I will be asking for a major investigation into VOTER FRAUD, including those registered to vote in

Real Donald Trump twitter account ^ | January 25, 2017

[SMGFan]

I will be asking for a major investigation into VOTER FRAUD, including those registered to vote in two states, those who are illegal and even, those registered to vote who are dead (and many for a long time). Depending on results, we will strengthen up voting procedures!

[ichabod1]

Well, I think it happens in every major city. So there’s plenty of ground to cover. It’s how they keep the urban areas under democrat control.

[chris37]

Good.

And now I am watching whine like stuck pigs about it on Fox.

You asked for it, MFers.

[bobcat62]

I’d hope Philadelphia would be investigated.

[Crucial]

Now THAT is WINNING!

[Cementjungle]

Same thing happened to me when I moved out of WA. Took a couple of letters and phone calls to get off the rolls there. All voting is done their via mail, so would be easy for a new owner of my house there to send in my ballot.

Now I'm in FL, and every year we get a slew of new residents moving here from NY and NJ, and I bet many vote in both states for as long as they can.

[veracious]

Hurrah! What a concept, only real USAians should ever vote.

[ichabod1]

ANd if we can stay focused on #WINNING we have an opportunity to destroy them, and we must, because otherwise we tolerate corruption and evil in the halls of power.

[ichabod1]

Exactly! If you deport 3 million illegals from Los Angeles, how does that change the election dynamics next time? Not in a bad way!

[DannyTN]

I don’t think he meant two specific states. He meant people registered to vote in any two states out of the 50.

It wouldn’t be that hard.
Get the voter roles for federal elections from all 50 states. Do a database comparison on them. Check any that appear to be duplicates against social security numbers.

[meyer]

I have a feeling that he’s already investigated a lot of this, or has some strong supportive facts and evidence already.

[ichabod1]

This election was a perfect example - things changed so much after early voting started. I wondered how many regretted their votes.

[Norseman]

My guess would be Nevada, for starters.

Nevada went from Red to Blue in November, against the prevailing winds across the rest of the country, and it did so on the basis of the results of just one county, the one with Las Vegas in it, which also happens to be where Harry Reid had the greatest influence.

Fraud there might very well have cost the GOP a Senate seat, and cost Nevada GOP control at the state level as well. Trump should have AG Sessions go through that county’s results thoroughly. It could be a gold mine of fraud.

[Norseman]

>>I don’t think he meant two specific states. He meant people registered to vote in any two states out of the 50.<<

Yes, you’re right. That’s no doubt what he meant. It’s still fun to try to figure out the two most likely states to yield fraudulent votes though.

[NEMDF]

On NBC nightly news (5:30 pm central time) last night, this subject was being covered from the angle that Trump lies, and has no proof about voter fraud.

One of the reporters was trying to explain it, and said that Trump had said something about “...millions of illegals had voted....” and the reporter gal said, “...that means he thinks many people voted illegally...”.

Refused to acknowledge that ILLEGALS had voted ILLEGALLY.

[Art in Idaho]

KILL MOTOR VOTER FRAUD

Amen to that!

Yup, Clinton all in with all the socialist scams. They slipped motor-voter in under everyone's nose. I didn't even know about it until I was studying about the Cloward-Piven strategy. What an evil unconstitutional strategy.

All things Clinton need a second and third look. What about HIS EOs that he snuck through in the 90s? Are some still intact and harming the country?

[DannyTN]

You’d think California and one of it’s neighbors. But then again New York and Illinois are probably in contention.

[Bartholomew Roberts]

After rereading, I would agree with your reply. It would be great to cover all 50 states. I would be surprised if major “D” states would open up their precinct poll books to the new administration though.

Having worked in marketing research firms that focused on tight target marketing, I am used to the mechanics of matching hard copy lists of consumers to cable tv subscribers to mailing lists, etc.

It will be a hugely labor intensive project no matter what anyone can do to find matches with computer algorithms.

[Boogieman]

Could be Michigan or Pennsylvania too; lots of very easily detectable fraud in Detroit and Philly.

[TheCornerOffice]

I think they can have jurisdiction of it pertains to federal elections

Right. I remember a vote-buying investigation in my home county in Alabama back in the 1970's where the sheriff was paying off voters with cash.

The FBI got involved because there were candidates for federal office (Senate, if I remember correctly) on the ballot. Ultimately, the sheriff did a few months of jail time. So although election procedures are normally the domain of the state, county or city, the feds can get involved related to federal office.

Here is a link to a lawsuit summary in the Appeals court related to this case, which gives good background in the first few paragraphs:

http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/615/329/415964/

[ssaftler]

If I had to guess the two states, I’d go with California for the illegals and Illinois for the cemetery votes.

California has the “Motor-Voter Law”, more like the “Auto-Fraudo Law”. It lets you register to vote when you get your driver’s license at the DMV. The biggest problem here is that you do not have to prove you are an American citizen to get your license, so, by extension, you don’t need it to register to vote.

Someone else pointed out Florida due to the double voting of the snowbirds, but I don’t think that’s quite as big a problem as the other two states.