This truly is a “slippery slope” they have put us on.
Hey it’s for the CHILLUN!!
The idea that “gay marriage” is for the chillun could be challenged seriously by actual empirical observation. However when a whole “science” (psychology in this case) has sworn itself to muteness on any adverse effects of calling buggery “love” then it’s harder than it would otherwise be to collate such evidence.
Thanks to the liberal SCOTUS, when the Manygoats family moves in nest door you will immediately know a little about them....
Why couldn’t I marry myself so I could file my taxes as married-joint?
They won’t stop there, or anywhere. There is no limiting principle. That is why this must be stopped by revoking government’s power to define and regulate marriage entirely. Then marriage will return to being a private affair (as a manner of speaking), and the #PinkSwastika crowd will have to take their #BakeTheCake lawfare somewhere else.
I’m wondering how avowed singles will be addressed in all this.
So I can marry Catherine Zeta Jones AND Penolope Cruz at the same time?
Phew. That solves my biggest problem.
Don’t forget about marrying animals.
“Dogs and Cats, living together”
I got question who want be marry to three different women at same time HELLO
That three mother in laws LOL!
Can you imagine that family dynamatic
Pay more taxes.
Hire more Democrat government employees.
The Democrat government employees pay dues to their union.
The union gives money to the Democrat politicians.
Pay more taxes.......
“And we go round and round and round in the circle game.”
There is no comparison between the perversion that is homosexuality and the practice of polygamy across many cultures and millennia.
I do NOT advocate the legalization of polygamy in America today. Nevertheless, polygamy is nowhere near as vile and disgusting and unnatural as homosexuality.
While the Bible teaches “one husband-one wife” as the norm, God tolerated polygamy. Homosexuality is condemned as an abomination.
“If a man has sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They are to be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads.” Leviticus 20:13
A fool is more dangerous than a scoundrel.
"Couples"? That opinion proves "Justice" Kennedy is nothing more than a low-down, hate-filled, narrow-minded clusterphobe.
Dang. I've coined new word.
Why not communal marriages where the are numerous husbands and wives? These people love each other. If one get social security, shouldn’t they all?
They want pedophilia and they will get it. Adult perverts are already are grooming the children for molestation in the public schools. They are following the book.
Now they just need Hillary’s “rights of the child” to make their own sexual decisions with whomever they “choose” without parental or government interference.
The next step is to sue all religious organizations into bankruptcy.
“Why not polygamy?”
Well, why not? I’ve long noted that this society has long been accepting of polygamy within selected contexts:
1. Charlie Sheen openly living with multiple women.
2. Hugh Hefner doing the same.
3. Endless numbers of men engaging in serial polygamy where they marry, divorce, and marry again.
4. A significant enough number of urban men impregnating multiple women that MTV gave them their own TV program.
5. The long standing stereotype of the wealthy businessman or actor with a wife at home and a mistress on the side. Arnold Schwarzzzzzendoofus comes to mind, too.
So all of this is just fine with America but let a man commit to two women and their children and it’s okay to submit them to our requisite Two Minutes of Hate every day?
Seems to me that a poly family of a man and two women is a lot more “normal” to me than two men adopting a little boy and raising him to be a pervert just like his dear old dads.
Age of consent next, to 11 then nine...