Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cementjungle

The plane is pressurized. It is held together by a very thin aluminum skin stretched over ribs. Break that skin almost anywhere and there is a sudden, progressive cascade of events, each worse than the one before it. Ripples caused by the air current flow down the sides causing even more breakup. From start to finish is typically very short.

Survival of the aircraft from events like the flight that lost a large upper fuselage section as it approached Hawaii are rare. If I recall that was a Boeing and Boeing tends to design with a belt and suspenders approach. I believe this was an Airbus. Airbus has had more of this type structural failure probably because the basic design philosophy is looser.


19 posted on 11/01/2015 11:51:13 AM PST by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Gen.Blather

Explosive decompression resulting in structural disintegration does not happen any longer. It became famous because of the first jet airliner, the Comet, was lost this way. Modern aircraft do not have this weakness.


22 posted on 11/01/2015 12:16:59 PM PST by Tzfat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Gen.Blather

“The plane is pressurized. It is held together by a very thin aluminum skin stretched over ribs. Break that skin almost anywhere and there is a sudden, progressive cascade of events, each worse than the one before it.”

This is not true. Airplanes are constructed with spars, ribs, formers and stringers. Then they are skinned with aluminum. Composite aircraft are the exception.

Wide body aircraft can have more than one window blow out and still maintain pressurization.


23 posted on 11/01/2015 12:18:14 PM PST by CFIIIMEIATP737
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson