Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FCC Has Shocker for GOP That Could Guarantee Big Democrat Win in '16
Townhall.com ^ | June 4, 2015 | Matt Towery

Posted on 06/04/2015 9:13:07 AM PDT by Kaslin

It's not a major news story...yet. But trust me, the Democrats and the Federal Communications Commission that they control are ready to guarantee a defeat for Republicans in close U.S. Senate races in 2016 and in the battle for the White House. This is not columnist hype. It's the real thing, and it's moving like a freight train.

We all know that people hate getting those automated phone calls from politicians, creditors and vacation time-share hucksters. And rightly so. The FCC, headed by Tom Wheeler, has known that for years. But it seems they waited until now to act.

After rushing into law so-called "net neutrality" rules just recently, Wheeler and his gang are again in a hurry to regulate some more. But this time even the most politically adept Republicans may be failing to see the storm coming.

In less than a month, Wheeler's FCC will likely vote in favor of regulations that will appear to have rung a death knell to phone calls from debt collectors and pollsters. There are to be various ways for "consumers" to automatically block dialed phone calls -- including a call-blocking system that phone companies will be obliged to offer their customers.

As a man who used this technology for years as the head of a polling firm, I could easily get all worked up over the likely ruling's impact on my industry. I won't, though, because I don't head up the company anymore and because we had already moved to very accurate online surveys, anyway.

But for those supposedly superlative polls conducted by live call rooms -- so beloved by the establishment media -- they will be banned under the new rules, unless Wheeler and his Democrat-appointed majority on the FCC carve a special "niche" to keep them fat and happy.

Most opinion and news articles about this approaching decision have focused on either the end of the nuisance of automatically dialed calls, or the end of political and marketing research. But those stories miss the real and deadly aim of Wheeler and his gang.

Tom Wheeler is the FCC Commission Chair who had publicly stated his concerns about having government regulate the Internet. That is until he received not-so-vague marching orders from President Obama to reverse his direction and support the big Web-based companies who gave most of their money and manpower to Obama in 2016. (I'm not suggesting a quid pro quo; I'm just laying out the facts.)

Of course, the obvious victim is our nation's longstanding adherence to the First Amendment, which has always exempted political speech from restrictions and regulations. The pollsters will find a way to survive this overreach by the FCC. But the Republican Party, as it stands today, will not. And that is what the FCC's power grab is really about.

Democratic strategists have maintained that they own the world of social media, and they do. They beat Mitt Romney over the head with it in 2012. While this Democratic audience is less inclined to get involved in midterm elections, the impact social media has over the younger constituency who tend to vote Democratic is huge, particularly in presidential election years when these voters become more focused.

And every analysis we have read tells us that the largest GOP base is older Americans. Who still has landlines or will even talk on a phone? Older Americans. And who is least likely to have their faces shoved into a handheld device or to be surfing the net 24/7? You guessed it. Without those "pesky" automated phone calls to turn out their base, the GOP will be flattened come November '16.

The "experts" argue that the new rules will take years to have an effect and that autodialing systems will have plenty of ways of skirting the law. But they are missing the point. Automated phone calls will have become "illegal" in the minds of the public. GOP candidates and campaigns won't touch them with a 10-foot pole.

And what will appear to be a "pro-consumer" set of rules will instead make it virtually impossible for Republican candidates to turn out their base in the most important election of our lifetime.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 2016election; callblocking; demonrats; fcc; gop; netneutrality; robocalls; stasi; tomwheeler
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last
To: Kaslin
 photo Danger_zpswg9el240.jpg
21 posted on 06/04/2015 9:50:46 AM PDT by Huskrrrr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Yes, the old are not on Twitter, Instagram and Vine and don’t watch You Tube videos much.

However, Foxnews is on in the background and foreground, most waking hours.


22 posted on 06/04/2015 9:54:06 AM PDT by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

How does blocking “Polling” conflate with Get out the Vote efforts?


23 posted on 06/04/2015 9:56:34 AM PDT by G Larry (Obama Hates America, Israel, Capitalism, Freedom, and Christianity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

“I do not buy this at all.”
__________________________________________

Neither do I. I’ve never received a robocall from a politician, on either the land line or my cell phone.
Not once. Ever.

Also, this isn’t 2012, and Romney isn’t running. Ted Cruz and the other GOP candidates have been catching up to the dems in regards to social media.


24 posted on 06/04/2015 9:56:46 AM PDT by july4thfreedomfoundation (The so-called Southern Poverty Law Center is a hate group.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I do not answer calls I do not recognize. If the number is not in my phone rolodex I will not answer. By the same token I hate polls and pollsters.

The problem in this information age is that the increased use of cell phones has made any type of polling more difficult and using focus groups to try and gauge things isn't going to work either.

The days of polls being conducted by calling people on the old land line is slowly going the way of the Dodo bird, and it's skewed in that only a older segment of the population still relies on land line phones. My Father, for example, is 91 and went exclusively to a cell phone.

25 posted on 06/04/2015 9:58:26 AM PDT by Captain Peter Blood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Does he think that the GOP has an advantage with Robo calling? Every anecdote I have ever heard is how Dems abuse it especially push polling.

Not sure what to think. But if the Dim controlled FCC is in favor of it then I will reflexively oppose it.


26 posted on 06/04/2015 10:02:35 AM PDT by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I want to know how the robo-calls manage to keep the phone connection even if I hang up on them. Hang up and then pick up the phone a few minutes later and the damn robo-call is still going strong and I can’t call out until they finish.


27 posted on 06/04/2015 10:05:38 AM PDT by BuffaloJack (When did the 2nd amendment suddenly require a license or permit to exercise as a right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

How ridiculous.


28 posted on 06/04/2015 10:09:02 AM PDT by GeronL (free short story: http://flscifi.blogspot.com/2015/05/free-short-story-proper-care-feeding-of.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

No one I know on either side of the political fence listens to Robo-Calls.
The GOP is stuck in the 80’s if they think this makes any difference in an election outcome.
Candidates who listen to voters and NOT big buck donors will make the difference in the future.


29 posted on 06/04/2015 10:11:07 AM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain Peter Blood

I don’t answer calls from numbers that I don’t recognize either


30 posted on 06/04/2015 10:11:28 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

why not allow an automated means of doing the same.

I don’t want political calls from ANYBODY. In 2008 Obama’s Campain was relentless.


31 posted on 06/04/2015 10:14:17 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Not only do I disagree with his opinion, I will hazard my own that it hurts a candidate and people WON’T vote for them when they use it.

If I keep getting robocalls from any candidate I get mad, and I’m far less likely to vote for them, period. Obviously I won’t vote for a democrat because of it, but I will refuse to pull a lever if they’re obnoxious enough.


32 posted on 06/04/2015 10:16:36 AM PDT by Abathar (Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: henkster

Same here, plus I have specific ringtones for my smartphone, so I know right away who is calling. I have a specific ringtone for numbers that I do not recognize and after I do an online search for the number I add it to my reject list


33 posted on 06/04/2015 10:17:23 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Qiviut

Hey thanks for that link, I just ordered one. I live and take care of my 88 year old Aunt and I have had a devil of time trying to keep these blood thirsty phone parasites away from her always trying to con money out of her.

This is just the thing i need. I have ATT Uverse but the phone menu doesn’t do what I want. They have a feature where you can forward up to 20 phone number to another number and I use it for the really bad repeat callers, it goes directly to the Republican National Committee.


34 posted on 06/04/2015 10:17:41 AM PDT by Captain Peter Blood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The FCC can’t regulate calls that originate overseas from places like India.

Just run your call center operation out of India and tell the FCC to pound sand.


35 posted on 06/04/2015 10:20:17 AM PDT by MeganC (You can ignore reality, but reality won't ignore you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

Good, let it make the GOP have a great field organization down to the very last precinct.

Make them knock on doors and drive their elderly neighbors to the polls.


36 posted on 06/04/2015 10:25:24 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Also, the Dems have long nudged their voters to get their children registered. Let’s have our voters make sure their parents get to the polls.


37 posted on 06/04/2015 10:26:43 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sooth2222

The do not call list is only good for so long. After that you have to renew it again. The best solution is to have audio caller ID. Certain phones like Panasonic come with it. Also specific ringtones for your cell or smart phone list do help. I do have a specific ringtone that I downloaded from ZEDGE for numbers that I do not recognize. When that comes on I do not answer the call and after I do an online search for the number I add it to my reject list


38 posted on 06/04/2015 10:27:50 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
" to turn out their base in the most important election of our lifetime"

Really?

39 posted on 06/04/2015 10:28:05 AM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I don’t know if it’s right for the FCC, but pollsters and politicians should have never been exempted from the do not call list law in the first place. I doubt killing GOTV calls is really going to impact one party over the other.


40 posted on 06/04/2015 10:28:22 AM PDT by discostu (In fact funk's as old as dirt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson