Posted on 02/03/2018 3:11:22 PM PST by FreedomMonkey
(Excerpt) Read more at youtu.be ...
The Times story and ensuing media blitz served to promote Tom Delonge's To The Stars Academy, helping them raise $2.5 million so far. And they're not receiving donations but rather "investments" for extraterrestrial anti-gravity technology they promise to deliver. Just wow! And the only 'evidence' they've produced themselves to support their claim that any extraterrestrial aircraft exist is the Gimbal Video, which is laid to waste in that video.
That bit about the optical artifacts sounds like the ATF DOJ excuse about the gun bursts into the burning Branch Davidian compund
The NYT is not exactly on the passed the fifth grade science test group.
Just count the number of “catastrophic climate change” stores they upchuck.
Well recall the millions Rats gave Corrupt AF Harry Reid’s billionaire pal to ‘warehouse’ ‘alien’ ‘spacecraft’.
The truth is out there somewhere.
If the US Government really wanted to disclose they would show multiple close-up HD color video or pictures. Not a video that has been out on the internet for 12 years.
Somebody has GOT to put Hillary’s face on that one - it’d probably go viral...
I got this in the mail today.
Yeah. And maybe it was an “optical artifact” that caused the FBI sniper to shoot Vicki Weaver in the head.
The Dallas Morning News once ran a photo on the front page of a UFO in action. It was a sky shot with clouds in the background. The UFO was an inverted “v” with what looked like an exhaust coming out the back end. I worked in the photo industry and recognized it instantly as the density pattern you get when you kink a photo negative. Here was a company with its own photo department that didn’t know film damage when they saw it.
She flies well!!
Apparently needs a new broom after a short time, though....
It’s true that the higher the magnification, the greater the objective lens needed or detail is lost. It’s a physical law called diffraction limitation, in which image resolution depends on lens size and wavelength received, and cannot be avoided by technology or lens quality. Something seen 30 or more miles away on a standard camera lens with high zoom won’t show any real detail like you’d see up close.
The spectacle recently foisted upon us was so deceptive. The ‘footage’ (can you say cgi training gun camera footage which topgun pilots have seen t5oo often, and not a UFO) played while the honest Pilot spoke of the ‘tictac’ he observed did not in any way match what he was describing. He was used by sneaky CIA programming meant to take over the narrative. ... Is some foreign government about to go public with the real truth of UFOs over the past fifty years? Stay tuned!
The pilot’s testimony is dispositive.
Wow. It must have been sent out as a promo to get subscribers.
Ten years ago while walking my dog, I look up and I estimate in the clouds three miles away, I see a solid gold Pyramid facing up, it would have to had been at least twenty stories high. I watched it for about ten seconds, it never moved, then I turned to tell a guy I see washing his car, just before I tell him it vanished. I have no clue what that was...
Probably 30 years ago my wife was driving to work and saw a huge castle in the sky. She thought she was going nuts, and didn’t tell anybody what she saw - including me.
Until that evening, when I was reading the paper. Something like: “Hey - you know that hot-air balloon festival? Some rich guy has a one that’s worth $2 million dollars! It’s in the shape of a castle!”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.