Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Was the Fix in for Hillary Clinton in the Email Scandal That Exposed This Nation to Such Great Risk?
RushLimbaugh.com ^ | 7/6/2016 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 07/07/2016 10:26:29 PM PDT by UnwashedPeasant

RUSH: So back on April 10th, Obama appears on Fox News Sunday ... and he just happened to use ... exactly the same words that James Comey ended up using yesterday. There's an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal pointing this out on April the 11th by Cleta Mitchell. "President Obama chooses his words carefully, so it was startling on Sunday when he chose to opine on the Justice Department's investigation into Hillary Clinton's private email server. All the more so in the way that he phrased his defense of the Democrat he wants to succeed him as President in January.

"On Fox News Sunday, host Chris Wallace rolled a clip from October of Mr. Obama saying that 'I can tell you this is not a situation in which America's national security was endangered.' Mr. Wallace then cited the 2,000 or so emails we have since learned contained classified information, including 22 that included 'top secret' information, and he asked: 'Can you still say flatly that she did not jeopardize America's secrets?' Mr. Obama replied: 'I've got to be careful because, as you know, there have been investigations, there are hearings, Congress is looking at this.

"And I haven't been sorting through each and every aspect of this. Here's what I know: Hillary Clinton was an outstanding Secretary of State. She would never intentionally put America in any kind of jeopardy.' Mr. Wallace pressed further on the jeopardy angle, and Mr. Obama responded again: 'I continue to believe that she has not jeopardized America's national security. Now what I've also said is that -- and she has acknowledged -- that there's a carelessness, in terms of managing emails...'" It's almost... It's uncanny how like Comey's remarks yesterday Obama's words were all the way back in April.

(Excerpt) Read more at rushlimbaugh.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: clintoncrimefamily; corruption; crookedhillary
BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Okay. The fix. Is this whole thing with Hillary and the emails and the FBI and the DOJ, was the fix in? Can't blame people for going there and asking that because what happened here is in utter conflict with common sense. What happened yesterday makes no common sense. Not if the rule of law matters. Now, it does make common sense if you can come up with some other theory. And they're all over the place.

1 posted on 07/07/2016 10:26:29 PM PDT by UnwashedPeasant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: UnwashedPeasant

Rhetorical question to say the least


2 posted on 07/07/2016 10:28:19 PM PDT by George Washington Axe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnwashedPeasant

The rule of law has meant nothing yo the Democrat Party for many years now, Rush. You should know that.


3 posted on 07/07/2016 10:30:11 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnwashedPeasant

Alex, I’ll take Fixed for $1,000.


4 posted on 07/07/2016 10:41:00 PM PDT by umgud (ban muslims, not guns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnwashedPeasant

I was listening to the andreasheaking show on blogtalk. She mentioned a thread on 4chan about the Clinton Foundation.

I didn’t know what that was, so I googled it and found a discussion about it on another site. Not going to link to it, but here is the first part of the discussion, from a supposed FBI insider:

>>79480356 (OP)
Will she be indicted?

{NOTE: This thread was from BEFORE the announcement by Comey that there would not be any indictment}

>>79481119
There is intense pressure for us not to do so. I am posting from a position of near anonymity and enough plausible deniability to evade prosecution, as we have all been given gag orders.

There is enough for her and the entire government to be brought down. People do not realize how enormous this whole situation actually is. Whether she will be or not depends on how much info about others involved gets out, and there are a lot of people involved.

The real point of interest is the Clinton Foundation, not the e-mail server. We received the server from Benghazi, then from the server we found data on the CF. Then we realized the situation is much worse than previously thought.

Super Classified Materials on the Clinton Email Server

>>79481467
She had SAP level programs on her server, which if made public, would literally cause an uprising and possibly foreign declarations of war.


5 posted on 07/07/2016 10:44:56 PM PDT by JohnnyP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnwashedPeasant

All you have to do to beat Hillary is make her work for it... Because she’s TERRIBLE at it.


6 posted on 07/07/2016 11:02:37 PM PDT by Bullish (Blame others for your failures? Take credits where none are do? Who made you Pharaoh?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: umgud
If hillary was charged with anything, bozo would have pardoned her before leaving office

As it is ... she's fair game STILL for President Trump and Sheriff Joe, BOTH of whom don't believe the citizenship of the mulatto usurper

7 posted on 07/07/2016 11:16:05 PM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true ... and it ticks people off)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyP

“The real point of interest is the Clinton Foundation, not the e-mail server. “

The real crime of Bill Clinton’s administration was transfer of critical technology to foreign governments (China) in return for political contributions. Instead we spent years hearing about Monica. The Republicans in the House and Senate didn’t have the stones to impeach Bill for treason.


8 posted on 07/08/2016 5:40:09 AM PDT by Soul of the South (Tomorrow is gone. Today will be what we make of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

The rule of law, along with other outdated concepts such as civility and respectful debate, went out the window when the Democrats fully embraced Saul Alinsky and his playbook in the early 70’s.


9 posted on 07/08/2016 5:56:38 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson