migration of Germanics and Indo-Europeans occurred around the time of Rome’s fall, probably contributing quite a bit to it. The Huns are a notable example, but by no means the only one. Ostrogoths, Visigoths, Vandals, Lombards, a slew of others.


23 posted on 03/19/2015 9:45:32 AM PDT by Telepathic Intruder (The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: baltimorepoet

I believe the Basques are closely related to the Celts. A lot of the Spaniards are also Germanics (Visagoths). Probably a mix of Celts and Visagoths.


24 posted on 03/19/2015 9:47:21 AM PDT by Darren McCarty (Mike Pence in 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Burma, Rhodesia... country names often change as regimes change. I have no idea where “Zimbabwe” comes from. Don’t care either.


25 posted on 03/19/2015 9:49:15 AM PDT by Telepathic Intruder (The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Darren McCarty
I believe the Basques are closely related to the Celts. A lot of the Spaniards are also Germanics (Visagoths). Probably a mix of Celts and Visagoths.

I thought that the Basques spoke a non-Indo-European language, while Celtic languages are Indo-European? Of course, as this study shows, language groups don't always equal genetic groups, so you may be right.

26 posted on 03/19/2015 9:51:29 AM PDT by ek_hornbeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Telepathic Intruder

IIRC, irani, like aryani is a word that goes back to ancient Indo-European before the Persian/Sanskrit split. Iran as a name for the people goes way back, although pars,persia,farsi,etc. are also seen.


27 posted on 03/19/2015 9:56:27 AM PDT by epluribus_2 (he had the best mm - ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ek_hornbeck

Good old Alfred the Great.


28 posted on 03/19/2015 9:57:00 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darren McCarty

Thing about it is, the Celts are not really a genetic group but a cultural group, and cultural changes spread faster than genetic changes. The Celts ranged from Ireland, Britain, Spain, Gaul, Austria, and traveled as far as central Turkey, and very likely as far as China.

There have been some significant genetic changes in England, with the Germanic genetics increasing from about 10% of the population to about 50%... replacing the Celtic. Probably a result of the better food & economic resources from being the ruling ethnic group.

Some of the stuff is very telling, like the Y-chromosome heritage in Iceland being predominantly Nordic, with the X-chromosome lineage being fairly Celtic. Apparently Vikings would take some British Isles women with them on the way to colonize Iceland.


29 posted on 03/19/2015 10:00:08 AM PDT by baltimorepoet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: epluribus_2

Ah. But, so I’ve read, the name change was at least in part to appease Nazi Germany.


30 posted on 03/19/2015 10:05:11 AM PDT by Telepathic Intruder (The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ek_hornbeck

“Not surprising for Britain, which has been invaded by so many different peoples”

Sicily is more “HEINZ” 57 variety I think....Pretty certain more “strangers” have floated thru / roun there than Britain....


31 posted on 03/19/2015 10:06:17 AM PDT by litehaus (A memory tooooo long)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The Irish Republic’s first president was Eamon de Valera.

Spanish survivors of the Invincible Armada found refuge among their fellow Catholics in Ireland.


32 posted on 03/19/2015 10:37:50 AM PDT by elcid1970 ("I am a radicalized infidel. My bullets are dipped in pig grease.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: elcid1970

They must have really liked those red headed girls! ....................


33 posted on 03/19/2015 10:51:56 AM PDT by Red Badger (Man builds a ship in a bottle. God builds a universe in the palm of His hand.............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: elcid1970

de Valera was born in New York and was ethnically Irish and Spanish. He was raised in Ireland when his dad died.


34 posted on 03/19/2015 11:02:03 AM PDT by Darren McCarty (Mike Pence in 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Telepathic Intruder
The Slavic languages predominate in most of Eastern Europe, but are Slavic speakers really different? A lot of them, especially in Southeast Europe, may have more Thracian or Illyrian ancestry than Slavic--or even descend from the Neolithic populations who were there before the Indo-European-speaking tribes spread to the Balkans.

The ancient Greeks were probably a combination of the people who brought the Greek language there and the people there in Neolithic and "Early Helladic" (3rd millennium B.C.) times.

Any similarities between modern Greeks and modern Turks may arise from two things: (1) medieval Greek-speaking Christians in Asia Minor later becoming Turkish-speaking Muslims and (2) Christians of Turkey fleeing to Greece in the 1920s.

I'd be interested in seeing DNA studies of modern Greece. I would have thought it might be too sensitive a topic (as the modern Greeks would prefer to think they are 100% of Hellenic descent).

As recently as the 19th century, Albanian was widely spoken in rural areas of Greece.

35 posted on 03/19/2015 11:04:52 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ek_hornbeck

” ... language groups don’t always equal genetic groups ...”

Two related languages with little apparent genetic or cultural linkages are Finnish and Hungarian.


36 posted on 03/19/2015 11:23:02 AM PDT by riverdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ek_hornbeck
In Anthropology the Celts have never been considered an ethnic group only a cultural one, the result of cultural diffusion from central Europe. It seems plausible to me that at some ancient point in time there was an ethnic group. What does seem clear is that the British Isles Celts aren't them. The last genetic studies I saw say that the ancient Brits are related to people from the Iberian peninsula.
37 posted on 03/19/2015 11:33:13 AM PDT by Varda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus

Hah, I’ve heard that myself but I think it’s probably closer to around 5%. You don’t want to tell them that, however. As far as Indo-Europeans go, I believe a lot of them may have come from Armenia, but I don’t know. Unfortunately history was not very kind to those who stayed. They were the first to come up with iron working, I think. Asia Minor was actually a very interesting place until the Muslims formed their brutal empire and erased much of history.

There are two gaps in the mountain range that separates southern from northern Europe. The northern plains are unbroken except for the densely forested hills of Germany, which basically prevented Roman occupation. It was also the staging point for a lot of invasions, since the garden spot was close down in the Danube. My own family history occurred in the Volga, the largest basin to the north-east. Then in South Dakota due to the unfriendliness of a certain northern empire. Nasty business, that was.


38 posted on 03/19/2015 11:49:05 AM PDT by Telepathic Intruder (The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ek_hornbeck

Equally, we’re all descended from people who did the brutalizing, raping and enslaving.


39 posted on 03/19/2015 12:28:05 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Telepathic Intruder

Only if Hitler was around in 600 BC. Cyrus referred to himself as the King of Iran and non-Iran. So did his successors down to the Muslim conquest.

IOW, the natives always called their country Iran. Persia was a name given to them by their Greek enemies.


40 posted on 03/19/2015 12:34:36 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson