Posted on 07/07/2016 10:26:29 PM PDT by UnwashedPeasant
RUSH: So back on April 10th, Obama appears on Fox News Sunday ... and he just happened to use ... exactly the same words that James Comey ended up using yesterday. There's an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal pointing this out on April the 11th by Cleta Mitchell. "President Obama chooses his words carefully, so it was startling on Sunday when he chose to opine on the Justice Department's investigation into Hillary Clinton's private email server. All the more so in the way that he phrased his defense of the Democrat he wants to succeed him as President in January.
"On Fox News Sunday, host Chris Wallace rolled a clip from October of Mr. Obama saying that 'I can tell you this is not a situation in which America's national security was endangered.' Mr. Wallace then cited the 2,000 or so emails we have since learned contained classified information, including 22 that included 'top secret' information, and he asked: 'Can you still say flatly that she did not jeopardize America's secrets?' Mr. Obama replied: 'I've got to be careful because, as you know, there have been investigations, there are hearings, Congress is looking at this.
"And I haven't been sorting through each and every aspect of this. Here's what I know: Hillary Clinton was an outstanding Secretary of State. She would never intentionally put America in any kind of jeopardy.' Mr. Wallace pressed further on the jeopardy angle, and Mr. Obama responded again: 'I continue to believe that she has not jeopardized America's national security. Now what I've also said is that -- and she has acknowledged -- that there's a carelessness, in terms of managing emails...'" It's almost... It's uncanny how like Comey's remarks yesterday Obama's words were all the way back in April.
(Excerpt) Read more at rushlimbaugh.com ...
RUSH: Okay. The fix. Is this whole thing with Hillary and the emails and the FBI and the DOJ, was the fix in? Can't blame people for going there and asking that because what happened here is in utter conflict with common sense. What happened yesterday makes no common sense. Not if the rule of law matters. Now, it does make common sense if you can come up with some other theory. And they're all over the place.
Rhetorical question to say the least
The rule of law has meant nothing yo the Democrat Party for many years now, Rush. You should know that.
Alex, I’ll take Fixed for $1,000.
I was listening to the andreasheaking show on blogtalk. She mentioned a thread on 4chan about the Clinton Foundation.
I didn’t know what that was, so I googled it and found a discussion about it on another site. Not going to link to it, but here is the first part of the discussion, from a supposed FBI insider:
>>79480356 (OP)
Will she be indicted?
{NOTE: This thread was from BEFORE the announcement by Comey that there would not be any indictment}
>>79481119
There is intense pressure for us not to do so. I am posting from a position of near anonymity and enough plausible deniability to evade prosecution, as we have all been given gag orders.
There is enough for her and the entire government to be brought down. People do not realize how enormous this whole situation actually is. Whether she will be or not depends on how much info about others involved gets out, and there are a lot of people involved.
The real point of interest is the Clinton Foundation, not the e-mail server. We received the server from Benghazi, then from the server we found data on the CF. Then we realized the situation is much worse than previously thought.
Super Classified Materials on the Clinton Email Server
>>79481467
She had SAP level programs on her server, which if made public, would literally cause an uprising and possibly foreign declarations of war.
All you have to do to beat Hillary is make her work for it... Because she’s TERRIBLE at it.
As it is ... she's fair game STILL for President Trump and Sheriff Joe, BOTH of whom don't believe the citizenship of the mulatto usurper
“The real point of interest is the Clinton Foundation, not the e-mail server. “
The real crime of Bill Clinton’s administration was transfer of critical technology to foreign governments (China) in return for political contributions. Instead we spent years hearing about Monica. The Republicans in the House and Senate didn’t have the stones to impeach Bill for treason.
The rule of law, along with other outdated concepts such as civility and respectful debate, went out the window when the Democrats fully embraced Saul Alinsky and his playbook in the early 70’s.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.