Skip to comments.
North Korea bans Bolton from talks [original NK rant in 2003]
Washington Times ^
| August 4, 2003
Posted on 05/16/2018 5:13:17 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
North Korea bans Bolton from talks
By - The Washington Times - Monday, August 4, 2003
SEOUL Pyongyang, calling a senior American official human scum for criticizing North Koreas leader, banned him from U.S.-proposed multilateral talks on its suspected development of nuclear weapons.
North Korea said that it wont deal with U.S. Undersecretary of State John Bolton because he described communist leader Kim Jong Il as a tyrannical dictator and said life is a hellish nightmare for many North Koreans.
Mr. Bolton made the remarks during a visit to South Korea last week.
Such human scum and bloodsucker is not entitled to take part in the talks, said a North Korean Foreign Ministry spokesman, according to the Norths official KCNA news agency.
We have decided not to consider him as an official of the U.S. administration any longer nor to deal with him, the unidentified spokesman said.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bloodsucker; bolton; humanscum; nkorea
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo; nuconvert; MizSterious; endthematrix; Grampa Dave; ...
2
posted on
05/16/2018 5:13:57 AM PDT
by
TigerLikesRooster
(dead parakeet + lost fishing gear = freep all day)
To: TigerLikesRooster
3
posted on
05/16/2018 5:17:49 AM PDT
by
tennmountainman
("Prophet Mountainman" Predicter Of All Things RINO...for a small fee.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
I sure hope Trump stands strongly with Bolton.
I think it is Kim, trying to foist an agenda on Trump with this.
Don’t do it Trump.
4
posted on
05/16/2018 5:25:47 AM PDT
by
cba123
( Toi la nguoi My. Toi bay gio o Viet Nam.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
To: TigerLikesRooster
6
posted on
05/16/2018 5:40:05 AM PDT
by
coon2000
(Give me Liberty or give me death)
To: TigerLikesRooster
I like Bolton, but his sense off timing is just nuts. Given that no one has ever given up their nuclear weapons before, plus the “ great leader's “ sensitivity to insults, this s is hardly the time to go trashing him in South Korea no less. KEEP JOHN BOLTON THE HECK OUT OF THE NEGOTIATIONS. Let Pompeo, who finished first of in his class at West Point and first in his class at Harvard Law and is the extremely smart take the major roll in the negotiations. You get more with honey than with vinegar. Pompeo managed to get three US prisoners released last week without drama. Everything was going well until Bolton came blundering in.
To: SmokingJoe
This is from 2003. I emphasized it in the title. I just wanted to show that NK and Bolton go way back.:-)
8
posted on
05/16/2018 6:03:27 AM PDT
by
TigerLikesRooster
(dead parakeet + lost fishing gear = freep all day)
To: TigerLikesRooster
I just wanted to show that NK and Bolton go way backAnd proving Bolton was right from the start regarding this rogue corrupt regime.
9
posted on
05/16/2018 6:05:22 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
To: cba123
Bolton is a fool. Why go trashing the guy when he is already dismantling his nuclear test site? Is Bolton not aware that most of North Korea's generals are against denuclearization? Why make it harder for him to denuclearize?
To: SmokingJoe
Libya & South Africa & Ukraine gave up nukes or programs, IIRC.
11
posted on
05/16/2018 6:07:10 AM PDT
by
PghBaldy
(12/14 - 930am -rampage begins... 12/15 - 1030am - Obama's advance team scouts photo-op locations.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
I see. My mistake. Thought it was last week.
To: TigerLikesRooster
“Such human scum and bloodsucker is not entitled to take part in the talks, “
That’d be Little Kimmy.
They don’t get to tell us who our officials are, especially since their fat little kid is a scummy bloodsucker!
13
posted on
05/16/2018 6:07:47 AM PDT
by
CodeToad
To: TigerLikesRooster
“”This is from 2003. I emphasized it in the title””
Well, by golly - it looks like you’ll have to get out the 2x4 to get their attention. I don’t know why people REFUSE to read...they jump to conclusions and then others join in...
Good post BTW....
To: PghBaldy
Libya had a nuclear program but no nukes. South Africa got black majority rule from the whites. The blacks did not feel the need to use nuclear weapons to protect themselves from their black neighbors like the whites did.
Ukraine's nuclear weapons belonged to the Soviet Union and the Russians got all the Soviet nukes, including the nukes stationed in former Soviet states like Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan. None off these apply to North Korea.
To: PghBaldy
‘Libya’
Really helped Gaddafi in the long run didn’t it? Arab Spring and being dragged through the streets and shot with Hillary laughing her approval.
16
posted on
05/16/2018 6:21:58 AM PDT
by
Lent
To: july4thfreedomfoundation
Why would the Times drag out that very old article?
17
posted on
05/16/2018 6:27:18 AM PDT
by
odawg
To: TigerLikesRooster
All the more an exercise in contrast to behold how much they prefer and in fact endear scandalous, incompetent, feckless rope-suckers like Madeline Albright, Bill Richardson, John Kerry and Chris Hill.
Sorry Pyang, new gang in town!
To: TigerLikesRooster
“But, dude, that’s so, like fifteen years ago...” :)
19
posted on
05/16/2018 7:07:30 AM PDT
by
OKSooner
(Don't be a Fudd.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Such human scum and bloodsucker is not entitled to take part in the talks, said a North Korean Foreign Ministry spokesman, according to the Norths official KCNA news agency.I see the North Koreans are on the distribution list for Democrat talking points.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson